Travel Mapping

User Discussions => Other Discussion => Topic started by: Jim on February 14, 2016, 12:31:46 am

Title: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on February 14, 2016, 12:31:46 am
I haven't posted anything like this since we moved to this forum, so I thought it was time.

Our highway and user data now results in a database that gets constructed from 3,727,950 lines of SQL.  Over 20,000 .wpt files now get processed, along with 113 .list files.

A site update now takes about a half hour from start to finish.  When I get a chance over the summer to unify the regular database and the one that includes preview routes for mapping and stats, I expect we'll cut that nearly in half.  If I run it on my FreeBSD desktop instead of my Mac Book Pro, it also seems to be 25% faster, at least.  I'm sure other efficiency improvements will also present themselves the next time I can get my hands deep into the site update code.

Load on the server to serve maps and stats pages (including running the cgi scripts and DB queries) seems nearly negligible.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on February 14, 2016, 03:23:29 am
How many users do mapping their travels / how many list files of real travelers do we have now?
I think CHM had about 350.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on February 14, 2016, 08:46:52 am
Quote from: michih on February 14, 2016, 03:23:29 am
How many users do mapping their travels / how many list files of real travelers do we have now?
I think CHM had about 350.

It's right around 100.  We have a bunch of dummy files that are used to help find errors, etc. The next time I work on getting more statistics computation and reporting set up, I'd like to do something to flag those so that aren't listed in rankings, included in averages, etc.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on February 14, 2016, 12:16:34 pm
Quote from: Jim on February 14, 2016, 08:46:52 am
It's right around 100.  We have a bunch of dummy files that are used to help find errors, etc. The next time I work on getting more statistics computation and reporting set up, I'd like to do something to flag those so that aren't listed in rankings, included in averages, etc.
On a related note, there are still some vestigial log files (yaxtest-ma138.log, yaxtest-ma79.log, yaxtest-us6.log) for dummy lists that I deleted. They're in the /logs directory but not /devlogs. (Maybe they predate the creation of devlogs...) Might be a good idea to clean up that directory / those directories, and/or automate a cleanup / rebuild-from-scratch as part of the site update process.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on February 14, 2016, 12:27:12 pm
^^ These log files must be deleted manually (by Jim). There are also michih2.log files ;).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on February 14, 2016, 03:28:11 pm
Quote from: yakra on February 14, 2016, 12:16:34 pm
Quote from: Jim on February 14, 2016, 08:46:52 am
It's right around 100.  We have a bunch of dummy files that are used to help find errors, etc. The next time I work on getting more statistics computation and reporting set up, I'd like to do something to flag those so that aren't listed in rankings, included in averages, etc.
On a related note, there are still some vestigial log files (yaxtest-ma138.log, yaxtest-ma79.log, yaxtest-us6.log) for dummy lists that I deleted. They're in the /logs directory but not /devlogs. (Maybe they predate the creation of devlogs...) Might be a good idea to clean up that directory / those directories, and/or automate a cleanup / rebuild-from-scratch as part of the site update process.

For now, I've done a quick cleanup.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Thing342 on February 15, 2016, 11:08:14 am
Furthermore, the website now contains 40956 lines of code, with 2,488 being standard HTML/PHP stuff. Most of the other stuff is split among the SVG shield definitions and styling files.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on February 15, 2016, 01:06:07 pm
Quote from: Thing342 on February 15, 2016, 11:08:14 am
Furthermore, the website now contains 40956 lines of code, with 2,488 being standard HTML/PHP stuff. Most of it is split among the SVG shield definitions and styling files.
What are the other 38,468?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Thing342 on February 15, 2016, 01:51:58 pm
Quote from: yakra on February 15, 2016, 01:06:07 pm
Quote from: Thing342 on February 15, 2016, 11:08:14 am
Furthermore, the website now contains 40956 lines of code, with 2,488 being standard HTML/PHP stuff. Most of it is split among the SVG shield definitions and styling files.
What are the other 38,468?
Mistyped my post. Most of the rest of the code is in SVG shield definitions, CSS files, and the WPT editor (which is written in JS)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on February 20, 2016, 06:15:22 pm
There are currently 404 .wpt files that do not have entries in .csv files.  Nothing wrong with that, as its perfectly reasonable to commit partial work on wpt files before they're ready for a csv file that will put them into the system in devel mode. 

But the fact that "404" were "not found" grabbed my attention.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: mapcat on February 20, 2016, 07:27:00 pm
Quote from: Jim on February 20, 2016, 06:15:22 pm
There are currently 404 .wpt files that do not have entries in .csv files.  Nothing wrong with that, as its perfectly reasonable to commit partial work on wpt files before they're ready for a csv file that will put them into the system in devel mode.

Where can we see a list of those? I'll check to see if I forgot any.

Quote
But the fact that "404" were "not found" grabbed my attention.
;D
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on February 20, 2016, 11:09:20 pm
Quote from: mapcat on February 20, 2016, 07:27:00 pm
Quote from: Jim on February 20, 2016, 06:15:22 pm
There are currently 404 .wpt files that do not have entries in .csv files.  Nothing wrong with that, as its perfectly reasonable to commit partial work on wpt files before they're ready for a csv file that will put them into the system in devel mode.

Where can we see a list of those? I'll check to see if I forgot any.

http://tm.teresco.org/logs/unprocessedwpts.log (http://tm.teresco.org/logs/unprocessedwpts.log)

Some of these belong, as they are part of not-yet-in-devel systems or (like some usava) are copies for routes that will later be moved in from other systems.  But there are quite a few that don't need to stay.  I'd consider it a low priority cleanup, but one worth doing when time permits.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on February 21, 2016, 07:21:12 am
The following WPTs can be deleted.  They have been "turned back" (MnDOT-speak for decommissioned):

hwy_data/MN/usamn/mn.mn290.wpt
hwy_data/MN/usamn/mn.mn293.wpt
hwy_data/MN/usamn/mn.mn294.wpt
hwy_data/MN/usamn/mn.mn295.wpt
hwy_data/MN/usamn/mn.mn297.wpt
hwy_data/MN/usamn/mn.mn333.wpt
hwy_data/MN/usamn/mn.mn361.wpt
hwy_data/MN/usamn/mn.mn801.wpt
hwy_data/MN/usamn/mn.mn860.wpt


I'll have to look back and see why Tim deactivated MN 309.  Will also have to see why the leg of MN 23 through Wisconsin is on the "unprocessed list".
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on February 21, 2016, 08:34:55 am
Quote from: froggie on February 21, 2016, 07:21:12 am
Will also have to see why the leg of MN 23 through Wisconsin is on the "unprocessed list".
It's in the wrong folder (there's one in the right folder that is processed) - MN/usamn rather than WI/usamn.

I've made a pull request deleting the ones you listed, some in my regions that are there for no reason, and a handful of wrong folder files (checking that there were right folder equivalents)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Bickendan on February 21, 2016, 03:57:05 pm
The yt.bc097s need to be checked -- I think they're appearing correctly in the BC directory, so the ones in the YT directory might be superfluous.
That said, I know that bc.bc097con isn't showing on the map.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on February 21, 2016, 04:23:35 pm
Quote from: Bickendan on February 21, 2016, 03:57:05 pm
The yt.bc097s need to be checked -- I think they're appearing correctly in the BC directory, so the ones in the YT directory might be superfluous.
Other way around. And dealt with.
Quote
That said, I know that bc.bc097con isn't showing on the map.
It is for me.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: oscar on February 21, 2016, 11:41:34 pm
The Alaska Highway zigzags along the YT/BC border. It's YT 1 for the part YT maintains, which includes one segment in BC and two in YT, and BC 97 for the part that province maintains, which includes three segments in YT and four in BC.

See http://cmap.m-plex.com/hb/selecthwys.php?sys=cansph&rg=all&gr=p#r and http://cmap.m-plex.com/hb/selecthwys.php?sys=canyt&rg=all&gr=p#r to confirm what belongs where (I edited some files from what was in CHM, but didn't move or rename any).

All the BC 97 segments in YT, and YT 1 segment in BC, seem to be where they belong in TM.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: rickmastfan67 on February 24, 2016, 03:12:47 am
These files can be axed:
hwy_data/SC/usaib/sc.i073futmyr.wpt
hwy_data/SC/usaib/sc.i074futmyr.wpt
hwy_data/SC/usaib/sc.i526futcha.wpt

Seems they somehow got duplicated into the wrong folder as they are already in the 'hwy_data/SC/usaif/' folder, which is the correct folder for them.

As for the following file, it can be safely deleted since the route was decommissioned a few years ago.  No idea why Tim didn't delete the file, and thus, got erroneously uploaded to TM.
hwy_data/SC/usausb/sc.us021busroc.wpt
Quote
June 2014
(USA) South Carolina US 21 Business (Rock Hill): Deleted route.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/448
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Bickendan on February 25, 2016, 10:49:55 pm
Quote from: oscar on February 21, 2016, 11:41:34 pm
The Alaska Highway zigzags along the YT/BC border. It's YT 1 for the part YT maintains, which includes one segment in BC and two in YT, and BC 97 for the part that province maintains, which includes three segments in YT and four in BC.

See http://cmap.m-plex.com/hb/selecthwys.php?sys=cansph&rg=all&gr=p#r and http://cmap.m-plex.com/hb/selecthwys.php?sys=canyt&rg=all&gr=p#r to confirm what belongs where (I edited some files from what was in CHM, but didn't move or rename any).

All the BC 97 segments in YT, and YT 1 segment in BC, seem to be where they belong in TM.
NT 5 also border skips between NWT and Alberta, if memory serves.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on March 28, 2016, 11:24:03 pm
With Oscar's updates today, we are not showing any more locations where 8 or more points are colocated that have points from placeholder files anymore.  So that's good.  Our new (and I expect valid) current record for most routes at a given point is now 10, which happens in 3 places: Public Square in Cleveland, the Mississippi River bridge at Memphis that carries 5 routes across the AR/TN border, and what appears to be a similar situation to that where 5 routes cross concurrently between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.

Here are the complete colocation counts from tonight's site update:

Waypoint colocation counts:
220105 are each occupied by  1 waypoints.
 82534 are each occupied by  2 waypoints.
 17524 are each occupied by  3 waypoints.
  3873 are each occupied by  4 waypoints.
  1013 are each occupied by  5 waypoints.
   211 are each occupied by  6 waypoints.
    55 are each occupied by  7 waypoints.
    12 are each occupied by  8 waypoints.
     7 are each occupied by  9 waypoints.
     3 are each occupied by 10 waypoints.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on March 29, 2016, 10:00:30 am
Quote from: Jim on March 28, 2016, 11:24:03 pm
and what appears to be a similar situation to that where 5 routes cross concurrently between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.
Actually, as Kazakhstan renumbered it, it's 4 concurrent routes (AH5, AH62, E40 and E123), the old Soviet M39 (Uzbekistan only) and the Kazakh A2.

Public Square in Cleveland has: US6, US20, US42, US322, US422, OH3, OH8, OH14, OH43 and OH87 (all but the first two terminating), giving an average of 3 concurrent routes on each of the four routes we map.

And the Mississippi River Bridge is: I-55, US61, US64, US70 and US79
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on April 03, 2016, 03:57:56 am
With last nights update you can now map travels from the Atlantic to the Pacific across Eurasia in preview systems, as well as travel across the two most populated countries in the world. http://tm.teresco.org/user/system.php?u=si404&sys=asiah
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on April 17, 2016, 09:00:10 pm
From the update currently in progress:

Code: [Select]
Processed 192 highway systems.
Processed 21738 routes with a total of 480738 points and 459000 segments.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on May 07, 2016, 10:43:38 am
I would not say this is a huge issue but looking at my stats (http://tm.teresco.org/user/?u=markkos1992) I saw this:

Stats by Region
Pennsylvania-Percent Clinched 11.3% (only showing one decimal place)

Stats by System (always showing two decimal places, even showing 0.00%)
US Interstate Highways-Percent Clinched 10.70%
US Future Interstate Highways 7.60%

Basically, do we want the statistics to be consistent to two decimal places, 3 significant figures, etc. or is this such a non-issue to where I am making an issue out of nothing?
I also snipped a copy of it for myself in case I send in another update.

-Mark
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 29, 2016, 04:02:11 pm
Quote from: Markkos1992 on May 07, 2016, 10:43:38 am
I would not say this is a huge issue but looking at my stats (http://tm.teresco.org/user/?u=markkos1992) I saw this:

Stats by Region
Pennsylvania-Percent Clinched 11.3% (only showing one decimal place)

Stats by System (always showing two decimal places, even showing 0.00%)
US Interstate Highways-Percent Clinched 10.70%
US Future Interstate Highways 7.60%

Basically, do we want the statistics to be consistent to two decimal places, 3 significant figures, etc. or is this such a non-issue to where I am making an issue out of nothing?
I also snipped a copy of it for myself in case I send in another update.

-Mark

Am I reading correctly that the issue here is that there's a trailing 0 on the percentages in systems but not in regions? If so, I just fixed it.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 29, 2016, 04:05:54 pm
Our data has grown since I last reported this about 6 weeks ago:

Code: [Select]
Processed 201 highway systems.
Processed 23612 routes with a total of 501626 points and 478014 segments.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on May 29, 2016, 06:26:25 pm
Quote from: Jim on May 29, 2016, 04:02:11 pm
Quote from: Markkos1992 on May 07, 2016, 10:43:38 am
I would not say this is a huge issue but looking at my stats (http://tm.teresco.org/user/?u=markkos1992) I saw this:

Stats by Region
Pennsylvania-Percent Clinched 11.3% (only showing one decimal place)

Stats by System (always showing two decimal places, even showing 0.00%)
US Interstate Highways-Percent Clinched 10.70%
US Future Interstate Highways 7.60%

Basically, do we want the statistics to be consistent to two decimal places, 3 significant figures, etc. or is this such a non-issue to where I am making an issue out of nothing?
I also snipped a copy of it for myself in case I send in another update.

-Mark

Am I reading correctly that the issue here is that there's a trailing 0 on the percentages in systems but not in regions? If so, I just fixed it.

Yes, that was basically my point.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 31, 2016, 04:14:57 pm
A good statistic: there are currently 0 non-FP datacheck errors being reported for active systems.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on June 17, 2016, 08:30:35 am
As some of you are aware, I use our project's data to create graphs (the mathematical/data structure with vertices and edges) that I use in academic projects.  My efforts this week have been to generate those within the Python site update program rather than as a post-processing step, and I've made a lot of progress.  Anyway, I now have a graph of all of our active and preview that has 329,559 vertices and 357,536 edges.  Each vertex represents one or more colocated waypoints (the colocated waypoints of intersecting or concurrent routes are collapsed to a single vertex) and each edge represents a pair of waypoints that are connected by one or more routes.  Again, concurrent routes are represented by a single edge.  By comparison, when I last generated these graphs a few years ago from CHM data, there were 263,705 vertices and 288,298 edges.

I've also been able to generate graphs for each region, and the following lists each region that has at least one active or preview route in TM with the number of vertices and number of edges in that region's graph.  The variety of sizes here is one of the great values of this data to my academic project.  Students can use the small graphs for initial implementation and testing, then move on to larger graphs for more extensive testing and empirical analysis of algorithm complexity.

Code: [Select]
AB (2812,2932)
ABW (27,36)
AFG (686,686)
AK (1464,1460)
AL (3075,3170)
ALA (63,59)
ALB (617,616)
AND (48,46)
AR (1991,2014)
ARM (508,515)
AUT (971,977)
AZ (2139,2197)
AZE (440,438)
BC (4443,4485)
BEL (986,1009)
BGD (323,323)
BGR (940,967)
BIH (306,303)
BLR (665,671)
BRB (86,105)
BRN (44,42)
BTN (167,166)
CA (2648,2710)
CHE (735,736)
CHN-AH (389,393)
CHN-BJ (229,232)
CHN-CQ (396,403)
CHN-FJ (546,554)
CHN-GD (691,703)
CHN-GS (521,517)
CHN-GX (435,441)
CHN-GZ (500,502)
CHN-HA (454,459)
CHN-HB (566,572)
CHN-HE (630,632)
CHN-HI (100,100)
CHN-HN (543,546)
CHN-HL (571,570)
CHN-JL (346,348)
CHN-JS (432,440)
CHN-JX (469,472)
CHN-LN (577,586)
CHN-NM (665,662)
CHN-NX (161,162)
CHN-QH (399,398)
CHN-SC (662,667)
CHN-SD (536,548)
CHN-SH (111,111)
CHN-SN (843,856)
CHN-SX (439,443)
CHN-TJ (92,91)
CHN-XJ (779,777)
CHN-XZ (324,323)
CHN-YN (812,808)
CHN-ZJ (489,498)
CO (3210,3435)
CRM (117,116)
CT (1942,2416)
CYP (290,303)
CZE (984,990)
DC (63,58)
DE (652,650)
DEU (4377,4318)
DNK (1183,1263)
ENG (12969,15611)
ESP (5769,5807)
EST (500,510)
FIN (4173,4298)
FL (2563,2706)
FRA (6449,6609)
FRH (198,210)
GA (3158,3370)
GEO (381,384)
GLP (115,121)
GRC (1215,1210)
GU (124,148)
GUF (98,98)
HI (554,577)
HKG (190,201)
HRV (439,437)
HUN (590,595)
IA (3429,3759)
ID (2029,2104)
IDN (254,250)
IL (4439,5218)
IMN (141,169)
IN (3207,3853)
IND-AP (192,190)
IND-AS (49,48)
IND-BR (97,95)
IND-CT (49,48)
IND-DL (33,30)
IND-GJ (14,13)
IND-HR (60,56)
IND-JH (38,36)
IND-KA (163,162)
IND-MH (346,344)
IND-ML (37,36)
IND-MN (45,44)
IND-MP (195,192)
IND-NL (31,30)
IND-OR (149,147)
IND-PB (56,54)
IND-RJ (22,19)
IND-TG (115,112)
IND-TN (173,172)
IND-UP (189,185)
IND-UT (15,14)
IND-WB (133,131)
IRL (1647,1707)
IRN (1862,1863)
ISR (110,109)
ITA (2983,2976)
JAM (232,238)
JEY (49,53)
KAZ (2280,2289)
KGZ (361,359)
KHM (250,249)
KOR (1087,1124)
KS (3632,3932)
KY (13272,16963)
LA (1430,1503)
LAO (507,506)
LKA (115,113)
LTU (423,436)
LUX (841,925)
LVA (447,455)
MA (2280,2762)
MAF (7,6)
MAR (287,283)
MB (216,217)
MD (3681,3284)
MDA (351,353)
ME (3919,4296)
MEX-BC (69,67)
MEX-BCS (7,6)
MEX-CHIH (81,73)
MEX-CHIS (47,43)
MEX-COAH (25,20)
MEX-COL (16,14)
MEX-DF (21,18)
MEX-DGO (72,70)
MEX-GRO (71,65)
MEX-GTO (38,35)
MEX-HGO (46,36)
MEX-JAL (83,80)
MEX-MICH (100,93)
MEX-MOR (46,41)
MEX-NAY (47,43)
MEX-NL (48,43)
MEX-OAX (30,28)
MEX-PUE (109,95)
MEX-QRO (26,24)
MEX-QROO (6,5)
MEX-SIN (79,74)
MEX-SLP (48,43)
MEX-SON (59,56)
MEX-TAB (5,4)
MEX-TAM (12,10)
MEX-TLAX (34,25)
MEX-VER (100,91)
MEX-YUC (11,10)
MEX-ZAC (22,19)
MKD (234,235)
MI (3950,4270)
MLT (173,197)
MMR (580,578)
MN (4910,5320)
MNE (353,356)
MO (6466,7072)
MP (190,237)
MS (1705,1738)
MT (4115,4320)
MTQ (85,91)
MYS (783,789)
MYT (42,40)
NB (2840,3077)
NC (5964,7130)
NCL (157,156)
ND (1936,2100)
NE (3415,3758)
NH (2400,2664)
NIR (1012,1121)
NJ (2154,2385)
NL (265,264)
NLD (1343,1395)
NM (3452,3750)
NOR (4263,4291)
NPL (306,305)
NS (1711,1861)
NT (543,539)
NV (1798,1833)
NY (8110,9261)
NZL (112,105)
OH (11088,12932)
OK (3924,4468)
ON (3931,3999)
OR (4407,4584)
PA (9140,9123)
PAK (929,932)
PE (1114,1507)
PHL (92,89)
POL (1457,1458)
PR (241,240)
PRK (145,142)
PRT (1094,1108)
PYF (237,242)
QC (995,982)
REU (122,128)
RI (539,687)
RKS (191,195)
ROU (4571,4775)
RUS (5520,5526)
SC (3800,4763)
SCT (3995,4337)
SD (2048,2235)
SGP (117,124)
SK (264,260)
SPM (12,10)
SRB (466,461)
SVK (487,489)
SVN (553,562)
SWE (2203,2208)
THA (948,952)
TJK (594,597)
TKM (406,404)
TN (2436,2615)
TUN (64,61)
TUR (2203,2185)
TWN (259,263)
TX (13333,15049)
UKR (1682,1700)
UT (2423,2534)
UZB (638,642)
VA (4963,5812)
VI (237,325)
VNM (621,620)
VT (1367,1525)
WA (3315,3514)
WI (4881,5533)
WLF (42,48)
WLS (1682,1836)
WV (3234,3382)
WY (2351,2466)
YT (1186,1181)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on July 04, 2016, 11:29:13 pm
Today's addition of deub3 as a preview system moved TM to over 800,000 miles of clinchable highways in the active and preview systems taken together.  Thanks to all who have contributed and continue to contribute to our highway data expansion!
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: mapcat on July 04, 2016, 11:38:16 pm
Nice! Any goals in mind for end-of-year?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on July 31, 2016, 12:20:13 am
We've had some new users submit list files this week, bringing us to 136 list files loaded into the update currently in progress.  Over 100 of those have been created or updated in the last 6 months, so I'd consider most to be active users.

