Travel Mapping
Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Topic started by: rickmastfan67 on August 16, 2025, 04:41:20 am
-
If we've gone thru the trouble of having two separate points for I-64 & I-95 inside of I-195's file, shouldn't we have said 'I-95' point in I-95's file (as '79A') to allow a graph connection between the two routes?
-
If we've gone thru the trouble of having two separate points for I-64 & I-95 inside of I-195's file, shouldn't we have said 'I-95' point in I-95's file (as '79A') to allow a graph connection between the two routes?
Not to mention that I-64 has separate points too - I-95 is the only route that doesn't here.