Over 24,000 .wpt files are now processed as part of a site update.

The SQL file that repopulates the database on each site update is now over 4,000,000 lines long.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on August 08, 2016, 12:12:23 pm
For a paper I'm writing about the graphs I generate from the TM data, I wanted to see the distribution of edge lengths in the "tm-master.tmg" graph.  I thought an exponential distribution would be most useful.  Units are miles:

Code: [Select]
Edge length distribution (exponential):
0.0 <= len < 0.125: 4308
0.125 <= len < 0.25: 9289
0.25 <= len < 0.5: 23572
0.5 <= len < 1.0: 50177
1.0 <= len < 2.0: 73762
2.0 <= len < 4.0: 71648
4.0 <= len < 8.0: 47886
8.0 <= len < 16.0: 11255
16.0 <= len < 32.0: 1760
32.0 <= len < 64.0: 333
64.0 <= len < 128.0: 44
128.0 <= len < 256.0: 6

This is the graph that has hidden waypoints collapsed, so the lengths are essentially lengths between visible points in our .wpt files.

I was a bit surprised that we had 50 places where it's over 64 miles between visible points.  Here they are:

Code: [Select]
E123/AH62@ImeKom to E123/AH62@Syu via E123,AH62 length 211.0824
AH4@Qah to AH4@X208 via AH4 length 150.6198
AH42@ChaRd to AH42@YiLoc via AH42 length 150.4283
AH32@BayNuur to AH32@A22_W via AH32 length 148.6031
AH42@S308 to AH42@Tan via AH42 length 142.8158
E003@Min to E003@R180_W via E003 length 131.0283
E003@Bar to E003@Dar via E003 length 113.3032
AH32@Bay_W to AH32@BayOvoo via AH32 length 109.4872
G0613@Yen to G0613@G214_Zhe via G0613 length 107.4038
AH2@Dal_E to AH2@AhmWal via AH2 length 106.5611
BC97@BucRivPP to BC97@Rd254 via BC97 length 105.9764
G3011/AH42 to AH42@S308 via AH42 length 102.0576
AH78@Rav_N to AH78@Nay via AH78 length 102.0325
AH2@Fah to AH2@Nos via AH2 length 97.6226
AH32@Urg to AH32@Durv via AH32 length 91.2911
G50@S233 to G50@G318_Lib via G50 length 91.0735
AH3@Ula to AH3@Urg via AH3 length 90.5063
AH75@R92_E to AH75@Kha via AH75 length 88.5040
AH70@R36_E to AH70@Jan via AH70 length 87.5963
AH32@G45/G1202&G12@G45/G1202&G45@G12/G1202&G1202@G12/G45 to G45@X147 via G45 length 84.8840
AH4@Tol_E to AH4@A17&AH32@A3 via AH4 length 84.4882
E40Nuk/AH63@Jas to E40Nuk@Kar&AH63@Kar_W via E40Nuk,AH63 length 84.4761
BC97/BC97Con@BC/YT to BC97@LiaRivPP via BC97 length 82.3130
G65_S/G78_E to AH1@G65_N&G65@G80_E&G80@G65_N via G65 length 78.7951
AH32@Durv to AH32@Ald via AH32 length 77.1011
AH1@AFG/IRN to AH1@JamiRd via AH1 length 76.7270
AH77@Awb to AH77@Puni via AH77 length 76.1823
AH2@Taf to AH2@NokKun via AH2 length 75.2716
AH4@Tas|CHN-XJ to AH4@CHN/PAK via AH4 length 74.9304
AH4@Alt to AH4@Ton via AH4 length 74.4814
AH3@Air to AH3@Sai_N via AH3 length 73.6239
AH51@Dar to AH51@ZhobWanaRd via AH51 length 73.4893
G5012@S2/S20 to G65/G5012 via G5012 length 72.1187
G56_E/G76_E to G56(621)/G4215 via G56 length 72.0961
BC37@NinPP to BC37/BC37A via BC37 length 72.0237
AH42@GonExpy&G6Hai@G0613&G0613@G6 to AH42/G6Hai@G109_Das via AH42,G6Hai length 71.5764
AH1@FarRd to AH1/AH71 via AH1 length 71.0943
G35@HuaRd to G35/G72 via G35 length 70.5915
BC37@CasRd to BC37@BouSt via BC37 length 70.3705
AH70@R36_W to AH70@ToR44 via AH70 length 70.0952
AH6@X904 to AH6@Bay_W via AH6 length 69.4362
AH71@Kha_N to AH71@FarRd via AH71 length 69.2148
G42@S312_Wudu to G42@HB/CQ via G42 length 68.9330
E6Kir@Rv92_E&Rv92@E6_E to E6Kir@E75_S&E75@E6_W via E6Kir length 68.2212
AH2@NokKun to AH2@Yak via AH2 length 68.1582
G3012Yar@G315_YenS to G3012Yar@SanExpy via G3012Yar length 66.6719
M41@Karo to M41@Ran via M41 length 66.6389
NT3@ChanLakeTP to NT3@MosCrkTr via NT3 length 65.7823
AH2@R82_N&AH70@R82 to AH2@Anar_W&AH70@Anar via AH2,AH70 length 64.9629
NT1@WalCrkTr to NT1/NT3 via NT1 length 64.0154
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: oscar on August 08, 2016, 02:55:47 pm
Quote from: Jim on August 08, 2016, 12:12:23 pm
I was a bit surprised that we had 50 places where it's over 64 miles between visible points.  Here they are:

Code: [Select]
E123/AH62@ImeKom to E123/AH62@Syu via E123,AH62 length 211.0824
AH4@Qah to AH4@X208 via AH4 length 150.6198
AH42@ChaRd to AH42@YiLoc via AH42 length 150.4283
AH32@BayNuur to AH32@A22_W via AH32 length 148.6031
AH42@S308 to AH42@Tan via AH42 length 142.8158
E003@Min to E003@R180_W via E003 length 131.0283
E003@Bar to E003@Dar via E003 length 113.3032
AH32@Bay_W to AH32@BayOvoo via AH32 length 109.4872
G0613@Yen to G0613@G214_Zhe via G0613 length 107.4038
AH2@Dal_E to AH2@AhmWal via AH2 length 106.5611
BC97@BucRivPP to BC97@Rd254 via BC97 length 105.9764
G3011/AH42 to AH42@S308 via AH42 length 102.0576
AH78@Rav_N to AH78@Nay via AH78 length 102.0325
AH2@Fah to AH2@Nos via AH2 length 97.6226
AH32@Urg to AH32@Durv via AH32 length 91.2911
G50@S233 to G50@G318_Lib via G50 length 91.0735
AH3@Ula to AH3@Urg via AH3 length 90.5063
AH75@R92_E to AH75@Kha via AH75 length 88.5040
AH70@R36_E to AH70@Jan via AH70 length 87.5963
AH32@G45/G1202&G12@G45/G1202&G45@G12/G1202&G1202@G12/G45 to G45@X147 via G45 length 84.8840
AH4@Tol_E to AH4@A17&AH32@A3 via AH4 length 84.4882
E40Nuk/AH63@Jas to E40Nuk@Kar&AH63@Kar_W via E40Nuk,AH63 length 84.4761
BC97/BC97Con@BC/YT to BC97@LiaRivPP via BC97 length 82.3130
G65_S/G78_E to AH1@G65_N&G65@G80_E&G80@G65_N via G65 length 78.7951
AH32@Durv to AH32@Ald via AH32 length 77.1011
AH1@AFG/IRN to AH1@JamiRd via AH1 length 76.7270
AH77@Awb to AH77@Puni via AH77 length 76.1823
AH2@Taf to AH2@NokKun via AH2 length 75.2716
AH4@Tas|CHN-XJ to AH4@CHN/PAK via AH4 length 74.9304
AH4@Alt to AH4@Ton via AH4 length 74.4814
AH3@Air to AH3@Sai_N via AH3 length 73.6239
AH51@Dar to AH51@ZhobWanaRd via AH51 length 73.4893
G5012@S2/S20 to G65/G5012 via G5012 length 72.1187
G56_E/G76_E to G56(621)/G4215 via G56 length 72.0961
BC37@NinPP to BC37/BC37A via BC37 length 72.0237
AH42@GonExpy&G6Hai@G0613&G0613@G6 to AH42/G6Hai@G109_Das via AH42,G6Hai length 71.5764
AH1@FarRd to AH1/AH71 via AH1 length 71.0943
G35@HuaRd to G35/G72 via G35 length 70.5915
BC37@CasRd to BC37@BouSt via BC37 length 70.3705
AH70@R36_W to AH70@ToR44 via AH70 length 70.0952
AH6@X904 to AH6@Bay_W via AH6 length 69.4362
AH71@Kha_N to AH71@FarRd via AH71 length 69.2148
G42@S312_Wudu to G42@HB/CQ via G42 length 68.9330
E6Kir@Rv92_E&Rv92@E6_E to E6Kir@E75_S&E75@E6_W via E6Kir length 68.2212
AH2@NokKun to AH2@Yak via AH2 length 68.1582
G3012Yar@G315_YenS to G3012Yar@SanExpy via G3012Yar length 66.6719
M41@Karo to M41@Ran via M41 length 66.6389
NT3@ChanLakeTP to NT3@MosCrkTr via NT3 length 65.7823
AH2@R82_N&AH70@R82 to AH2@Anar_W&AH70@Anar via AH2,AH70 length 64.9629
NT1@WalCrkTr to NT1/NT3 via NT1 length 64.0154

I don't know about the others, but the ones for NT, and at least one of the three for BC, there really are no intersections with named roads (or even named hiking trails, as with the two NT entries) for those segments of Arctic highways.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on August 08, 2016, 05:28:39 pm
Quote from: oscar on August 08, 2016, 02:55:47 pm
I don't know about the others, but the ones for NT, and at least one of the three for BC, there really are no intersections with named roads (or even named hiking trails, as with the two NT entries) for those segments of Arctic highways.

That was my assumption.  I have no problem with these long stretches existing where they make sense.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on December 21, 2016, 12:19:29 pm
We are under 25 commits to the HighwayData repository from reaching 10,000.  I hope the 10,000th will be a good one!
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on December 21, 2016, 12:43:46 pm
Quote from: Jim on December 21, 2016, 12:19:29 pm
I hope the 10,000th will be a good one!

How many commits out of 9,975 have been bad? ;)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 21, 2016, 02:19:31 pm
Quote from: michih on December 21, 2016, 12:43:46 pm
How many commits out of 9,975 have been bad? ;)
I know I've done at least a couple that made zero changes to zero files...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on January 31, 2017, 10:16:50 pm
Two new users submitted files today, making tonight's site update the first that will ingest list files from 150 users.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on February 24, 2017, 11:59:39 pm
We have passed 900,000 miles of active+preview routes.  Well done all!  How long before we can get to 1 million?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on February 25, 2017, 03:10:14 am
It took almost 8 months from the 800,000 miles to the 900,000 miles milestone. I guess we might reach 1m by the end of the year.

btw: both milestones were "caused" by me :D
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on February 28, 2017, 01:31:58 am
I'm almost tempted to say we're at one Irv, but nay... it would be nice to call an Irv a nice round number, but it isn't a constant unit of measure. Rather, one Irv is the number of miles on Irv Gordon's 1966 1800S. Which is somewhere over 3 million. Once TM has more mileage than Irv -- now THAT will be a milestone!
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 30, 2017, 10:53:20 pm
We've exceeded 20,000 routes in active systems.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on June 17, 2017, 06:40:03 am
We've exceeded 30,000 routes in active+preview systems.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on June 18, 2017, 02:49:03 am
We have 7 travelers with more than 100,000mi in active+preview now. Congrats to froggie :)

The candidates to join the club next are okroads, mapmikey and mefailenglish which have a little bit more than 90,000mi now.

I'll only exceed 50,000mi soon.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on June 18, 2017, 10:30:20 pm
Hit mine just in active only.  Finally updated some of my lists (namely Virginia...still only partway through that).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: bejacob on June 19, 2017, 10:17:35 am
I'm looking to hit 100,000 miles in active systems this year. Already there in active +preview. Not sure where I'll be driving yet. I have some around Omaha in August. I keep planning to "sneak"  ;) across the state line into Indiana to clinch my last couple segments of I-69 between Indianapolis and Fort Wayne. I've mainly been collecting counties west of the Mississippi this year, so travels closer to home have been minimal. On the plus side, I'll be picking up a bunch of mileage in Wales at the end of summer.

I think I can pick up another 1,800 miles in active systems this year. We'll see. It's good to have goals.  :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: mapcat on June 19, 2017, 12:27:37 pm
Quote from: bejacob on June 19, 2017, 10:17:35 am
I'm looking to hit 100,000 miles in active systems this year. Already there in active +preview. Not sure where I'll be driving yet. I have some around Omaha in August. I keep planning to "sneak"  ;) across the state line into Indiana to clinch my last couple segments of I-69 between Indianapolis and Fort Wayne. I've mainly been collecting counties west of the Mississippi this year, so travels closer to home have been minimal. On the plus side, I'll be picking up a bunch of mileage in Wales at the end of summer.

I think I can pick up another 1,800 miles in active systems this year. We'll see. It's good to have goals.  :)

No interest in clinching usaoh? Cheapest way to 100,000.  :D  Or, in your case, 108,000.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on June 20, 2017, 03:28:30 am
I might go to New Hampshire again some day...  ::)

On a more serious note, one of these days I'm going to have to pick off some of the last of the low-hanging fruit in York/Cumberland/Oxford counties. I know that @deathtopumpkins has more USAME mileage than me... Just how much, I'm not certain, as there are a few broken lines in his .list file for recently updated routes. And, well -- this simply will not do.  8)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: bejacob on June 20, 2017, 08:34:17 am
Quote from: mapcat on June 19, 2017, 12:27:37 pm
Quote from: bejacob on June 19, 2017, 10:17:35 am
I'm looking to hit 100,000 miles in active systems this year. Already there in active +preview. Not sure where I'll be driving yet. I have some around Omaha in August. I keep planning to "sneak"  ;) across the state line into Indiana to clinch my last couple segments of I-69 between Indianapolis and Fort Wayne. I've mainly been collecting counties west of the Mississippi this year, so travels closer to home have been minimal. On the plus side, I'll be picking up a bunch of mileage in Wales at the end of summer.

I think I can pick up another 1,800 miles in active systems this year. We'll see. It's good to have goals.  :)

No interest in clinching usaoh? Cheapest way to 100,000.  :D  Or, in your case, 108,000.

Interest, yes. Inclination, not at the moment.

I'm working on it from time to time. I've covered all the routes in Franklin county (where I live) and in all the adjacent counties with the exception of OH47 in Union county. I've even driven a fair bit of the counties that touch those surrounding counties.  I'll probably work on the remaining usaus routes in OH first picking up whichever usaoh routes I can in the process.

My travel priorities are
County seat visit always take precedence. In the last couple years, I've factored in highway clinching to my travels. They do tend to dovetail reasonably well. I've still got a ways to go on collecting counties http://www.mob-rule.com/user/bejacob (http://www.mob-rule.com/user/bejacob). I know many TM users understand. :D
 
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: sipes23 on June 20, 2017, 10:51:26 pm
Quote from: yakra on June 20, 2017, 03:28:30 am
I might go to New Hampshire again some day...  ::)

On a more serious note, one of these days I'm going to have to pick off some of the last of the low-hanging fruit in York/Cumberland/Oxford counties. I know that @deathtopumpkins has more USAME mileage than me... Just how much, I'm not certain, as there are a few broken lines in his .list file for recently updated routes. And, well -- this simply will not do.  8)

It distresses me that I'm in 5th place in Maine. Of course, being in Wyoming isn't helping that situation. It also distresses me that I'm not in 1st place in Wyoming. I suspect that will be rectified by the end of the summer--unless Spui Ninja really racks up the miles.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: the_spui_ninja on June 24, 2017, 11:26:14 am
Quote from: sipes23 on June 20, 2017, 10:51:26 pm
It distresses me that I'm in 5th place in Maine. Of course, being in Wyoming isn't helping that situation. It also distresses me that I'm not in 1st place in Wyoming. I suspect that will be rectified by the end of the summer--unless Spui Ninja really racks up the miles.

Come at me bro!  ;D

I guess it makes more sense for you to be 1st in WY since you live there; I only live REALLY REALLY close to WY (i.e. I can go for a run in WY at home even though I live in SD).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Rothman on July 27, 2017, 02:14:41 pm
A tangential note looking at the 158 users that have clinched interstate mileage:

The state in which the highest number of users that have clinched some interstate mileage is Pennsylvania: 133.  Not surprising, but I could think of other states I might have guessed as well (Ohio, Illinois or Texas).

Puerto Rico has the lowest at 12.  Alaska's at 18.  Hawaii = 26.

Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on August 15, 2017, 10:54:09 pm
With a couple new preview systems we are now over 1 million clinchable miles!  Thanks to all who contribute.  That's an amazing number.

Have to say I really like seeing my usanp travels on my maps!
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on September 29, 2017, 10:54:06 pm
With 2 new activations tonight, we are at 200 active systems!  Thanks to all who have made this possible.  It looks like we had 97 active systems when we brought over CHM data a few years ago.  I continue to be amazed by and very grateful to all of you who continue to expand and improve our highway data.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on September 30, 2017, 03:41:43 am
The last 15 systems are from Si.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on September 30, 2017, 05:40:38 am
Quote from: michih on September 30, 2017, 03:41:43 am
The last 15 systems are from Si.
Really? Certainly usatn, islth and swel weren't that long ago (swel was the 14th most recent by my count, islth the 15th, usatn the 16th). The last 13, sure!

I guess it helps to have had lots of small and simple systems ready and waiting for a binge of peer-review from you. Also, it's been a month since I peer-reviewed something, so I better get on that.

The system binge will dry up soon as our 'Tier 4' drive is nearly over. 2 Canadian Provinces, 5 US States and 1 US Territory on Preview, 1 Canadian Province, 4 US States and 1 US Territory not there yet. 5 European countries on Preview and 3 not there yet.

Sure there's a few other things (Europe Tier 5, things like New York Parkways, National Park Highways, etc), and there's always Asia, Africa and Australia, but we're slowly moving towards a point where the project is almost entirely maintenance and not much creation.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on September 30, 2017, 05:51:19 am
Quote from: si404 on September 30, 2017, 05:40:38 am
Quote from: michih on September 30, 2017, 03:41:43 am
The last 15 systems are from Si.
Really? Certainly usatn, islth and swel weren't that long ago (swel was the 14th most recent by my count, islth the 15th, usatn the 16th). The last 13, sure!

Ok, I've counted asiah 3 times because there are 3 system update entries for Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Ib3kii on October 02, 2017, 10:11:24 am
Quote from: Rothman on July 27, 2017, 02:14:41 pm
The state in which the highest number of users that have clinched some interstate mileage is Pennsylvania: 133.
I find it funny I've never even been near Pennsylvania. I should probably head east sometime...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on November 25, 2017, 10:43:15 pm
At the moment, we have exactly 23,000 routes in active systems.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on December 01, 2017, 10:13:33 pm
mapcat's list file pull request today was the 1000th pull request on the UserData repository.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on March 21, 2018, 09:48:59 pm
We have recently passed 40,000 routes in active and preview systems.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on April 03, 2018, 10:25:25 pm
We now have over 500,000 unique locations used as waypoints in some TM route.  503,967 at the moment, to be exact.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on April 04, 2018, 07:18:01 pm
I added a bunch when I finally updated my list for Tennessee...noted nobody's included several of the TN routes I've been on.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on April 05, 2018, 05:20:01 pm
I think Jim refers to the  number of unique locations (second to last line) (http://tm.teresco.org/logs/siteupdate.log) in TM routes - not waypoints used by TM travelers.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: mapcat on May 26, 2018, 05:20:56 pm
Just noticed we have 200 users now.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on June 08, 2018, 01:36:09 am
What is the single longest, by mileage, root file in the project?
Can be in an active, preview, or even devel system. Nothing commented out, though.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on June 08, 2018, 03:59:44 am
I think you've analyzed it and you want us to guess? I think it might be this: http://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?u=michih&r=rus.ah030
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on June 08, 2018, 07:40:32 am
The TM database knows, but I won't give the answer in case this is a trivia question instead of a request for this information.  The one @michih mentions is the 7th-longest.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on June 08, 2018, 07:49:09 am
Quote from: Jim on June 08, 2018, 07:40:32 am
The one @michih mentions is the 7th-longest.
Though it is the longest that is also an entire connected route.

There's 11 roots over 1500 miles (worked out manually).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on June 08, 2018, 12:27:11 pm
Not a trivia question. Request for info. :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on June 08, 2018, 01:25:46 pm
Here's your top 10:

+------------+--------+-------+--------+--------+--------+--------------+---------+
| systemName | region | route | banner | abbrev | city   | root         | mileage |
+------------+--------+-------+--------+--------+--------+--------------+---------+
| asiah      | RUS    | AH6   |        | Irk    | Irkusk | rus.ah006irk | 2657.65 |
| eure       | RUS    | E30   |        |        |        | rus.e30      |  2066.9 |
| eure       | RUS    | E22   |        |        |        | rus.e22      | 1967.68 |
| asiah      | RUS    | AH8   |        |        |        | rus.ah008    | 1897.87 |
| eure       | RUS    | E105  |        |        |        | rus.e105     | 1833.21 |
| asiah      | RUS    | AH6   |        |        |        | rus.ah006    | 1799.98 |
| asiah      | RUS    | AH30  |        |        |        | rus.ah030    |  1716.3 |
| argrn      | ARG    | RN3   |        |        | (Main) | arg.rn003    | 1665.57 |
| asiah      | KAZ    | AH61  |        |        |        | kaz.ah061    | 1638.46 |
| asiah      | MNG    | AH32  |        |        |        | mng.ah032    | 1568.76 |
+------------+--------+-------+--------+--------+--------+--------------+---------+
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on June 08, 2018, 02:01:35 pm
Anyone want to guess the 11th that is over 1500 miles?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on June 08, 2018, 04:27:32 pm
No, but rus.ah006irk should be rus.ah006 and arg.rn040 (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Route_40_(Argentina)) might soon beat them all (> 3,000mi) :D
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on June 09, 2018, 02:55:50 pm
Quote from: michih on June 08, 2018, 04:27:32 pm
No, but rus.ah006irk should be rus.ah006
Why? Yes, the former is 857.67 miles (32.3%) longer than the latter, but it's clearly the case that people are much more likely to drive in European Russia than Siberia. As such, the European Russian bit is more major.

The 11th over 1500 miles is the AH4 in China (all in Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region). Over half of that distance is freeway!
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on June 10, 2018, 06:37:25 am
Quote from: si404 on June 09, 2018, 02:55:50 pm
the former is 857.67 miles (32.3%) longer than the latter
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Bickendan on June 10, 2018, 02:26:17 pm
I find it amusing that BC 97 doesn't even make the list.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on June 10, 2018, 04:38:54 pm
Quote from: Bickendan on June 10, 2018, 02:26:17 pm
I find it amusing that BC 97 doesn't even make the list.

Comes in at #18 but #1 in the western hemisphere.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on June 11, 2018, 10:42:51 am
Quote from: Jim on June 10, 2018, 04:38:54 pm
Comes in at #18 but #1 in the western hemisphere.
Err, Argentina RN3?

I've heard some terrible definitions of 'Western Hemisphere' that exclude western Europe and western Africa (if you mean 'The Americas' then use it - it's shorter and far less arbitrary*!), but to exclude the southern hemisphere.  ::)


*a week ago I crossed the meridian twice and didn't notice until I'd done it - in Greenwich Park! The first was literally feet away from the observatory grounds and it wasn't marked and only when I got to the end of the path and saw that the other side of the fence was the courtyard with people taking photos of them with a leg either side of a metal plate running along the floor and beyond that London...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on June 14, 2018, 08:02:42 pm
We've recently blown past 20,000 commits to the HighwayData repository.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on June 15, 2018, 12:51:59 am
Northernmost point: NOR E69 End @ 71.166714°, 25.780427°
Westernmost point: WLF T1Fut Tol @ -14.251073°, -178.180518°
Easternmost point: NZL SH35 RanRd @ -37.795416°, 178.410419°
Southernmost point: ARG RN3Ush End_S @ -54.855220°, -68.576712°, having recently surpassed NZL SH1Wai End (-46.613277°, 168.357711°) by > 6 degrees.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on June 18, 2018, 12:21:14 am
There is only one shaping point in Washington DC.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/hwy_data/DC/usanp/dc.rockcrkpkwy.wpt#L9
Are there any regions with none?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on June 18, 2018, 03:44:17 am
Liechtenstein, Saint Martin and Saint Pierre and Miquelon have none. SPM has more than just the one route that's part of another system (LIE having part of cheh's H16, MAF having glpn's N7)

I've not bothered looking at places where all we have is one freeway route (eg Gabon).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on July 16, 2018, 07:55:32 am
We've added around 8 or 10 new users in the last week.  Easily the largest growth since the initial move from CHM.  Typically I'd see a new person once every couple weeks or so.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on July 16, 2018, 12:46:58 pm
We have 216 users now. 16 new users have joined in the last 7 weeks.

Quote from: mapcat on May 26, 2018, 05:20:56 pm
Just noticed we have 200 users now.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: compdude787 on July 18, 2018, 01:56:20 pm
Probably has to do with the move to the travelmapping.net domain.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on August 21, 2018, 11:13:55 pm
I realized my list file now has 3784 lines, which got me wondering how many people have files that long.  Mine is 16th longest.   One user (vespertine) has over 8000 lines, two more are over 7000, two more over 6000, and 2 more over 5000.  94 of our 224 users have at least 1000 lines in their list files.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on August 22, 2018, 06:43:21 am
I'd be one of the over 6K....
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on August 22, 2018, 09:50:55 am
Quote from: Jim on August 21, 2018, 11:13:55 pm
Mine is 16th longest.

You are 17th in total stats. I guess that the relation of total mileage and lines is more or less similar for all (oscar + mapcat are over 7k).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on August 22, 2018, 10:13:22 am
This reminds me of a very old exchange on CHM, soon after the expansion beyond Interstates meant more users had more lines in their files:

http://clinched.s2.bizhat.com/viewtopic.php?t=174

We have no coded limit on list file length in TM.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on August 22, 2018, 04:00:01 pm
Quote from: Jim on August 21, 2018, 11:13:55 pm
I realized my list file now has 3784 lines, which got me wondering how many people have files that long.  Mine is 16th longest.   One user (vespertine) has over 8000 lines, two more are over 7000, two more over 6000, and 2 more over 5000.  94 of our 224 users have at least 1000 lines in their list files.

I should have over 1000 lines (991 right now) once I send in the next update to my list file.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: cl94 on August 22, 2018, 04:35:13 pm
I crossed 1,900 lines with the cross-country trip I just finished. Only added a net of ~105 lines, though, as I closed some gaps in OH and IL as part of it, making the net gain roughly 0 in those states. Next big trip will likely toss me over 2,000, but who knows when that will happen.

I know a "new" user (that most of us know) will likely be getting his account up and running this winter. I would not be shocked if he joins the 5,000+ club once he has everything in, possibly higher.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on August 23, 2018, 02:39:15 am
Quote from: michih on August 22, 2018, 09:50:55 am
I guess that the relation of total mileage and lines is more or less similar for all (oscar + mapcat are over 7k).
Not really as something like

TX I-10 NM/TX TX/LA

is 1 line with nearly 900 miles for it, whereas my nearly 900 lines in England gets me less than 6000 miles.

If you've mostly done lengthy routes, and covered most of them, then your .list file is shorter for many more miles than someone who has mostly done short routes, or short bits of routes and so has lots of lines that contribute little to total mileage.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: bejacob on August 23, 2018, 08:15:29 am
Quote from: Jim on August 21, 2018, 11:13:55 pm
I realized my list file now has 3784 lines, which got me wondering how many people have files that long.  Mine is 16th longest.   One user (vespertine) has over 8000 lines, two more are over 7000, two more over 6000, and 2 more over 5000.  94 of our 224 users have at least 1000 lines in their list files.

Currently 6776 lines. Never really paid much attention to the "lines." I always just looked at the mileage. I did notice that I have traveled over 75,000 segments as well. Also something I overlooked in the past.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: osu-lsu on August 23, 2018, 02:50:02 pm
Well, my log file shows 1215 lines. Where as the stats board shows I've traveled 1195 routes.
What's the difference (besides the math)?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on August 23, 2018, 03:06:53 pm
Sometimes one line credits you with multiple routes:
ME I-295 4 9
is good for some of US1 and a little ME26.

And sometimes multiple lines only serve one route:
ME I-295 20 22
ME I-295 28 31

Looks like in your case the latter outweigh the former.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: vdeane on August 25, 2018, 03:12:41 pm
Mine currently (well, it will as of the next update) has 1359 lines.

Quote from: yakra on August 23, 2018, 03:06:53 pm
And sometimes multiple lines only serve one route:
ME I-295 20 22
ME I-295 28 31

Looks like in your case the latter outweigh the former.
Probably the same for me, since I include concurrencies where I know about them.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on September 02, 2018, 09:32:29 am
On the subject of lines, I took a trip yesterday that had the net effect of reducing the number of lines on my list by 13...basically filling gaps.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on September 30, 2018, 02:27:39 am
More than 10,000 forum posts now (this is 10,009). And more then 100,000 page views per month.

http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?action=stats
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on October 13, 2018, 02:42:19 am
The longest vertex label in any graph file, at 143 characters:

US129@US129/441BusWat_N&US129BusWat@US129_N&US441@US129/441BusWat_N&US441BusWat@US441_N&GA15@US129/441&GA24@US129/441BusWat_N&GA24BusWat@GA24_N

This is going to be very neato to look at in the HDX-lite (http://yakra.teresco.org/tmtools_demos/tmg2html/GA-region.tmg.html) and I shall surf it up posthaste! 8)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on October 14, 2018, 08:47:45 am
With the next site update we'll have more than 25,000 routes for more than 800,000 miles in 213 active systems :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on November 05, 2018, 04:21:33 pm
As of Nov  4 23:42 (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/tree/a46d6d9b7ca2f2f452f7e3ebe7123e109e51ced2), the WaypointQuadtree contains 46678 total nodes.

No, wait. This number should be 1 + a multiple of 4. Trying again...
62237 total nodes.
46678 would have been the number of bottom-level nodes actually containing waypoints.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on November 06, 2018, 12:21:22 pm
Once DataProcessing#122 (https://github.com/TravelMapping/DataProcessing/pull/122) gets merged, the WaypointQuadtree would have (for that same revision of the HighwayData repo):
42725 total nodes, with 32044 bottom-level nodes containing waypoints.
That leaves 10681 refined nodes that contain no waypoints, but only 4 child nodes.

10681 * 2 = 21362 = the number of edges it would take to make a visual representation of the QuadTree in .tmg format. (+2 for W & E boundaries on the whole thing if you wish, = 21364.) That's a bit smaller than usai-system-simple.tmg.

Taking the simple route and not merging colocated vertices, that's 42724 or 42728 vertices, a bit smaller than ASI-continent-simple.tmg.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on November 07, 2018, 01:08:09 pm
Just for fun, I made a graph of the WaypointQuadtree:
http://yakra.teresco.org/tests/tmg/Quadtree/WaypointQuadtree-good.tmg
http://yakra.teresco.org/tests/tmg/Quadtree/WaypointQuadtree-good.tmg.html

https://github.com/TravelMapping/DataProcessing/pull/126/files
The WaypointQuadtree has been initialized all these years with the latitude and longitude bounds swapped. It hasn't broken anything, but just led to a sub-optimal distribution of child nodes.
After fixing it, we're down from 42757 to 35165 total nodes with the latest HighwayData.

How does it affect the time to process the total siteupdate.py time, skipping graphs?
Total run time: [394.3] -> [390.1]
Probably not a significant difference.

Edit: Another fun potential project:
What are the deepest-level, geographically smallest nodes, and how many of this size are there?
Of these, which contain the most waypoints? The most unique locations?

The smallest refined node I've found with a bit of eyeball scanning is near the Maughan Library in Westminster:
Paste this into wptedit for a visual:
Code: [Select]
SW_A http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.503906&lon=-0.131836
NW http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.525879&lon=-0.131836
NE http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.525879&lon=-0.087891
SE http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.503906&lon=-0.087891
SW_B http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.503906&lon=-0.131836This node is itself refined into four sub-quadrants.
Which of these contains the most points or unique locations, as well as if there are more nodes of this size (or smaller) elsewhere, will take a programmatic solution.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on November 07, 2018, 04:31:26 pm
Quote from: yakra on November 07, 2018, 01:08:09 pm
the Maughan Library in Westminster
1) That is in the City of London - as seen by the City's Crest over its entrance, or the boundaries on the map). OK, over the road is part of the City of Westminster (but see 2).
2) No resident of that urban area would call that part of town over the road 'Westminster'. Most would be surprised to see that it was LB Westminster (even I, a map geek, was somewhat surprised it wasn't LB Camden like the area just to the north)

But other than that, proud that London is the most dense, and surprised it's that bit of it - missing some of the densest bits of Central London's road network and containing a lot of the least dense area within the 'Ring of Steel'.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on November 07, 2018, 05:09:43 pm
That's what I get for just doing a quick Wiki walk -- Maughan Library -> Strand Campus -> OK, that's where it is? Sure! :)
"LB" means London Borough, I take it?

A little more digging (No further programming yet, just some spreadsheetery) reveals:
This node is 13 steps away from the master node that represents the whole world.
It is the only node of this size.
How many points/unique locations it or its four children contain is still an open question.

How about nodes 12 steps away from the master node?
There are 20 of those, with the majority in the UK. Three are in Puerto Rico. One at the Cincinnati OH / Covington KY line. Seems natural, with dense road networks in these places. And there's one in... Portland, meaning I was probably a bit too generous with waypoints when designing US1Alt, ME77 & pals back in the day. :P

How about:
The least dense node with 1 or more waypoints?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on November 07, 2018, 07:15:54 pm
Quote from: yakra on November 07, 2018, 05:09:43 pm
"LB" means London Borough, I take it?
Yep.
Quote
How many points/unique locations it or its four children contain is still an open question.
For it: 51 points (non hidden, all but 7 junctions between two routes). 69 edges between them (one a concurrency) and 26 between them and points not inside the box (two a concurrency).

I copyied (roughly in terms of actual locations) the HDX across onto a screengrab of the wpteditor with the box on

(https://i.postimg.cc/8cqDDQVK/quadtree.png)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on November 07, 2018, 07:18:27 pm
Looks like we had almost the same idea. :D
(https://i.postimg.cc/SxZXFRvD/Quadtree-London.png)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on November 07, 2018, 08:03:34 pm
Here are the other 13th-level nodes, with a quick-n-dirty name I picked for each.

CodeQuick-n-Dirty Name
MAADCDCCCBDAAHosford-Abernethy
MABDDBADBBDACCarrick Hill
MABDDBBCADDCDBelfast-IMN Ferry
MABDDBBDCCDDCMoss Side
MABDDBCBBBACAHarold’s Cross
MABDDBDABBBABPoulton-Liscard-Egremont
MABDDBDABBBBAKensington
MABDDBDBCBCADSmethwick
MABDDBDBCBCBCDartmouth Circus
MABDDBDDBDBCDKensal Green - Harrow Road
MABDDBDDBDBDCEuston Square
MABDDBDDBDBDDMile End
MABDDBDDBDDBANine Elms Square
MABDDBDDBDDBBNew Cross Gate
MABDDDBDABAAASt Saviour, Jersey
MADAABBBCCCCAPortland ME
MADAACABBBDDACovington-Newport
MADCBACACDDBDJardines
MADCBACADCCAABuena Vista Santurce
MADCBACADCCACBosque Urbana del Neuvo Milenio

Go to yakra.teresco.org/tests/tmg/Quadtree/WaypointQuadtree.tmg.html
Zoom in a bit, search for the code in the vertex/edge list, and click.
Center your mouse, Alt+Tab away, move mouse away from canvas, Alt+Tab back*, and click the OSM or Google links.

*Yes, I plan to eventually improve (https://github.com/yakra/tmtools/issues/79) that...

OKAY I AM GOING TO CLOSE DOWN MY WEB BROWSER AND STEP AWAY FROM THE COMPUTER NOW
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on November 08, 2018, 01:56:17 am
Quote from: yakra on November 07, 2018, 01:08:09 pm
https://github.com/TravelMapping/DataProcessing/pull/126/files
The WaypointQuadtree has been initialized all these years with the latitude and longitude bounds swapped. It hasn't broken anything, but just led to a sub-optimal distribution of child nodes.
After fixing it, we're down from 42757 to 35165 total nodes with the latest HighwayData.
Compare these side-by-side in two browser tabs:
http://yakra.teresco.org/tests/tmg/Quadtree/WaypointQuadtree-good-NoMerc.tmg.html
http://yakra.teresco.org/tests/tmg/Quadtree/WaypointQuadtree-bug-NoMerc.tmg.html

With the bug, The nodes along the western edge of the map have their eastern boundaries, and centers, asymptotically approaching -90°, rather than the normal -180°.
The de facto W bound of each node is -90°, but points W of there can still be inserted normally, because they're W of the parent node's center -- be it 0°, -45°, -67.5°, -78.75°, etc.
As more points are added and these nodes are refined, they effectively become narrower and narrower "stripes" stretching all the way west.

The mirror image applies along the eastern edge, of course.

A couple of our final unrefined nodes:
Code: [Select]
NE_A http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.191956&lon=-89.998627
SE http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.189209&lon=-89.998627
SW http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.189209&lon=-90.000000
NW http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.191956&lon=-90.000000
NE_B http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.191956&lon=-89.998627
...
SE_A http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.131531&lon=-89.998627
SW http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.131531&lon=-90.000000
NW http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.134277&lon=-90.000000
NE http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.134277&lon=-89.998627
SE_B http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=35.131531&lon=-89.998627A bit smaller than central London, innit! ;)

With latitude, things are less interesting: there are just four extra nodes each N of the N pole & S of the S pole, that never receive any waypoints.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 13, 2018, 11:27:01 am
Quote from: Jim on August 21, 2018, 11:13:55 pm
I realized my list file now has 3784 lines, which got me wondering how many people have files that long.  Mine is 16th longest.   One user (vespertine) has over 8000 lines, two more are over 7000, two more over 6000, and 2 more over 5000.  94 of our 224 users have at least 1000 lines in their list files.
How many lines in the average .list file?
How many HighwaySegments does the average traveler have .listed?
I'm more interested in the number explicitly .listed, before concurrency augmentation takes place.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on December 13, 2018, 02:56:00 pm
Here are the current numbers of lines per .list file.  Note that some will be invalid lines, comments, or blank lines, so consider them a bit on the high side in many cases.  The average number of lines per file is 1235.8.

Code: [Select]
    8437 vespertine.list
    7930 mapcat.list
    7234 oscar.list
    7074 bejacob.list
    6364 froggie.list
    5877 chaddean.list
    5768 dharwood.list
    4937 okroads.list
    4463 charliezeb.list
    4332 mapmikey.list
    4213 ntallyn.list
    4144 justjake.list
    3972 lkefct.list
    3933 dcm55343.list
    3833 terescoj.list
    3833 michih.list
    3776 bhemphill.list
    3758 mefailenglish.list
    3492 duke87.list
    2963 htm_duke.list
    2919 terminal_moraine.list
    2782 valedc03ls.list
    2759 aaroads.list
    2743 skatcher.list
    2721 klundgren.list
    2719 johninkingwood.list
    2669 wadsteckel.list
    2665 ua747sp.list
    2460 dave1693.list
    2380 jeffm.list
    2347 jonfmorse.list
    2281 panda80.list
    2243 mikeandkristie.list
    2165 cinx.list
    2147 rlee.list
    2142 roadgeek_adam.list
    2110 cl94.list
    1925 barefoot_driver.list
    1922 sbeaver44.list
    1922 afarina.list
    1880 master_son.list
    1870 pnrrth.list
    1865 dfilpus.list
    1847 drebbin37.list
    1809 philimon.list
    1791 deathtopumpkins.list
    1714 bogdymol.list
    1709 lowenbrau.list
    1706 regoarrarr.list
    1688 squatchis.list
    1680 jerseyman4.list
    1668 julmac.list
    1625 hoopitypoop.list
    1623 ngrier.list
    1618 tikester.list
    1578 pahighways.list
    1570 sipes23.list
    1563 wphiii.list
    1550 mirage45331.list
    1548 nrm1221.list
    1497 hoss6884.list
    1495 imgoph.list
    1490 capn.list
    1470 quidditch33.list
    1466 gpw.list
    1456 niels.list
    1441 synkdorbit.list
    1438 dantheman.list
    1425 kramer.list
    1384 kjslaughter.list
    1383 vdeane.list
    1365 griffith.list
    1365 cabiness42.list
    1361 tckma.list
    1348 sneezy.list
    1336 dcharlie.list
    1316 1995hoo.list
    1284 norheim.list
    1284 new_friends_gr.list
    1270 codyg1985.list
    1259 osu_lsu.list
    1245 morriswa.list
    1236 bobcobb.list
    1232 si404.list
    1206 scott_stieglitz.list
    1182 mojavenc.list
    1144 keithcavey.list
    1118 jackgaynor.list
    1105 markkos1992.list
    1103 extremebandman.list
    1100 mc49399.list
    1086 ChrisZwolle.list
    1068 verruckte_dan.list
    1061 eucitizen.list
    1044 the_spui_ninja.list
    1033 njroadhorse.list
    1027 bickendan.list
    1024 gman2337.list
     960 angelsfreeek.list
     957 mwasleski.list
     955 yakra.list
     953 presidentman.list
     950 jwood.list
     921 jimvette.list
     915 tbwillie.list
     913 tag42481.list
     904 roadguy2.list
     898 jbum86MASTER.list
     889 ssgtcrusty.list
     888 crosboro7.list
     869 intheam.list
     864 spinoza.list
     844 Ugnaught2.list
     844 25or6to4.list
     841 JamesMD.list
     835 thefxexpert.list
     829 7_8.list
     828 jstalica.list
     826 clong.list
     817 dough4872.list
     815 baugh17.list
     794 thing342.list
     766 radison.list
     764 cougar1989.list
     763 navigator.list
     729 eth.list
     694 pianocello130.list
     691 osu97gp.list
     688 mvak36.list
     681 clark1mt.list
     654 neilbert.list
     652 iowahighways.list
     651 snowedin.list
     641 dgolub.list
     637 mariethefoxy.list
     625 tomhart.list
     615 highplainstrvlr.list
     613 epzik8.list
     597 w9tam.list
     593 roukan.list
     592 jpinyan.list
     591 Beerman.list
     574 hurricanehink.list
     572 Chikara.list
     566 twinsfan87.list
     564 eidderf.list
     541 DJCane.list
     492 lakewy17.list
     487 foresthills93.list
     483 drfrankenstein.list
     480 paulthemapguy.list
     480 opspe.list
     479 rschen7754.list
     476 yipcoyote.list
     476 rickmastfan67.list
     475 dnthrox.list
     475 bulldog1979.list
     458 route56.list
     455 neroute2.list
     448 lamsalfl.list
     436 jweeks.list
     431 snowmatt8.list
     429 based8.list
     424 ohroadscholar.list
     419 myselfalso.list
     408 tarheel61581.list
     404 inagaddadavida.list
     403 mr_matt_k.list
     392 rebelgtp.list
     386 jjbers.list
     382 cyhighways.list
     375 thehighwayman3561.list
     374 dscarroll.list
     370 jayhawkco.list
     330 bubaclex.list
     328 verumsolum.list
     303 dsm4cy.list
     303 compdude787.list
     292 voyager105.list
     290 ibexto.list
     287 dylucktrocket.list
     275 Aseluit.list
     263 dsaneus.list
     261 moshitea.list
     237 roadgeek99.list
     237 along.list
     207 georgiaroadgeek.list
     206 bm7.list
     205 atsiatas.list
     203 ran4sh.list
     192 intelati49.list
     191 slorydn1.list
     191 1.list
     190 xorodejon.list
     168 happy5214.list
     166 electronym.list
     162 tjj25.list
     161 peperodriguez2710.list
     150 paddy.list
     149 sounderbruce.list
     130 gimmicks.list
     128 xcvxcvxcv.list
     125 golubcar.list
     118 boris.list
     117 scheidler.list
     115 riiga.list
     113 harvey.list
     110 sammi.list
     108 es92.list
     103 skoutr1.list
      98 sercamaro.list
      88 finnedude.list
      75 jordancarrpeterson.list
      75 dctransit.list
      73 mepaulrye.list
      72 noelbotevera.list
      71 vinoman64.list
      70 kurzov.list
      66 whopperman.list
      66 sfisher.list
      66 philman.list
      62 vcap36.list
      60 polabare.list
      53 dognm16.list
      50 usaidhello.list
      45 Qiviuq.list
      35 robringstad.list
      26 rgentry.list
      26 ThelwallViaduct.list
      21 superblu2007.list
       8 riehlj.list
       8 YaxStarTest.list
       1 benjamingrove47.list
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 13, 2018, 06:20:23 pm
Quote from: yakra on December 13, 2018, 11:27:01 am
How many HighwaySegments does the average traveler have .listed?
I'm more interested in the number explicitly .listed, before concurrency augmentation takes place.
I'm working from a somewhat outdated version of the HighwayData repo here locally, but here's what I get:
4281202 traveler-segments. (More recent additions, such as usaal -> preview, are certain to increase this.)
Divided by 231 .list files, that's 18533.3 segments per .list.

Most-clinched segment is VA I-95 84 86, with 128 travelers.
Edit: There may be other segments tied at 128 travelers. I didn't check for more; this was simply the first one found.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on December 13, 2018, 09:21:52 pm
^^ According to my log, I have 6,100 "good lines".
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on December 14, 2018, 08:31:03 am
I was playing around with a little SQL this morning (isn't everyone?) and built a query that gives the number of TM "segments" clinched by user:

Code: [Select]
select traveler, count(*) as segments from clinched group by traveler order by segments desc;
Code: [Select]
+--------------------+----------+
| traveler           | segments |
+--------------------+----------+
| oscar              |   153495 |
| mapcat             |   150511 |
| vespertine         |   117445 |
| charliezeb         |   105478 |
| dharwood           |    83569 |
| froggie            |    80287 |
| bejacob            |    80211 |
| duke87             |    68985 |
| mefailenglish      |    68303 |
| mapmikey           |    65753 |
| valedc03ls         |    65667 |
| lkefct             |    64822 |
| okroads            |    64619 |
| michih             |    63874 |
| justjake           |    62768 |
| barefoot_driver    |    60315 |
| terminal_moraine   |    59856 |
| terescoj           |    59777 |
| aaroads            |    57313 |
| jonfmorse          |    54048 |
| bhemphill          |    48231 |
| pnrrth             |    47555 |
| ntallyn            |    45193 |
| dcm55343           |    45188 |
| chaddean           |    44314 |
| jeffm              |    42817 |
| panda80            |    42233 |
| wadsteckel         |    41384 |
| ua747sp            |    41200 |
| master_son         |    40915 |
| julmac             |    40457 |
| cl94               |    37368 |
| hoopitypoop        |    37201 |
| tikester           |    36098 |
| dfilpus            |    35514 |
| johninkingwood     |    35350 |
| intheam            |    34161 |
| ngrier             |    33431 |
| bobcobb            |    33124 |
| drebbin37          |    33049 |
| jimvette           |    32706 |
| sipes23            |    32464 |
| skatcher           |    32378 |
| htm_duke           |    32057 |
| klundgren          |    32000 |
| roadgeek_adam      |    31969 |
| norheim            |    30813 |
| rlee               |    29691 |
| angelsfreeek       |    29611 |
| cinx               |    29571 |
| deathtopumpkins    |    29381 |
| gman2337           |    29222 |
| highplainstrvlr    |    28904 |
| ChrisZwolle        |    28153 |
| ssgtcrusty         |    27452 |
| mikeandkristie     |    27109 |
| capn               |    26825 |
| dcharlie           |    26637 |
| kramer             |    26441 |
| codyg1985          |    26297 |
| new_friends_gr     |    26171 |
| sneezy             |    25486 |
| mirage45331        |    25463 |
| dave1693           |    24465 |
| quidditch33        |    23891 |
| eucitizen          |    23808 |
| bogdymol           |    23496 |
| jerseyman4         |    23402 |
| lowenbrau          |    23112 |
| sbeaver44          |    22892 |
| wphiii             |    22849 |
| osu_lsu            |    22535 |
| tckma              |    22370 |
| pahighways         |    22301 |
| regoarrarr         |    22107 |
| afarina            |    21978 |
| jstalica           |    21580 |
| niels              |    21087 |
| whopperman         |    20714 |
| mojavenc           |    20684 |
| hoss6884           |    20624 |
| cabiness42         |    20566 |
| 1995hoo            |    20450 |
| bickendan          |    20267 |
| squatchis          |    20163 |
| the_spui_ninja     |    19359 |
| synkdorbit         |    19024 |
| jackgaynor         |    18851 |
| philimon           |    18825 |
| dnthrox            |    18796 |
| Ugnaught2          |    18780 |
| scott_stieglitz    |    18728 |
| jweeks             |    18538 |
| w9tam              |    18352 |
| vdeane             |    18334 |
| keithcavey         |    18238 |
| imgoph             |    18048 |
| thehighwayman3561  |    17984 |
| nrm1221            |    17806 |
| crosboro7          |    17512 |
| jayhawkco          |    17441 |
| 25or6to4           |    17365 |
| griffith           |    17331 |
| tag42481           |    17298 |
| gpw                |    17003 |
| dantheman          |    16915 |
| snowedin           |    16911 |
| lamsalfl           |    16895 |
| spinoza            |    16604 |
| morriswa           |    16218 |
| hurricanehink      |    15985 |
| njroadhorse        |    15945 |
| thing342           |    15487 |
| kjslaughter        |    15443 |
| mc49399            |    15422 |
| presidentman       |    15272 |
| mvak36             |    15063 |
| DJCane             |    14968 |
| verruckte_dan      |    14937 |
| twinsfan87         |    14804 |
| mwasleski          |    14633 |
| Based8             |    14450 |
| yipcoyote          |    14310 |
| jwood              |    14293 |
| rebelgtp           |    14152 |
| paulthemapguy      |    14068 |
| JamesMD            |    13722 |
| 7_8                |    13456 |
| clong              |    13335 |
| inagaddadavida     |    13310 |
| clark1mt           |    13252 |
| yakra              |    13214 |
| opspe              |    12994 |
| thefxexpert        |    12851 |
| foresthills93      |    12803 |
| tbwillie           |    12668 |
| radison            |    12665 |
| navigator          |    12636 |
| cougar1989         |    12374 |
| osu97gp            |    12364 |
| markkos1992        |    12348 |
| extremebandman     |    12250 |
| jbum86MASTER       |    11733 |
| pianocello130      |    11591 |
| epzik8             |    11523 |
| eth                |    11453 |
| neilbert           |    10979 |
| rschen7754         |    10796 |
| iowahighways       |    10784 |
| baugh17            |    10781 |
| Beerman            |    10107 |
| Chikara            |    10057 |
| eidderf            |     9856 |
| si404              |     9558 |
| ibexto             |     9533 |
| roadguy2           |     9455 |
| lakewy17           |     9032 |
| tomhart            |     8973 |
| slorydn1           |     8808 |
| route56            |     8756 |
| jpinyan            |     8410 |
| mariethefoxy       |     8381 |
| drfrankenstein     |     8259 |
| roukan             |     8162 |
| along              |     8128 |
| dough4872          |     8069 |
| bulldog1979        |     7573 |
| intelati49         |     7159 |
| snowmatt8          |     6930 |
| myselfalso         |     6878 |
| dgolub             |     6850 |
| moshitea           |     6811 |
| cyhighways         |     6802 |
| atsiatas           |     6642 |
| paddy              |     6522 |
| Aseluit            |     6345 |
| bubaclex           |     6201 |
| electronym         |     6117 |
| ran4sh             |     6082 |
| happy5214          |     5801 |
| dsaneus            |     5643 |
| rickmastfan67      |     5545 |
| dsm4cy             |     5445 |
| tarheel61581       |     5441 |
| dscarroll          |     5323 |
| neroute2           |     5117 |
| voyager105         |     5043 |
| ohroadscholar      |     4866 |
| compdude787        |     4860 |
| tjj25              |     4366 |
| verumsolum         |     4301 |
| gimmicks           |     4240 |
| dylucktrocket      |     4199 |
| jjbers             |     4162 |
| mr_matt_k          |     4152 |
| roadgeek99         |     4090 |
| georgiaroadgeek    |     3605 |
| bm7                |     3583 |
| skoutr1            |     3303 |
| peperodriguez2710  |     3267 |
| sammi              |     2897 |
| xcvxcvxcv          |     2810 |
| es92               |     2605 |
| riiga              |     2539 |
| sfisher            |     2503 |
| sounderbruce       |     2386 |
| harvey             |     2222 |
| dctransit          |     2142 |
| boris              |     2091 |
| rgentry            |     2047 |
| xorodejon          |     1898 |
| vinoman64          |     1878 |
| 1                  |     1712 |
| vcap36             |     1712 |
| golubcar           |     1639 |
| kurzov             |     1395 |
| scheidler          |     1210 |
| sercamaro          |     1197 |
| finnedude          |     1190 |
| mepaulrye          |     1109 |
| robringstad        |     1070 |
| riehlj             |      912 |
| polabare           |      902 |
| philman            |      811 |
| dognm16            |      804 |
| noelbotevera       |      779 |
| ThelwallViaduct    |      605 |
| jordancarrpeterson |      566 |
| superblu2007       |      489 |
| usaidhello         |      152 |
+--------------------+----------+
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on December 14, 2018, 08:39:14 am
Here's another.

Code: [Select]
select segmentid, count(*) as travelcount from clinched group by segmentid order by travelcount;
This gives all segments ordered by number of travelers.  It's 440,000+ lines long, but we can see that 13 segments are traveled by 129 travelers each, which is the most of any.  I'd have to expand the query to join with the segments and probably routes tables to get meaningful information about those segments like the end waypoints and the name of the route.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on December 14, 2018, 09:39:49 am
^ Is there a fairly easy way to determine how many route segments have been traveled by only one user, aggregated by region and/or system, compared to the total number of segments?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on December 14, 2018, 10:07:35 am
Quote from: froggie on December 14, 2018, 09:39:49 am
^ Is there a fairly easy way to determine how many route segments have been traveled by only one user, aggregated by region and/or system, compared to the total number of segments?

That's among the things I'd like to add.  Somewhere in the forum or in a GitHub issue, this was referred to by someone as a "TM Pioneer" - the only traveler to clinch a segment/route/connected route.  I think I just need to take a day to experiment with some interesting SQL queries and get them into appropriate existing or new places in the web front end.  I envision maps where segments are colored by number of travelers, possibly with some special highlighting of segments traveled by a single user.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: oscar on December 14, 2018, 11:31:02 am
Quote from: Jim on December 14, 2018, 10:07:35 am
I envision maps where segments are colored by number of travelers, possibly with some special highlighting of segments traveled by a single user.

Based on my own travels, you'll have quite a few route segments traveled by a single user, especially in preview systems like cansk. Might not be "special" enough to warrant highlighting.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 14, 2018, 01:21:13 pm
Quote from: froggie on December 14, 2018, 09:39:49 am
^ Is there a fairly easy way to determine how many route segments have been traveled by only one user, aggregated by region and/or system, compared to the total number of segments?
aggregated by system:
http://yakra.teresco.org/tmtools_demos/pioneers/outdated_UserData/pioneers.log
Edit: Ignore this for now. List Names are showing up incorrectly. E.G., tikester's trailblazing segments of either CA US101BusPas or CA US101HisPas are showing up as CA US101 proper. :(
Fixed.

Edit: I should note that this is also only for segments explicitly .listed by a traveler, without any augments for concurrencies.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on December 14, 2018, 02:14:49 pm
^ Something's not working with your script and/or output, Eric.  I recognized several segments in Alabama that the logs recognize I've been on, but someone else is shown on your list as the sole clincher.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 15, 2018, 12:30:21 am
Interesting. What are some examples? I'll definitely need to look into this.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 15, 2018, 02:36:39 am
The code I used to produce the original log was an in-progress C++ version of siteupdate.
I added similar code to siteupdate.py to make the same log.
the log (http://yakra.teresco.org/tmtools_demos/pioneers/outdated_UserData/pioneers_python.log)
the diff (http://yakra.teresco.org/tmtools_demos/pioneers/outdated_UserData/pioneers.python-to-cpp.diff)
I don't see the problem you described as you describe it, but I do see a very similar problem:
I recognized several segments in New Brunswick that the logs recognize Oscar has been on, but I am shown on my list as the sole clincher.

In the DIFF, I don't see anything in Alabama. I see two three possibilities:
1. Your segments are ones that you didn't explicitly .list, but acquired via a concurrency with another route.
2. A similar problem exists in the original siteupdate.py.
3. I goofed and didn't run my program with up-to-date UserData.

Whatever's going on here, thank you for the bug report. Some detective work is in order.
Maybe even a thread split...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on December 15, 2018, 07:59:59 am
Yes, the problem I saw is similar in nature to what you saw with NB and Oscar.  Regarding your possibilities, it's not #1..I did explicitly list the routes in my list (the first example I noticed being AL 10 near the Mississippi line).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 15, 2018, 12:45:30 pm
Quote from: froggie on December 15, 2018, 07:59:59 am
Yes, the problem I saw is similar in nature to what you saw with NB and Oscar.  Regarding your possibilities, it's not #1..I did explicitly list the routes in my list (the first example I noticed being AL 10 near the Mississippi line).
Indeed. I see in froggie.list (https://github.com/TravelMapping/UserData/blob/35e1850c3f6e226d6a831fb1f9941b800f3430f6/list_files/froggie.list#L97):
AL AL10 MS/AL US43
...and mapcat is listed as the pioneer on AL AL10 ComSt LinAve for example, even in the Python version (http://yakra.teresco.org/tmtools_demos/pioneers_python.log).
This suggests to me that there's something fishy in the original siteupdate.py. The code I added was short & simple & straightforward, and I don't see any room for something to have gone wrong with this small addition...
Code: [Select]
# after processing traveler list files

segment_count = 0
print(et.et() + "writing pioneers.log",end="",flush=True)
pioneerslog = open('pioneers.log','w')
for h in highway_systems:
    for r in h.route_list:
        for seg in r.segment_list:
            segment_count += 1
    if len(seg.clinched_by) == 1:
                pioneerslog.write(str(seg) + " " + seg.clinched_by[0].traveler_name + "\n")
    print(".",end="",flush=True)
print("")
pioneerslog.write(str(segment_count) + " total segments.\n")
pioneerslog.close()

sys.exit()

# before reading updates.csv
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 15, 2018, 01:47:58 pm
D'OH!
Somehow I skipped getting my UserData repo up-to-date.
I pulled in the latest changes from GitHub, and saw 115 additions to froggie.list.
This should cure the Alabama problems (I'm going to test again), but I think some other bugs will still remain.

Edit: OK, try this:
New Python log (http://yakra.teresco.org/tmtools_demos/pioneers/20181215/pioneers_python.log) (consider this the definitive one)
New C++ log (http://yakra.teresco.org/tmtools_demos/pioneers/20181215/pioneers_cpp.log) (this one's buggy)
Their diff (http://yakra.teresco.org/tmtools_demos/pioneers/20181215/pioneers.python-to-cpp.diff) (I still have stuff to work on...)

Our westernmost pioneer on AL10 is now froggie, starting at AL69.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 21, 2018, 02:04:51 pm
Quote from: Jim on December 13, 2018, 02:56:00 pm
Here are the current numbers of lines per .list file.  Note that some will be invalid lines, comments, or blank lines, so consider them a bit on the high side in many cases.  The average number of lines per file is 1235.8.

Code: [Select]
    1027 bickendan.list
     955 yakra.list
      66 whopperman.list
Hm. Out of curiosity, how did you compile this list?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on December 21, 2018, 04:23:55 pm
Quote from: yakra on December 21, 2018, 02:04:51 pm
Quote from: Jim on December 13, 2018, 02:56:00 pm
Here are the current numbers of lines per .list file.  Note that some will be invalid lines, comments, or blank lines, so consider them a bit on the high side in many cases.  The average number of lines per file is 1235.8.

Code: [Select]
    1027 bickendan.list
     955 yakra.list
      66 whopperman.list
Hm. Out of curiosity, how did you compile this list?
  • yakra.list (https://github.com/TravelMapping/UserData/blob/1dbe5ed41250d3ae46a42cd4babfdda4576449df/list_files/yakra.list) is correct, at 955 lines.
  • bickendan.list (https://github.com/TravelMapping/UserData/blob/3101895c4f121a7598ce4f068a47cc4b297c5078/list_files/bickendan.list) has 1028 lines, with no newline @ EOF.
  • whopperman.list (https://github.com/TravelMapping/UserData/blob/6309036c44102eb3325d49515b32c5eef3b3cb1e/list_files/whopperman.list) is a unique, interesting case. Note how GitHub doesn't display new line numbers for most new lines. Most of the newlines use only the 0x0D character, as opposed to the Unix 0x0A or DOS/Windows 0x0D0A. I have to wonder if whopperman initially drafted this file on classic Mac OS (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newline#Representation). I'm counting 828 lines (791 good lines (http://travelmapping.net/logs/users/whopperman.log)). GitHub shows 67. With the absence of a newline @ EOF, we're down to 66 as shown above.
In the list_files directory,

Code: [Select]
wc -l * | sort -nr
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 22, 2018, 01:26:11 am
wc --help
sort --help
Boom! Got it. :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on December 22, 2018, 07:53:43 am
Quote from: yakra on December 22, 2018, 01:26:11 am
wc --help
sort --help
Boom! Got it. :)

If course you meant

man wc
man sort
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 22, 2018, 12:32:05 pm
Never really been a fan of man pages, for some reason. I'll just take the "digest version" of a --help, most of the time.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 04, 2019, 01:48:30 am
What's the largest WPT file, by filesize?
If that's not convenient to answer, which WPT file has the most waypoints?
tx.us087.wpt, at 26026 bytes, has 282 points.
Looking to see if there's anything larger, unless anyone else comes up with an answer first.

Edit:
largest WPT by filesize is /home/yakra/TravelMapping/HighwayData/hwy_data/RUS/asiah/rus.ah006irk.wpt, at 58882 bytes.
largest WPT by point count is /home/yakra/TravelMapping/HighwayData/hwy_data/RUS/asiah/rus.ah006irk.wpt, at 886 points.

The largest .list file, meanwhile, was much easier to find, with all the .lists in the same directory.
It's vespertine.list, at 195814 bytes and 849 lines.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: oscar on January 04, 2019, 07:32:45 am
Quote from: yakra on January 04, 2019, 01:48:30 am
The largest .list file, meanwhile, was much easier to find, with all the .lists in the same directory.
It's vespertine.list, at 195814 bytes and 849 lines.

vespertine.list's log file shows 8434 good lines, plus a few "bad lines", mainly for Mississippi state routes for which there isn't a preview or active system. Two other list files are over 7000 good lines.

As for wpt files, BC 97 and CA 1 were once competitive for "largest file", and may still be in North America. But both were recently streamlined, and neither comes close to rus.ah006irk.wpt.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 04, 2019, 01:30:12 pm
Oops. I meant 8499 lines IIRC. Total line count including blanks and comments.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on January 06, 2019, 02:40:44 am
More than 1.2 million miles (1,200,964 mi) in preview + active systems now.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on January 12, 2019, 02:20:17 pm
The Highway Data Repository has just had its 2500th pull request.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on January 12, 2019, 08:19:06 pm
Quote from: si404 on January 12, 2019, 02:20:17 pm
The Highway Data Repository has just had its 2500th pull request.

Pull requests + Issues.  We've had 2348 pull requests and 153 issues now.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 14, 2019, 01:25:52 pm
The HighwayData repository has just had pull request #2500. ;)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on January 14, 2019, 01:31:11 pm
No, it's still 2371.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 14, 2019, 10:58:35 pm
We're at 2373rd pull requst, which is number 2526, nominally.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 15, 2019, 12:54:12 am
Quote from: michih on January 06, 2019, 02:40:44 am
More than 1.2 million miles (1,200,964 mi) in preview + active systems now.
Right now:
active only = 884948.64 mi
active+preview = 1221787.36 mi
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on January 15, 2019, 04:09:37 am
Quote from: yakra on January 15, 2019, 12:54:12 am
Right now:
active only = 884948.64 mi
active+preview = 1221787.36 mi
Well that's what comes of my making two systems active and 18 preview this year - bigger numbers...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Bickendan on January 26, 2019, 05:23:48 pm
Quote from: yakra on January 04, 2019, 01:48:30 am
What's the largest WPT file, by filesize?
If that's not convenient to answer, which WPT file has the most waypoints?
tx.us087.wpt, at 26026 bytes, has 282 points.
Looking to see if there's anything larger, unless anyone else comes up with an answer first.

Edit:
largest WPT by filesize is /home/yakra/TravelMapping/HighwayData/hwy_data/RUS/asiah/rus.ah006irk.wpt, at 58882 bytes.
largest WPT by point count is /home/yakra/TravelMapping/HighwayData/hwy_data/RUS/asiah/rus.ah006irk.wpt, at 886 points.

The largest .list file, meanwhile, was much easier to find, with all the .lists in the same directory.
It's vespertine.list, at 195814 bytes and 849 lines.
AUSWA N1 clocks in at 827 points, but has a length of 3300 miles
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on February 20, 2019, 09:44:17 pm
The easternmost vertex within 100 miles of Siena College falls on the MA/NH line.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on February 21, 2019, 11:45:05 am
^ It's not like Vermont and New Hampshire have a lot of east-west width...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on February 21, 2019, 02:16:08 pm
Yup.  I just thought it was neat that it was a state line point.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on March 10, 2019, 04:17:34 pm
With today's new preview systems (turd+ausm) we do no longer have any traveler with more than 20% of preview+active systems mileage clinched.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on March 31, 2019, 09:41:35 pm
Some time recently we first passed the 50,000 mark for the number of .wpt files being ingested across active, preview, and devel systems.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on April 16, 2019, 12:00:02 pm
More than 900,000mi in active systems now :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 20, 2019, 10:34:53 pm
With the implementation of traveled format graphs (thanks again @yakra!), and in response to an email I received from a user, I put together a small program that reports the least- and most-traveled segments in a graph.  Running on the full tm-master-traveled.tmg graph, which has 481,044 edges, there are 190,498 not traveled by anyone.

Before I report the most-traveled edges, I'll give a chance for guesses.  There are 2 of them tied, traveled by 138 of our 241 users, and they're consecutive edges along a single route.  What do you think? 

Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on May 20, 2019, 11:18:52 pm
VA I-95 near the Springfield Interchange. A bit south of it. Or wait, now I'm second-guessing myself. Was it closer to Richmond?
IIRC this was mentioned upthread -- only one of the segments, noting that it was tied but not specifying what with.

OK, I just cheated and looked at VA-region-traveled.tmg, and the two segments immediately south of the beltway have 137 travelers. Which ones have 138? Dunno. Anyone else?

Edit: I made a temporary mod to siteupdate.cpp, and found the segments. It was easier than writing something new to parse graphs. :) They are not where I expected.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on May 21, 2019, 05:04:58 am
Quote from: Jim on May 20, 2019, 10:34:53 pm
There are 2 of them tied, traveled by 138 of our 241 users, and they're consecutive edges along a single route.  What do you think?
That there's a shaping point shared between those two edges?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 21, 2019, 07:10:31 am
Quote from: si404 on May 21, 2019, 05:04:58 am
Quote from: Jim on May 20, 2019, 10:34:53 pm
There are 2 of them tied, traveled by 138 of our 241 users, and they're consecutive edges along a single route.  What do you think?
That there's a shaping point shared between those two edges?

No, 3 consecutive exits off a limited-access highway.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Eth on May 21, 2019, 12:10:50 pm
I decided to look through my own travels, figuring I was likely one of the travelers, and I think I've found it:

DE I-95 4A 4B
DE I-95 4B 5A

Those segments show as being driven by 92.62% of DE I-95's total 149 drivers, and if my math is correct that would work out to 138.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 21, 2019, 12:17:38 pm
Quote from: Eth on May 21, 2019, 12:10:50 pm
I decided to look through my own travels, figuring I was likely one of the travelers, and I think I've found it:

DE I-95 4A 4B
DE I-95 4B 5A

Those segments show as being driven by 92.62% of DE I-95's total 149 drivers, and if my math is correct that would work out to 138.

These are the winners.  Lots of people on the Delaware Turnpike.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 21, 2019, 12:26:24 pm
Next TM traveler trivia question: of all of the graphs generated for the METAL project (http://travelmapping.net/graphs/) which one has the most-traveled least-traveled segment?  That is, look at each graph and find its least-traveled segment.  Then find the largest such value.  Guesses?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on May 21, 2019, 06:21:24 pm
TM-Master!  :P

I'm guessing you don't want to include the everything one. Asia has an awful lot of untravelled (and so least-travelled) segments, but I'm not sure that's the winner.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 21, 2019, 08:23:49 pm
Quote from: si404 on May 21, 2019, 06:21:24 pm
TM-Master!  :P

I'm guessing you don't want to include the everything one. Asia has an awful lot of untravelled (and so least-travelled) segments, but I'm not sure that's the winner.

The master graph definitely has some 0-traveler segments, so it's part of the 334-way tie for last place in this ranking.

In the other 52 graphs, every segment is clinched by at least one traveler.  The question is, for which graph is that minimum number of clinchers on any segment maximized.

The "area" graphs tend to be clustered near the top of this list because they're most likely to be in places people go like big cities.  However, the winner, and it's the winner by a significant margin, is a region graph.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on May 21, 2019, 10:44:58 pm
Quote from: Jim on May 21, 2019, 08:23:49 pm
The master graph definitely has some 0-traveler segments, so it's part of the 334-way tie for last place in this ranking.

In the other 52 graphs, every segment is clinched by at least one traveler.
Don't you mean, the other 65 graphs?

Quote from: Jim on May 21, 2019, 08:23:49 pm
The question is, for which graph is that minimum number of clinchers on any segment maximized.

The "area" graphs tend to be clustered near the top of this list because they're most likely to be in places people go like big cities.  However, the winner, and it's the winner by a significant margin, is a region graph.
Spoiler! (http://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=3030.msg13952#msg13952) :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on May 22, 2019, 03:46:53 am
Quote from: Jim on May 21, 2019, 08:23:49 pm
The master graph definitely has some 0-traveler segments, so it's part of the 334-way tie for last place in this ranking.
Misread it as most least-travelled sections (I think Europe wins that as it has so many edges, and fewer travellers than North America), rather than the highest value for least-travelled section  :-[

Got the answer you are looking for as soon as I realised what it was you were asking for. A small graph in an urban area without many routes to deal with.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 22, 2019, 06:57:15 am
Quote from: yakra on May 21, 2019, 10:44:58 pm
Quote from: Jim on May 21, 2019, 08:23:49 pm
The master graph definitely has some 0-traveler segments, so it's part of the 334-way tie for last place in this ranking.

In the other 52 graphs, every segment is clinched by at least one traveler.
Don't you mean, the other 65 graphs?

I deleted a bunch that were invalid.  For some reason, the France "IGNORE TEST" systems confuse graph generation.

Related to that, if I can get a test DB to be more usable, can those test systems be moved out of the production DB?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on May 22, 2019, 10:20:45 am
Quote from: Jim on May 22, 2019, 06:57:15 am
I deleted a bunch that were invalid.  For some reason, the France "IGNORE TEST" systems confuse graph generation.
They break the assumption that an edge lives within a single region.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/DataProcessing/issues/205
The region of an edge is that assigned to its canonical segment, which is that passed to the HGEdge constructor, which is the first segment on a concurrency list for concurrent segments.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 22, 2019, 01:36:41 pm
For our graphs with at least one traveled segment, here's what we have.  Possibly the most surprising to me is that, given the size of the MD state highway system, that every segment in the state has been traveled by at least 4 TM users.

GraphLeast-traveled edgeMost-traveled edge
DC-region-traveled.tmg13123
naples25-area-traveled.tmg970
siena25-area-traveled.tmg798
chicago25-area-traveled.tmg6126
nyc20-area-traveled.tmg5128
mhc25-area-traveled.tmg582
dc20-area-traveled.tmg4137
MD-region-traveled.tmg4135
baltimore25-area-traveled.tmg4135
siena50-area-traveled.tmg498
MAF-region-traveled.tmg45
NJ-region-traveled.tmg3132
NY-region-traveled.tmg3110
ubuffalo50-area-traveled.tmg3106
kc20-area-traveled.tmg3102
MS-region-traveled.tmg382
DE-region-traveled.tmg2138
usai-system-traveled.tmg2138
OH-region-traveled.tmg2118
IN-region-traveled.tmg2114
CT-region-traveled.tmg2112
WI-region-traveled.tmg2103
RI-region-traveled.tmg2102
siena100-area-traveled.tmg2101
MA-region-traveled.tmg2100
NH-region-traveled.tmg298
boston20-area-traveled.tmg297
IA-region-traveled.tmg296
sfbay50-area-traveled.tmg289
MI-region-traveled.tmg288
MEX-QROO-region-traveled.tmg25
MEX-YUC-region-traveled.tmg25
MEX-BCS-region-traveled.tmg22
VA-region-traveled.tmg1137
IL-region-traveled.tmg1126
stlouis25-area-traveled.tmg1122
muhlenberg25-area-traveled.tmg1100
seattle25-area-traveled.tmg196
HI-region-traveled.tmg136
cantch-system-traveled.tmg135
innsbruck25-area-traveled.tmg120
LIE-region-traveled.tmg19
DEU-BE-region-traveled.tmg18
MLT-region-traveled.tmg17
MEX-BC-region-traveled.tmg16
ABW-region-traveled.tmg14
ESP-IB-region-traveled.tmg13
NT-region-traveled.tmg13
MEX-JAL-region-traveled.tmg12
MEX-CAM-region-traveled.tmg11
MEX-COL-region-traveled.tmg11
MEX-TAB-region-traveled.tmg11
NA-continent-traveled.tmg0138
USA-country-traveled.tmg0138
USA-national-traveled.tmg0138
tm-master-traveled.tmg0138
usaus-system-traveled.tmg0136
GA-region-traveled.tmg0127
TN-region-traveled.tmg0123
PA-region-traveled.tmg0122
FL-region-traveled.tmg0120
SC-region-traveled.tmg0112
USA-newengland-traveled.tmg0112
MO-region-traveled.tmg0111
NC-region-traveled.tmg0110
KY-region-traveled.tmg0108
WV-region-traveled.tmg0107
CO-region-traveled.tmg0103
AR-region-traveled.tmg099
ME-region-traveled.tmg097
WA-region-traveled.tmg096
omaha30-area-traveled.tmg096
NE-region-traveled.tmg092
grandisland50-area-traveled.tmg092
NV-region-traveled.tmg091
SD-region-traveled.tmg091
CA-region-traveled.tmg089
LA-region-traveled.tmg089
MN-region-traveled.tmg088
AL-region-traveled.tmg086
CAN-country-traveled.tmg086
ON-region-traveled.tmg086
UT-region-traveled.tmg085
KS-region-traveled.tmg084
la125-area-traveled.tmg081
OK-region-traveled.tmg080
AZ-region-traveled.tmg077
WY-region-traveled.tmg076
TX-region-traveled.tmg075
VT-region-traveled.tmg075
OR-region-traveled.tmg073
ND-region-traveled.tmg072
NM-region-traveled.tmg071
albuquerque50-area-traveled.tmg071
MT-region-traveled.tmg067
austin25-area-traveled.tmg066
ID-region-traveled.tmg064
QC-region-traveled.tmg047
montreal25-area-traveled.tmg047
OCE-continent-traveled.tmg036
BC-region-traveled.tmg033
wolfcreek50-area-traveled.tmg025
ENG-region-traveled.tmg023
EUR-continent-traveled.tmg023
EUR-freeways-traveled.tmg023
GBR-country-traveled.tmg023
british-isles-traveled.tmg023
london25-area-traveled.tmg023
AB-region-traveled.tmg021
AK-region-traveled.tmg021
CAN-maritimes-traveled.tmg021
NB-region-traveled.tmg021
eure-system-traveled.tmg021
AUT-region-traveled.tmg020
DEU-BY-region-traveled.tmg019
DEU-country-traveled.tmg019
FRA-country-traveled.tmg019
FRA-region-traveled.tmg019
BEL-region-traveled.tmg018
CHE-region-traveled.tmg018
DEU-HE-region-traveled.tmg018
DEU-BW-region-traveled.tmg017
DEU-RP-region-traveled.tmg017
ITA-region-traveled.tmg017
NS-region-traveled.tmg017
PE-region-traveled.tmg017
LUX-region-traveled.tmg016
DEU-NW-region-traveled.tmg015
PR-region-traveled.tmg015
west-indies-traveled.tmg015
NLD-country-traveled.tmg014
NLD-region-traveled.tmg014
CZE-region-traveled.tmg013
MB-region-traveled.tmg012
SVN-region-traveled.tmg012
DEU-SL-region-traveled.tmg011
DNK-country-traveled.tmg011
DNK-region-traveled.tmg011
ISL-region-traveled.tmg011
SVK-region-traveled.tmg011
copenhagen25-area-traveled.tmg011
DEU-NI-region-traveled.tmg010
DEU-SN-region-traveled.tmg010
DEU-ST-region-traveled.tmg010
ESP-AN-region-traveled.tmg010
ESP-country-traveled.tmg010
HRV-region-traveled.tmg010
HUN-region-traveled.tmg010
IRL-region-traveled.tmg010
SK-region-traveled.tmg010
WLS-region-traveled.tmg010
DEU-TH-region-traveled.tmg09
POL-region-traveled.tmg09
PRT-region-traveled.tmg09
SCT-region-traveled.tmg09
SWE-region-traveled.tmg09
DEU-BB-region-traveled.tmg08
DEU-HH-region-traveled.tmg08
ESP-CT-region-traveled.tmg08
NIR-region-traveled.tmg08
NOR-region-traveled.tmg08
DEU-HB-region-traveled.tmg07
ESP-AR-region-traveled.tmg07
NL-region-traveled.tmg07
YT-region-traveled.tmg07
AND-region-traveled.tmg06
DEU-MV-region-traveled.tmg06
DEU-SH-region-traveled.tmg06
ESP-MD-region-traveled.tmg06
ESP-PV-region-traveled.tmg06
ESP-VC-region-traveled.tmg06
MEX-country-traveled.tmg06
MNE-region-traveled.tmg06
SRB-region-traveled.tmg06
VI-region-traveled.tmg06
BIH-region-traveled.tmg05
ESP-CL-region-traveled.tmg05
ESP-CM-region-traveled.tmg05
ESP-EX-region-traveled.tmg05
FIN-country-traveled.tmg05
FIN-region-traveled.tmg05
LTU-region-traveled.tmg05
LVA-region-traveled.tmg05
ASI-continent-traveled.tmg04
BGR-region-traveled.tmg04
BLZ-region-traveled.tmg04
ESP-CB-region-traveled.tmg04
ESP-MC-region-traveled.tmg04
ESP-NC-region-traveled.tmg04
EST-region-traveled.tmg04
GRC-region-traveled.tmg04
ISR-region-traveled.tmg04
MKD-region-traveled.tmg04
ROU-region-traveled.tmg04
AFR-continent-traveled.tmg03
AUS-NSW-region-traveled.tmg03
AUS-QLD-region-traveled.tmg03
AUS-country-traveled.tmg03
BRB-region-traveled.tmg03
ESP-AS-region-traveled.tmg03
ESP-GA-region-traveled.tmg03
ESP-RI-region-traveled.tmg03
GU-region-traveled.tmg03
MAR-region-traveled.tmg03
PHL-region-traveled.tmg03
PSE-region-traveled.tmg03
ALB-region-traveled.tmg02
AUS-NT-region-traveled.tmg02
CHN-BJ-region-traveled.tmg02
CHN-country-traveled.tmg02
ESP-CN-region-traveled.tmg02
FRO-region-traveled.tmg02
GLP-region-traveled.tmg02
HKG-region-traveled.tmg02
KOR-region-traveled.tmg02
MEX-EMEX-region-traveled.tmg02
MEX-GTO-region-traveled.tmg02
MEX-NAY-region-traveled.tmg02
NZL-region-traveled.tmg02
RKS-region-traveled.tmg02
RUS-region-traveled.tmg02
SGP-region-traveled.tmg02
SPM-region-traveled.tmg02
THA-region-traveled.tmg02
TUR-region-traveled.tmg02
TWN-region-traveled.tmg02
ARE-region-traveled.tmg01
AS-region-traveled.tmg01
AUS-ACT-region-traveled.tmg01
AUS-SA-region-traveled.tmg01
AUS-VIC-region-traveled.tmg01
AUS-WA-region-traveled.tmg01
AZE-region-traveled.tmg01
BGD-region-traveled.tmg01
BHR-region-traveled.tmg01
BLR-region-traveled.tmg01
BWA-region-traveled.tmg01
CHN-GD-region-traveled.tmg01
CHN-HA-region-traveled.tmg01
CHN-HE-region-traveled.tmg01
CHN-SH-region-traveled.tmg01
CHN-YN-region-traveled.tmg01
CYM-region-traveled.tmg01
CYP-region-traveled.tmg01
EGY-region-traveled.tmg01
GEO-region-traveled.tmg01
IDN-region-traveled.tmg01
IMN-region-traveled.tmg01
IND-MH-region-traveled.tmg01
IND-country-traveled.tmg01
JAM-region-traveled.tmg01
JEY-region-traveled.tmg01
JOR-region-traveled.tmg01
JPN-region-traveled.tmg01
KAZ-region-traveled.tmg01
KGZ-region-traveled.tmg01
KHM-region-traveled.tmg01
MDA-region-traveled.tmg01
MEX-CHIH-region-traveled.tmg01
MEX-DF-region-traveled.tmg01
MEX-HGO-region-traveled.tmg01
MEX-MICH-region-traveled.tmg01
MEX-PUE-region-traveled.tmg01
MEX-QRO-region-traveled.tmg01
MEX-SON-region-traveled.tmg01
MEX-TLAX-region-traveled.tmg01
MEX-VER-region-traveled.tmg01
MTQ-region-traveled.tmg01
MYS-region-traveled.tmg01
NAM-region-traveled.tmg01
NPL-region-traveled.tmg01
PYF-region-traveled.tmg01
QAT-region-traveled.tmg01
TTO-region-traveled.tmg01
UKR-country-traveled.tmg01
UKR-region-traveled.tmg01
UZB-region-traveled.tmg01
VNM-region-traveled.tmg01
ZAF-region-traveled.tmg01
ZMB-region-traveled.tmg01
ZWE-region-traveled.tmg01
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on May 22, 2019, 02:17:40 pm
Quote from: Jim on May 22, 2019, 06:57:15 am
Related to that, if I can get a test DB to be more usable, can those test systems be moved out of the production DB?
No! There's no point hiding them when it's easier to make them go live, which I hope to do by the end of the month.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on May 22, 2019, 02:20:24 pm
Quote from: si404 on May 22, 2019, 02:17:40 pm
Quote from: Jim on May 22, 2019, 06:57:15 am
Related to that, if I can get a test DB to be more usable, can those test systems be moved out of the production DB?
No! There's no point hiding them when it's easier to make them go live, which I hope to do by the end of the month.

Sounds like a good plan to me, thanks.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on May 22, 2019, 02:44:13 pm
Quote from: si404 on May 22, 2019, 02:17:40 pm
Quote from: Jim on May 22, 2019, 06:57:15 am
Related to that, if I can get a test DB to be more usable, can those test systems be moved out of the production DB?
No! There's no point hiding them when it's easier to make them go live, which I hope to do by the end of the month.

? tmtest can be used with exactly the same data as the production db but we can "play" with it as desired, e.g. adding future regions to check that data is fine.

However, thanks for working on going live with "splitting France" :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on August 27, 2019, 01:30:48 pm
We have 100 preview systems now (235 active and 12 devel systems).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on August 27, 2019, 01:50:28 pm
Quote from: michih on August 27, 2019, 01:30:48 pm
We have 100 preview systems now (235 active and 12 devel systems).

I'd be very happy if we could convince everyone to focus on peer review of preview systems to get them activated rather than developing more new systems.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on August 28, 2019, 11:09:48 am
Quote from: Jim on August 27, 2019, 01:50:28 pm
I'd be very happy if we could convince everyone to focus on peer review of preview systems to get them activated rather than developing more new systems.
That's my aim at least (yes, I know I just made a handful of systems preview, but that's part of the activation process) :P
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on September 06, 2019, 01:58:18 pm
We have 250 users now.
With the next site update, we'll also have 250 active systems :)

Upcoming milestones: 50,000 preview+active routes and 1,000,000 miles in active systems.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: mapcat on September 06, 2019, 08:21:09 pm
250* users  ;)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on September 07, 2019, 03:47:28 am
Quote from: michih on September 06, 2019, 01:58:18 pm
we'll also have 250 active systems
251!

We're 72,058 miles away from 1,000,000 on active systems, with 4,385 coming in next pull. So 67,673 miles to go. Which is probably about 10 system activations time (depending, of course, on which systems, but I'm making educated guesses).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on September 07, 2019, 04:52:03 am
Quote from: mapcat on September 06, 2019, 08:21:09 pm
250* users  ;)

List files, not travelers ;)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on September 07, 2019, 10:43:38 am
Quote from: si404 on September 07, 2019, 03:47:28 am
Quote from: michih on September 06, 2019, 01:58:18 pm
we'll also have 250 active systems
251!

Yes, but no! I just wrote that we reach a milestone. I knew that it would be 251 but: http://travelmapping.net

The number of active systems was 245 yesterday. The number of preview systems was 91 yesterday.
You've activated six systems.
The number of active systems is 250 today. The number of preview systems is 86 today.
Sorry, I don't get it what went wrong...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on September 12, 2019, 01:38:15 pm
We have one single segment that carries 9 concurrent routes:

IN I-465 46 47
IN I-69FutInd 47(465) 46(465)
IN IN37 I-465(47) I-465(46)
IN IN67 I-465(47) I-465(46)
IN US31 47(465) 46(465)
IN US36 I-465(47) I-465(46)
IN US40 I-465(47) I-465(46)
IN US52 I-465(46) I-465(47)
IN US421 I-465(47) I-465(46)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: osu-lsu on September 12, 2019, 10:38:08 pm
Quote from: yakra on September 12, 2019, 01:38:15 pm
We have one single segment that carries 9 concurrent routes:

IN I-465 46 47
IN I-69FutInd 47(465) 46(465)
IN IN37 I-465(47) I-465(46)
IN IN67 I-465(47) I-465(46)
IN US31 47(465) 46(465)
IN US36 I-465(47) I-465(46)
IN US40 I-465(47) I-465(46)
IN US52 I-465(46) I-465(47)
IN US421 I-465(47) I-465(46)

Of course it would be I-465 around Indy.  ::)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: CharlotteAllisonCDTG on September 13, 2019, 12:56:32 pm
Are there any other seven-highway concurrencies?  I know of one in Georgia (if you count one unsigned highway).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: rickmastfan67 on September 18, 2019, 12:58:10 am
Quote from: CharlotteAllisonCDTG on September 13, 2019, 12:56:32 pm
Are there any other seven-highway concurrencies?  I know of one in Georgia (if you count one unsigned highway).

This one in GA?  https://goo.gl/maps/H9tjfrsJxzfXqMmJ8

All 7 are signed. (US-1, US-23, US-301, GA-4, GA-15, GA-23, GA-121)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: US 89 on October 06, 2019, 01:19:50 am
Quote from: rickmastfan67 on September 18, 2019, 12:58:10 am
Quote from: CharlotteAllisonCDTG on September 13, 2019, 12:56:32 pm
Are there any other seven-highway concurrencies?  I know of one in Georgia (if you count one unsigned highway).

This one in GA?  https://goo.gl/maps/H9tjfrsJxzfXqMmJ8

All 7 are signed. (US-1, US-23, US-301, GA-4, GA-15, GA-23, GA-121)

There's a concurrency in Athens between GA 10 Loop, US 29, US 78, US 129, US 441, GA 8, GA 15, and the unsigned GA 422, which makes eight highways.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: CharlotteAllisonCDTG on October 06, 2019, 10:20:11 am
This was the concurrency I was thinking of.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on December 04, 2019, 11:09:50 am
We have three travelers with 200,000 and more miles now! :)

The next traveler is close to it.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 19, 2019, 09:13:50 pm
The most common waypoint label is, unsurprisingly, +X01, with 8771 occurrences.
In 11th place, with 1827 occurrences, is the most common visible point label, End.
Our next visible labels are exits 1 thru 5, at 22nd thru 26th place, with 1004-1141 occurrences.
Three more shaping point labels, and then there are 960 MainSts, landing it 30th place.
The next visible one that's not an exit number is A1, numbering 721.
From there, it's a mix of shaping points & exit numbers along with A2, A4, A6 & A3, until US1 in 81st place with 378 cases.
Arguably the first not-completely-obvious one: there are 344 StaRds, landing it 87th place.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on February 14, 2020, 12:58:34 pm
The race is open - only 2,136 miles to go :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on March 29, 2020, 10:34:44 pm
And there we are, with usaga now active, we're at 1,009,568 miles in active systems!
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on April 02, 2020, 02:00:38 am
(https://cdn.newsday.com/polopoly_fs/1.23667244.1542844519!/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_768/image.jpg) (https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/c_fill,f_auto,fl_progressive,g_center,h_675,pg_1,q_80,w_1200/dnlgneky5i5vqin7moua.jpg) (https://www.media.volvocars.com/image/low/132632/2_1/1/0/jpg)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on April 27, 2020, 03:17:09 am
tm-master-collapsed.tmg has 7 vertices with 7 incident edges:
A66@479&E803@479(A66)&EX108@A66&EXA1@51&N630@A66(479) 39.981136 -6.153497
A7/A689/BorTR/E18/E5/M6(44) 54.93015 -2.94631
A57Liv/A58/B5194/B5199/E20/M57(2) 53.427934 -2.821298
A86(26a)/D86-94Fre/D127-94/D268-94 48.760829 2.318459
A6/A8M/B90/E16/E18/E1/M2(4) 54.678629 -5.979057
A560@M60(27)&A626@M60&A6188@M60&B6104@M60&M60@27&M60@A626 53.416496 -2.148895
A494_W/A548_W/A550/B5441/E22 53.217093 -3.00141
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on April 27, 2020, 11:10:59 am
5 in UK, 1 in France, 1 in Spain :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on April 27, 2020, 01:11:57 pm
Quote from: michih on April 27, 2020, 11:10:59 am
5 in UK, 1 in France, 1 in Spain :)
3 in the UK with the next update - 2 of them had broken concurrencies making the 6-arm junctions 7-arm!
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on April 30, 2020, 08:25:03 am
4 European system activations this morning, adding over 3400 routes and over 19,000 miles.  Thanks to our Europe contributors for making these happen.  About a 9% increase in active routes in one shot, putting us over 40,000.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on October 25, 2020, 05:18:18 pm
We will have more than 60,000 routes in active+preview systems after the next site update.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on October 25, 2020, 08:04:35 pm
Lab2 is updated with a custom script that uncomments usatxf* & usatxr, adding 3517 routes for 41042 miles. :D
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Duke87 on November 15, 2020, 10:43:10 am
Quote from: yakra on October 25, 2020, 08:04:35 pm
Lab2 is updated with a custom script that uncomments usatxf* & usatxr, adding 3517 routes for 41042 miles. :D

Not seeing this popping up in the testing or staging server. Is "Lab2" referring to something else?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on November 15, 2020, 11:23:30 am
Quote from: Duke87 on November 15, 2020, 10:43:10 am
Not seeing this popping up in the testing or staging server. Is "Lab2" referring to something else?
I run my own TM server to test out changes to DataProcessing & Web code. It runs CentOS 7 (as opposed to FreeBSD on noreaster) and runs the C++ siteupdate program rather than the standard Python.
Once upon a time I announced it in the forum (relatively sure it was on the public, rather than Collaborators Only side) but the IP address has since changed, and my router's not even set up for port forwarding, so it's pretty much just my personal playground ATM.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Duke87 on November 15, 2020, 12:20:34 pm
Gotcha. Well I know a couple people who will be happy to hear those systems are getting worked on. I myself will have some mileage to add when they show up on the live side.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on November 17, 2020, 10:02:13 pm
# of user logs errors  as a function of last .list update

Obtain last .list update date & time, with some preprocessing to get ready for spreadsheet
for u in `ls | sed 's~.list~~'`; do git log -n 1 $u.list | grep '^Date:' | sed -r  "s~^Date: +[A-Z][a-z]{2} ([A-Z][a-z]{2} [0-9]{1,2} )(..:..:..) ([0-9]{4}) (...).*~$u\t\1\3\t\2\t\4~"; done

Obtain # of errors in each userlog
for u in `ls | sed 's~.log~~'`; do echo -e $((echo -n '-1+'; tail -n +2 $u.log | grep -m 1 -n '^Processed' | cut -f1 -d:) | bc)"\t$u"; done
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on November 21, 2020, 01:08:31 pm
How many times have our 290 .list files been updated, including the initial commit?
as of d9478ee682bf87d4eed0b99778242cec4a2372f4
Arithmetic mean: 43.3
Median: 17
Standard Deviation: 73.3

michih.list has the most updates, at 630, which is 8 standard deviations above mean.
cl94 is in 2nd place at 372, 4.5 standard deviations above mean.
32 files (11%) have had only one commit ever.

How often is the average .list file updated?
Geometric mean: 31.9 days
Median: 34.5 days
LOL, I don't know what measure of central tendency this is: 4.61 days

Most frequently updated is riiga.list at 0.0016 days between its two commits. :P Not exactly statistically significant, is it? ;D
Second place is vsaharan1897.list at 1.0847 days between its two commits.
Least frequently updated (among those that can be calculated, with >1 commit of course) is noelbotevera.list at 1290.0176 days between its two commits.
michih updates every 3.1352 days.

Code: [Select]
# This will work on Linux, but not FreeBSD. :(
cd $HOME/TravelMapping/UserData/list_files
for u in *; do
  newstr=$(git log -n 1 $u | grep '^Date:' | sed -r 's~^Date: +~~')
  newest=$(date +%s --date="$(echo $newstr | sed -r 's~ [+\-][0-9]{4}$~~')")
  newest=$(echo $newest $(echo $newstr | sed -r 's~.* (.*)..$~\1~') '*' 3600 | bc)
  oldstr=$(git log --follow $u | grep '^Date:' | tail -n 1 | sed -r 's~^Date: +~~')
  oldest=$(date +%s --date="$(echo $oldstr | sed -r 's~ [+\-][0-9]{4}$~~')")
  oldest=$(echo $oldest $(echo $oldstr | sed -r 's~.* (.*)..$~\1~') '*' 3600 | bc)
  updqty=$(git log --follow $u | grep '^Date:' | wc -l)
  if [ $updqty -gt 1 ]; then
    echo -en "$u\t$updqty\t"
    echo "scale=4; ($newest - $oldest) / ($updqty - 1) / 86400" | bc
  fi
done
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: osu-lsu on November 21, 2020, 08:13:33 pm
Michih might be the leader for total different regions traveled in, with 86.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on November 21, 2020, 08:44:14 pm
Quote from: osu-lsu on November 21, 2020, 08:13:33 pm
Michih might be the leader for total different regions traveled in, with 86.
for u in *; do echo -en "$u\t"; echo $(grep -n -m 1 '^System' $u | cut -f1 -d:) - $(grep -n -m 1 '^Overall by region:' $u | cut -f1 -d:) - 1 | bc; done

dharwood.log   148
ua747sp.log    143
sneezy.log      91
bhemphill.log   87
michih.log      86

Who has the most active systems?
for u in *; do echo -en "$u\t"; grep '^System .* (active) overall:' $u | grep -v '(0\.00%)$' | wc -l; done

dharwood.log   171
cinx.log       136
michih.log     133
ua747sp.log    132
bogdymol.log   118


Who has the most active+preview systems?
for u in *; do echo -en "$u\t"; grep '^System .* ([a-z]\+) overall:' $u | grep -v '(0\.00%)$' | wc -l; done

dharwood.log   212
michih.log     163
ua747sp.log    163
cinx.log       146
panda80.log    135
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on November 22, 2020, 02:07:28 am
This dharwood.... :) I don't see that I will ever travel another 63 regions. Would only be possible with an extensive US travel. But traveling 50 new systems - mainly new departement systems in France? - would be a challenge :D
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on December 11, 2020, 11:40:27 am
The average Route has 13.5 HighwaySegments.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on December 25, 2020, 04:45:12 am
Quote from: mapcat on December 20, 2020, 04:30:13 pm
I’ll have time the week after Christmas to deal with anything that needs to be addressed prior to activation.

With the upcoming activation of usaar we will have 299 active systems for more than 1.1 million miles soon :) What will be system no. 300?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: osu-lsu on December 25, 2020, 10:14:49 am
Quote from: michih on December 25, 2020, 04:45:12 am
Quote from: mapcat on December 20, 2020, 04:30:13 pm
I’ll have time the week after Christmas to deal with anything that needs to be addressed prior to activation.

With the upcoming activation of usaar we will have 299 active systems for more than 1.1 million miles soon :) What will be system no. 300?

Hopefully usala
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on December 25, 2020, 12:45:45 pm
How close is usala to being done? We're likely to reach 300 systems by twelfth night.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on December 25, 2020, 02:01:22 pm
usaal has been waiting for peer review, though it probably would take more than 12 days.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on December 25, 2020, 02:28:26 pm
Louisiana was reviewed and is still in preview. Alabama is also in preview but was not yet reviewed.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: mapcat on December 25, 2020, 09:25:37 pm
I won't have time to finish addressing usala's peer review right away. Things are unsettled for the beginning of 2021, so my best guess is that I'll have a little time each week, but won't be wrapping it up until March at the earliest.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: SSOWorld on December 27, 2020, 08:29:52 am
Quote from: michih on December 25, 2020, 04:45:12 am
Quote from: mapcat on December 20, 2020, 04:30:13 pm
I’ll have time the week after Christmas to deal with anything that needs to be addressed prior to activation.

With the upcoming activation of usaar we will have 299 active systems for more than 1.1 million miles soon :) What will be system no. 300?
My bet's on usams making a miraculous appearance including peer review, but given froggie's schedule and priorities - all bets are off 🐸

speaking of usams...
Quote from: Jim on December 25, 2020, 09:41:17 pm
As the only state/provincial system left to draft in the U.S. and Canada, I'd love to see this system get some priority.  Froggie, do you think this will be a priority for you in the near term, and if not, would you be willing to accept some help in drafting this if someone's willing to do it?
I see I'm not the only one inquiring 🦝
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on January 03, 2021, 02:14:12 am
With the activation of four Australian systems last night, we have 303 active systems for currently 1,117,815 miles.
There are also some new preview systems (see https://travelmapping.net/devel/updates.php) which expands to 1,493,384 miles now - close to 1.5m!

Figures can be found on the home page: https://travelmapping.net/
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on January 12, 2021, 09:24:09 am
We have more than 1.5 million miles in preview + active systems now: "66,328 routes for 1,500,132 miles" :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on February 06, 2021, 05:15:21 am
We have 300 "users" (.list files) now: https://travelmapping.net/stat.php
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on February 07, 2021, 09:48:48 am
And over a million waypoints.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on March 25, 2021, 01:58:06 am
Quote from: michih on October 25, 2020, 05:18:18 pm
We will have more than 60,000 routes in active+preview systems after the next site update.

We have more than 70,000 routes in active + preview systems now :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on April 04, 2021, 03:39:51 am
Quote from: michih on March 25, 2021, 01:58:06 am
We have more than 70,000 routes in active + preview systems now :)

I made a very raw estimation how many routes* we currently have per country:

USA 26%
FRA 24%
DEU 8%
GBR 7%
CAN 2%
ROW 33% (each country should have less than 2%, e.g. ROU about 1.9%, AUS 1.8%)

*not considering the route lengths but just the number of chopped routes (wpt files)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on April 28, 2021, 11:58:18 am
What are the most multiplexed US states?

For each region divide the total mileage when we don't account for concurrencies by the total mileage when we do account for concurrencies.
These figures exclude mileage from usaush & usanp, since they're not part of states' primary systems.
However, usasf & whatever other named systems are still counted, so hopefully they don't skew the data too much. :)

GA   1.45022
AK   1.41498
WY   1.35508
OK   1.22513
NC   1.19683
KS   1.17936
CO   1.16963
ME   1.16827
WV   1.16798
WI   1.16339
ID   1.15526
...
AK   1.00536

Alaska's a bit tricky, since its ratio is inflated by its unsigned Interstates concurrent with regular state routes. If we don't count usai in Alaska, the ratio is much lower.
Edit: Wasn't using the most recent HighwayData, due to an undetected git conflict. Redone; ME & WV have swapped places.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: oscar on April 28, 2021, 12:43:02 pm
^ At the other end of the spectrum, Hawaii has no multiplexes at all, except a tiny one between a state route and a county route in Kailua-Kona. The last time it had one between state-maintained routes, in the 1960s, HDOT truncated and renumbered one of the routes to eliminate the multiplex.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on April 28, 2021, 01:57:54 pm
Quote from: oscar on April 28, 2021, 12:43:02 pm
^ At the other end of the spectrum, Hawaii has no multiplexes at all, except a tiny one between a state route and a county route in Kailua-Kona. The last time it had one between state-maintained routes, in the 1960s, HDOT truncated and renumbered one of the routes to eliminate the multiplex.
I do see two short multiplexes:
HI30/3000
HI380/3800
Nonetheless, HI is the least multiplexed US state. In the US, only MP & GU have lower ratios.
Edit: And American Samoa, at 1.0, no concurrencies at all. Didn't notice before, having filtered out those cases at 1.0.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Bickendan on April 28, 2021, 04:39:04 pm
While you're specifying the US, here, I'm curious how West Bengal stacks, considering the concurrencies there.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on April 28, 2021, 07:08:35 pm
Quote from: Bickendan on April 28, 2021, 04:39:04 pm
While you're specifying the US, here, I'm curious how West Bengal stacks, considering the concurrencies there.
Ordering from least-plexed to most-plexed, IND-WB is #262 of 355 regions.

Code: [Select]
1 ALA
1 AND
1 ARE
1 ARG
1 AS
1 BHR
1 BLM
1 BLZ
1 BRN
1 BTN
1 CHN-XZ
1 COM
1 DZA
1 ESP-CE
1 ESP-CN
1 ESP-ML
1 FRO
1 GMB
1 IND-AP
1 IND-GJ
1 IND-MG
1 IND-MP
1 IND-RJ
1 IND-SK
1 IND-UT
1 JAM
1 LBN
1 MAF
1 MEX-AGS
1 MEX-BCS
1 MEX-CAM
1 MEX-CHIS
1 MEX-COL
1 MEX-HGO
1 MEX-NL
1 MEX-QROO
1 MEX-SLP
1 MEX-TAB
1 MYT
1 NCL
1 NGA
1 NT
1 OMN
1 PRK
1 PYF
1 QAT
1 SPM
1 STP
1 TWN
1 WLF
1 YEM
1.00003 ISL
1.00006 MEX-NAY
1.00015 MP
1.0002 MEX-SON
1.00044 MEX-GRO
1.0006 GU
1.00071 HI
1.00092 CHL
1.00106 GTM
1.00152 CYP
1.00224 REU
1.00303 JEY
1.00329 GLP
1.00396 VI
1.00408 MUS
1.00421 MEX-SIN
1.00467 IND-OR
1.00541 MEX-PUE
1.00548 HKG
1.00559 MEX-MOR
1.00589 MEX-GTO
1.00597 IND-BR
1.00605 IND-JH
1.00636 IRQ
1.00642 BRB
1.00716 MEX-CHIH
1.00796 MEX-TAM
1.00989 MNG
1.0098 AUS-ACT
1.0107 MEX-MICH
1.0114 YT
1.01321 MEX-BC
1.01357 AUS-TAS
1.01379 TTO
1.01443 KWT
1.01567 ESP-IB
1.01765 MEX-DF
1.01767 GUF
1.01776 MEX-OAX
1.0182 MEX-VER
1.02047 URY
1.02125 MEX-JAL
1.02215 PHL
1.02307 CHN-SC
1.02316 GNQ
1.02317 MEX-EMEX
1.02319 MLT
1.02445 KHM
1.02449 MEX-COAH
1.02626 SYR
1.02662 MEX-QRO
1.02687 MEX-ZAC
1.03003 MEX-YUC
1.03209 SAU
1.0341 MEX-TLAX
1.03456 MTQ
1.04002 AUS-NSW
1.04007 CHN-HI
1.04013 AUS-VIC
1.04121 VT
1.04132 ESP-NC
1.04212 LAO
1.04362 CHN-SD
1.04435 IND-TG
1.04461 CA
1.04583 PE
1.04643 CT
1.05112 JOR
1.05119 WA
1.05423 ISR
1.05571 LA
1.05635 MD
1.05766 RI
1.05911 KY
1.06496 THA
1.0661 IND-MH
1.06647 IND-TN
1.06777 PR
1.06908 AB
1.06988 MI
1.07022 NJ
1.07085 MB
1.07134 NB
1.07169 LIE
1.07643 DEU-SH
1.077 CHN-CQ
1.07816 NY
1.0798 FRA-IDF
1.08003 DEU-TH
1.08205 MA
1.08238 PA
1.082 AZ
1.08342 IND-CT
1.083 MEX-DGO
1.08442 DEU-ST
1.08528 FL
1.08534 OH
1.08616 OR
1.08664 MT
1.08919 PSE
1.08966 DEU-SN
1.09083 NE
1.09103 FRA-BFC
1.09242 FRA-NOR
1.09258 JPN
1.09345 FRA-HDF
1.09366 IND-UP
1.09371 QC
1.09436 FRA-ARA
1.09444 ENG
1.09723 MN
1.09786 DEU-NI
1.09901 DE
1.10146 CHN-SX
1.10188 WLS
1.10266 ESP-GA
1.10297 FRA-GES
1.10464 SC
1.1047 SK
1.10496 CHN-FJ
1.10591 ALB
1.10684 DEU-NW
1.10691 DEU-RP
1.1093 NV
1.10941 IND-KA
1.11226 TX
1.1125 TN
1.11363 AL
1.11422 NOR
1.11682 DEU-HE
1.11936 NH
1.11978 VA
1.12089 IA
1.12244 IN
1.12297 IL
1.12299 AFG
1.12353 MS
1.12422 NL
1.12652 IMN
1.12675 SVN
1.12708 CHN-TJ
1.12831 NM
1.12904 ND
1.13126 ESP-CM
1.13136 DEU-SL
1.13266 KOR
1.13369 SD
1.13426 AR
1.13849 MO
1.13889 ESP-CL
1.14074 ESP-CB
1.14095 DEU-MV
1.14263 DC
1.14472 UT
1.14564 AUS-SA
1.14679 DEU-BB
1.14731 MAR
1.15034 ROU
1.15097 MMR
1.15184 CHN-QH
1.15526 ID
1.15633 POL
1.15636 BEL
1.15798 DEU-BW
1.15905 TUN
1.16268 LKA
1.16303 ESP-MC
1.16339 WI
1.16682 AUS-WA
1.16726 CHN-NX
1.16798 WV
1.16827 ME
1.16963 CO
1.17091 EGY
1.17293 ESP-AS
1.17479 ESP-AR
1.1768 LVA
1.17859 RKS
1.17904 CZE
1.17914 CHN-JX
1.17936 KS
1.18408 DEU-BY
1.18483 SWE
1.18488 CHN-HB
1.18636 VNM
1.18778 ESP-EX
1.1912 CHN-SN
1.1932 ESP-CT
1.19683 NC
1.19716 ESP-VC
1.19855 NLD
1.1986 IRN
1.20146 NIR
1.20264 CHN-HE
1.20565 IRL
1.20761 ESP-RI
1.20788 IDN
1.20814 CHN-SH
1.21049 ESP-MD
1.21983 CHN-NM
1.22089 BC
1.22513 OK
1.2341 CHN-ZJ
1.2352 MYS
1.23873 IND-AS
1.23886 EST
1.249 AUT
1.25185 CHN-BJ
1.25333 BGD
1.25561 GAB
1.2593 IND-WB
1.26373 DNK
1.26669 LUX
1.26976 CHN-AH
1.28217 SCT
1.28629 LTU
1.28702 AGO
1.28884 CHN-GX
1.29608 DEU-HH
1.30361 HRV
1.30378 MDA
1.30641 FRA-COR
1.30698 CHN-JS
1.30776 ESH
1.3082 SWZ
1.31546 SVK
1.31706 NZL
1.31757 ESP-AN
1.32198 CHN-HN
1.32465 ITA
1.32713 CHN-GD
1.33075 HUN
1.3372 ABW
1.34064 FIN
1.34422 SGP
1.3509 ON
1.35508 WY
1.36803 BGR
1.37651 CHN-GZ
1.37833 DEU-BE
1.38847 NS
1.3939 BDI
1.39901 SEN
1.40343 ZAF
1.41225 NPL
1.41498 AK
1.42613 SRB
1.4307 DEU-HB
1.43617 GRC
1.44358 CHN-LN
1.45022 GA
1.45837 AUS-NT
1.47177 CRM
1.47636 PAK
1.49613 CHE
1.50051 CHN-JL
1.50361 MNE
1.50686 TUR
1.52048 FRA-PAC
1.53382 RWA
1.54364 CHN-HA
1.54791 AUS-QLD
1.54936 CHN-YN
1.5503 COG
1.57222 PRT
1.57474 CHN-GS
1.58985 CHN-HL
1.59877 MWI
1.60171 CHN-XJ
1.60519 ESP-PV
1.61551 FRA-OCC
1.62784 IND-DL
1.63287 FRA-PDL
1.65446 MOZ
1.66221 FRA-BRE
1.72829 LSO
1.7519 IND-HR
1.77609 FRA-CVL
1.80211 BLR
1.87383 UGA
1.87454 BWA
1.90488 IND-PB
1.91376 RUS
1.91966 FRA-NAQ
1.92701 ZMB
1.95101 KGZ
1.954 MKD
1.99102 UKR
1.9912 ZWE
2 IND-ML
2 IND-MN
2 IND-NL
2.07044 ARM
2.21799 KEN
2.22422 COD
2.2539 NAM
2.33964 TZA
2.41468 TJK
2.41897 TKM
2.4952 AZE
2.53922 KAZ
2.54142 UZB
2.60101 BIH
2.71536 GEOData will be affected by stuff like cantch, where some sections will not have more than one number, but be included as a TCH route and as a regular numbered route, FWIW.
So take all this with a grain of salt.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Bickendan on April 28, 2021, 09:59:19 pm
I can imagine where Oregon would be if ORH were included lol
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: jayhawkco on June 30, 2021, 11:26:17 am
I know I read this somewhere (can't remember if it was here or AARoads), but I was curious what is the largest amount of systems in which a user has logged mileage.  I just added the rest of my international travels and wanted to see where I stood.  A search didn't find anything useful.

Chris
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on June 30, 2021, 11:54:58 am
Quote from: jayhawkco on June 30, 2021, 11:26:17 am
I know I read this somewhere (can't remember if it was here or AARoads), but I was curious what is the largest amount of systems in which a user has logged mileage.  I just added the rest of my international travels and wanted to see where I stood.  A search didn't find anything useful.

You can see the figures on the user page. You have travels in 117 systems, dharwood is at 226 systems. I'm at 187.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on June 30, 2021, 12:07:12 pm
Quote from: jayhawkco on June 30, 2021, 11:26:17 am
I was curious what is the largest amount of systems in which a user has logged mileage.

A ranking was proposed in the #452 Project-wide stats page (https://github.com/TravelMapping/Web/issues/452#issuecomment-731717596) Github issue.

Nov 2020 ranking: https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=94.msg20934#msg20934
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: jayhawkco on June 30, 2021, 12:37:20 pm
Don't know how I missed it.  Thanks.  Looks like I'm for sure in the top 5 for regions then.

Chris
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on July 01, 2021, 01:58:21 am
Who's traveled in the most regions?
for u in *; do printf "%03i\t$u\n" `echo $(grep -n -m 1 '^System' $u | cut -f1 -d:) - $(grep -n -m 1 '^Overall by region:' $u | cut -f1 -d:) - 1 | bc`; done | sort | tail -n 5

087   bhemphill.log
090   jayhawkco.log
091   sneezy.log
144   ua747sp.log
148   dharwood.log

Who has the most active systems?
for u in *; do printf "%03i\t$u\n" `grep '^System .* (active) overall:' $u | grep -v '(0\.00%)$' | wc -l`; done | sort | tail -n 5

123   bogdymol.log
138   michih.log
139   cinx.log
142   ua747sp.log
178   dharwood.log

Who has the most active+preview systems?
for u in *; do printf "%03i\t$u\n" `grep '^System .* ([a-z]\+) overall:' $u | grep -v '(0\.00%)$' | wc -l`; done | sort | tail -n 5

147   panda80.log
154   cinx.log
180   ua747sp.log
185   michih.log
226   dharwood.log
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: bhemphill on July 01, 2021, 09:41:10 pm
Only top 5, not 10? :D  Just giving you a hard time Yakra, I know I am close in those other lists.  It will be nice when those ranks are listed on the user page instead of TBD, and/or having a page where the ranks are fully listed.  Then you won't have to grep for curiosity either.  You know it killed the cat. :D  Not having travelled in a while has meant that my recent adds have come from waiting for new roads to be mapped, although there is very little of that left now.  I'll get my planned trips rescheduled here sometime though and get back to adding again.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on July 18, 2021, 02:49:47 am
Quote from: michih on March 25, 2021, 01:58:06 am
Quote from: michih on October 25, 2020, 05:18:18 pm
We will have more than 60,000 routes in active+preview systems after the next site update.

We have more than 70,000 routes in active + preview systems now :)

We have more then 75,000 routes in active + preview systems now (75,222 routes for 1,555,070 miles).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on December 22, 2021, 02:34:41 pm
Quote from: michih on July 18, 2021, 02:49:47 am
Quote from: michih on March 25, 2021, 01:58:06 am
Quote from: michih on October 25, 2020, 05:18:18 pm
We will have more than 60,000 routes in active+preview systems after the next site update.

We have more than 70,000 routes in active + preview systems now :)

We have more then 75,000 routes in active + preview systems now (75,222 routes for 1,555,070 miles).

We will have more than 80,000 routes in active + preview systems with the next site update.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on January 12, 2022, 12:58:41 pm
Quote from: michih on January 12, 2021, 09:24:09 am
We have more than 1.5 million miles in preview + active systems now: "66,328 routes for 1,500,132 miles" :)

We have more than 1.6 million miles now: "81,604 routes for 1,600,048 miles"
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 12, 2022, 01:23:36 pm
That's 2575027.649 km!
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: osu-lsu on January 12, 2022, 05:50:07 pm
How do those numbers translate into Kelvin?  :o 8) ;D
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 12, 2022, 07:18:46 pm
Well, it's 12800384 furlongs (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FFF_system)...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on January 12, 2022, 07:42:57 pm
I do not think looking up the number of cubits (apparently about 18 inches according to the back of my Bible) is worth it.   :D
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 12, 2022, 08:06:46 pm
I like to discuss my car's fuel efficiency in terms of furlongs per pint to mess with people.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on January 13, 2022, 11:56:54 am
Quote from: yakra on January 12, 2022, 08:06:46 pm
I like to discuss my car's fuel efficiency in terms of furlongs per pint to mess with people.
Still more logical than litres/100km that the Europeans use!
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: ntallyn on January 15, 2022, 05:30:11 pm
Quote from: yakra on January 12, 2022, 08:06:46 pm
I like to discuss my car's fuel efficiency in terms of furlongs per pint to mess with people.
If my math is right, furlongs per cup would match up exactly to mpg. :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 15, 2022, 05:51:31 pm
8 US liquid pints to a US liquid gallon; 8 furlongs to a mile. ;)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: formulanone on January 18, 2022, 12:15:49 pm
Curious to know what is the most-clinched highway by TM users?

I'm guessing DC 295 (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=dc.dc295), which has 116 clinches by 121 total drivers. 

(If we have another thread for these kinds of questions, please feel free move it there.)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: jayhawkco on January 18, 2022, 12:18:14 pm
Quote from: formulanone on January 18, 2022, 12:15:49 pm
Curious to know what is the most-clinched highway by TM users?

I'm guessing DC 295 (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=dc.dc295), which has 116 clinches by 121 total drivers. 

(If we have another thread for these kinds of questions, please feel free move it there.)

Just a quick look, but I-95 in DE has been clinched by 126 users.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on January 18, 2022, 12:33:20 pm
I think the current battle (within a state/district/region) is between I-95/I-495 in DC (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?units=miles&u=markkos1992&r=dc.i095&lat=38.792439&lon=-77.038005&zoom=19) (156) and I-295 in DE (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?units=miles&u=markkos1992&r=de.i295&lat=39.701442&lon=-75.635118&zoom=13) (154).

Of course, Jim or yakra will give us the updated stats in a few hours.   ;)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 18, 2022, 04:41:51 pm
Quote from: formulanone on January 18, 2022, 12:15:49 pm
Curious to know what is the most-clinched highway by TM users?

I'm guessing DC 295 (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=dc.dc295), which has 116 clinches by 121 total drivers. 

(If we have another thread for these kinds of questions, please feel free move it there.)
I wanna say this is the best thread for it.

Quote from: Markkos1992 on January 18, 2022, 12:33:20 pm
Of course, Jim or yakra will give us the updated stats in a few hours.   ;)
LOL, sometimes I'm too fond of shell scripts for my own good. I wasted a bunch of time pulling ConnectedRoute data from the user logs, only to realize that unrelated routes would be counted together, e.g. all flavors of A1 (prta, mara, fraa, etc.) and that I should just query the DB instead.

This doesn't harm us for ConnectedRoutes though, as the top 10 aren't affected by this:
098   I-495 (Washington, DC)
099   I-290 (New York)
102   I-97
104   I-495 (Delaware)
108   I-270 (Maryland)
109   I-295 (Maryland - District of Columbia)
113   I-395 (Baltimore, MD)
114   I-695 (District of Columbia)
116   DC295
116   I-595 (Maryland)
116   I-68
126   I-270Spr (Ashleigh, MD)

Quote from: Markkos1992 on January 18, 2022, 12:33:20 pm
I think the current battle (within a state/district/region) is between I-95/I-495 in DC (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?units=miles&u=markkos1992&r=dc.i095&lat=38.792439&lon=-77.038005&zoom=19) (156) and I-295 in DE (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?units=miles&u=markkos1992&r=de.i295&lat=39.701442&lon=-75.635118&zoom=13) (154).
The top chopped routes will probably also not be affected by that artificial inflation, but why not do it right (and faster). I'm running a site update on lab2 right now, and will query the DB and post an update here when done.
Edit: And here it is:
120  wv.i081
121  il.i041
121  ma.i084
122  wv.i070
125  ga.i024
126  de.i095
126  md.i270sprash
129  va.i395
130  ga.i095
138  tn.i024cha
154  de.i295
156  dc.i495
156  dc.i095
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: kjslaughter on January 19, 2022, 10:56:08 am
Quote from: yakra on January 18, 2022, 04:41:51 pm
Quote from: formulanone on January 18, 2022, 12:15:49 pm
Curious to know what is the most-clinched highway by TM users?

I'm guessing DC 295 (https://travelmapping.net/hb/showroute.php?r=dc.dc295), which has 116 clinches by 121 total drivers. 

(If we have another thread for these kinds of questions, please feel free move it there.)
I wanna say this is the best thread for it.

Quote from: Markkos1992 on January 18, 2022, 12:33:20 pm
Of course, Jim or yakra will give us the updated stats in a few hours.   ;)
LOL, sometimes I'm too fond of shell scripts for my own good. I wasted a bunch of time pulling ConnectedRoute data from the user logs, only to realize that unrelated routes would be counted together, e.g. all flavors of A1 (prta, mara, fraa, etc.) and that I should just query the DB instead.

This doesn't harm us for ConnectedRoutes though, as the top 10 aren't affected by this:
098   I-495 (Washington, DC)
099   I-290 (New York)
102   I-97
104   I-495 (Delaware)
108   I-270 (Maryland)
109   I-295 (Maryland - District of Columbia)
113   I-395 (Baltimore, MD)
114   I-695 (District of Columbia)
116   DC295
116   I-595 (Maryland)
116   I-68
126   I-270Spr (Ashleigh, MD)


So does everyone on site live near DC or it's just a very popular place to visit?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: jayhawkco on January 19, 2022, 10:57:48 am
Interesting that GA I-95 is on there.  All of the other top 10 segments are < 25 miles and GA I-95 is 114.18 miles.  Also not in the same area as most of the others.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on January 19, 2022, 11:21:31 am
Quote
So does everyone on site live near DC or it's just a very popular place to visit?

I would argue that the answer is sort of both.  Many of us live in the Mid-Atlantic or Northeast.  The most highly attended road meets are in this area for a reason.

Quote
Interesting that GA I-95 is on there.  All of the other top 10 segments are < 25 miles and GA I-95 is 114.18 miles.  Also not in the same area as most of the others.

I would presume this is because most of us heading to Florida use I-95, and stopping in Georgia is not very beneficial beyond Savannah.  Georgia does have gas stations called "El Cheapo".   ;D
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: jayhawkco on January 19, 2022, 11:25:31 am
Another interesting question to ask is what segment of highway have the most users been on, i.e. I-95 in DE between exits 2 and 4.  I bet there is some location that beats out I-95/495 in DC.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: osu-lsu on January 19, 2022, 02:34:36 pm
Quote from: kjslaughter on January 19, 2022, 10:56:08 am
Quote from: yakra on January 18, 2022, 04:41:51 pm

This doesn't harm us for ConnectedRoutes though, as the top 10 aren't affected by this:
098   I-495 (Washington, DC)
099   I-290 (New York)
102   I-97
104   I-495 (Delaware)
108   I-270 (Maryland)
109   I-295 (Maryland - District of Columbia)
113   I-395 (Baltimore, MD)
114   I-695 (District of Columbia)
116   DC295
116   I-595 (Maryland)
116   I-68
126   I-270Spr (Ashleigh, MD)


So does everyone on site live near DC or it's just a very popular place to visit?

Can't speak for others, but when I was a kid, my school district would send the 8th Graders on a multi-day field trip to Washington DC. There were fundraisers and parents would help foot the bill, teachers would accompany us as chaperones.
Thus my mileage around D.C.* was based on (attempting to) remembering the routing, and what was built, 30 (now 33) years ago.
* - not counting mileage I picked around Northern Virginia a year and a half ago
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on January 19, 2022, 02:43:40 pm
Quote from: jayhawkco on January 19, 2022, 11:25:31 am
Another interesting question to ask is what segment of highway have the most users been on, i.e. I-95 in DE between exits 2 and 4.  I bet there is some location that beats out I-95/495 in DC.

One way to check this with a program is to use the traveled format graphs and see which has the most travelers.  But maybe more fun for those who want to search visually, load up mapview, switch to "Color by Traveler Count" and your legend at the lower left will show the highest number of travelers among the segments in the current view.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: jayhawkco on January 19, 2022, 03:04:31 pm
Quote from: Jim on January 19, 2022, 02:43:40 pm
Quote from: jayhawkco on January 19, 2022, 11:25:31 am
Another interesting question to ask is what segment of highway have the most users been on, i.e. I-95 in DE between exits 2 and 4.  I bet there is some location that beats out I-95/495 in DC.

One way to check this with a program is to use the traveled format graphs and see which has the most travelers.  But maybe more fun for those who want to search visually, load up mapview, switch to "Color by Traveler Count" and your legend at the lower left will show the highest number of travelers among the segments in the current view.

Unless I'm missing another, DE I-95 between exits 4A and 5A has 177 travelers.  Haven't found more than that yet.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 19, 2022, 07:15:40 pm
Quote from: kjslaughter on January 19, 2022, 10:56:08 am
Quote from: yakra on January 18, 2022, 04:41:51 pm
098   I-495 (Washington, DC)
099   I-290 (New York)
102   I-97
104   I-495 (Delaware)
108   I-270 (Maryland)
109   I-295 (Maryland - District of Columbia)
113   I-395 (Baltimore, MD)
114   I-695 (District of Columbia)
116   DC295
116   I-595 (Maryland)
116   I-68
126   I-270Spr (Ashleigh, MD)
So does everyone on site live near DC or it's just a very popular place to visit?
Quote from: Markkos1992 on January 19, 2022, 11:21:31 am
I would argue that the answer is sort of both.  Many of us live in the Mid-Atlantic or Northeast.  The most highly attended road meets are in this area for a reason.
Good-ol' eastern seaboard. The most users, the densest population in the US, densest freeway network, and probably by extension the most places people are likely to travel to. Surely the highest AADTs and VMTs. With DC as a pretty central location, and a destination in its own right.
Worth noting that all those ConnectedRoutes enter a region the I-95 corridor is in, with only I-68 not being entirely in I-95 regions.

Quote from: jayhawkco on January 19, 2022, 10:57:48 am
Interesting that GA I-95 is on there.  All of the other top 10 segments are < 25 miles and GA I-95 is 114.18 miles.  Also not in the same area as most of the others.
Interesting fact about the mileage; that's quite an outlier.
The ones that surprised me a little were the I-24 entries.
Then there's IL I-41, farther away from the east coast but a pretty easy clinch at 1.05 mi. It's also part of I-94.

Quote from: jayhawkco on January 19, 2022, 11:25:31 am
Another interesting question to ask is what segment of highway have the most users been on, i.e. I-95 in DE between exits 2 and 4.  I bet there is some location that beats out I-95/495 in DC.
This got some discussion in the past. I won't search for it (could even be earlier in this thread? Maybe?), not having a good search term, but I do remember the most-traveled segment was somewhere on DE I-95. My first guess was between the PA border and the I-495 split (maybe it was at some point in the past?), but nope. Your answer is pretty close...

Quote from: Jim on January 19, 2022, 02:43:40 pm
One way to check this with a program is to use the traveled format graphs and see which has the most travelers.
Thought of doing this as a shell script before deciding to again just query the DB -- though not everyone has a DB to query.
So here's a shell script anyway just for fun:
Code: [Select]
max=0
v=`head -n 2 tm-master-traveled.tmg | tail -n 1 | cut -f1 -d' '`
e=`head -n 2 tm-master-traveled.tmg | tail -n 1 | cut -f2 -d' '`
n=0
for line in `tail -n +$(expr $v + 3) tm-master-traveled.tmg | tr ' ' '%'`; do
  echo -en "$n/$e\r"
  t=0
  code=`echo $line | cut -f4 -d%`
  for c in `echo $code | sed -r 's~(.)~\1 ~g'`; do
    case $c in
    1) t=`expr $t + 1`;;
    2) t=`expr $t + 1`;;
    3) t=`expr $t + 2`;;
    4) t=`expr $t + 1`;;
    5) t=`expr $t + 2`;;
    6) t=`expr $t + 2`;;
    7) t=`expr $t + 3`;;
    8) t=`expr $t + 1`;;
    9) t=`expr $t + 2`;;
    A) t=`expr $t + 2`;;
    B) t=`expr $t + 3`;;
    C) t=`expr $t + 2`;;
    D) t=`expr $t + 3`;;
    E) t=`expr $t + 3`;;
    F) t=`expr $t + 4`;;
    esac
  done
  if [ $max -le $t ]; then
    max=$t
    printf "$t: %s from %s to %s\n" \
      `echo $line | cut -f3 -d'%'` \
      `tail -n +$(expr $(echo $line | cut -f1 -d'%') + 3) tm-master-traveled.tmg | head -n 1 | cut -f1 -d' '` \
      `tail -n +$(expr $(echo $line | cut -f2 -d'%') + 3) tm-master-traveled.tmg | head -n 1 | cut -f1 -d' '`
  fi
  n=`expr $n + 1`
doneThis will take quite a long time to run. :D

Quote from: Jim on January 19, 2022, 02:43:40 pm
But maybe more fun for those who want to search visually, load up mapview, switch to "Color by Traveler Count" and your legend at the lower left will show the highest number of travelers among the segments in the current view.
Ooh nice. I Color by Traveler Count pretty infrequently, and hadn't really paid attention to the legend. This is a good clue of what to look for.
Start in DC, enable "Always Update Visible Routes", scroll around up toward Philadelphia, ?, profit!
This will surely be more fun for the majority of people who aren't crazy into coding. :)

Quote from: jayhawkco on January 19, 2022, 03:04:31 pm
Unless I'm missing another, DE I-95 between exits 4A and 5A has 177 travelers.  Haven't found more than that yet.
Ding ding ding! We have a winner! The DB says DE I-95 4A 4B and DE I-95 4B 5A () are tied for 1st place.

Quote from: osu-lsu on January 19, 2022, 02:34:36 pm
Can't speak for others, but when I was a kid, my school district would send the 8th Graders on a multi-day field trip to Washington DC. There were fundraisers and parents would help foot the bill, teachers would accompany us as chaperones.
Thus my mileage around D.C.* was based on (attempting to) remembering the routing, and what was built, 30 (now 33) years ago.
I'd also need to reconstruct travels from when I was a small child; I visited DC around age 2. I could probably get away with marking I-95 down to I-695. South of there, no idea if I was on 95 or 295 or what.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on January 19, 2022, 07:54:41 pm
The most traveled segment in PA seems to be the I-95/US 322 concurrency (PA I-95 3 4) with 155 travelers. 

I was thinking that it would be somewhere on I-81, but I-70 has segments that are much closer (153 with I-76 between 146 and 161 with the entire I-70/I-76 concurrency being between 149 and 153 travelers, and then 149 travelers on the I-70/I-79 concurrency in Washington).

In VA, I am getting VA I-95 130 133, but all of I-95 between I-295 and I-495 seems to stay consistently above 170 travelers.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 19, 2022, 08:34:10 pm
The most traveled segment in all four Siena area graphs is the I-87/90 overlap, with 132 travlers.


PA & VA are tied for the most travelers in a region, at 243.
Code: [Select]
for g in *-region-traveled.tmg; do printf "%03i $g\n" `tail -n 1 $g | wc -w`; done | grep -v ^000 | sort
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: formulanone on January 19, 2022, 09:02:07 pm
It's funny that the most-travelled "state route" is DC 295, also not in a state. :pan:

Or are there any other Tier 3 route segments with more travelers?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 19, 2022, 10:20:50 pm
State routes are Tier 4.

Code: [Select]
select count(cl.segmentId), cl.segmentId, s.root, w1.pointName, w2.pointName, r.systemName, h.tier from clinched as cl left join segments as s on s.segmentId = cl.segmentId left join routes as r on r.root = s.root left join systems as h on h.systemName = r.systemName left join waypoints as w1 on w1.pointId = s.waypoint1 left join waypoints as w2 on w2.pointId = s.waypoint2 where tier = 4 group by cl.segmentId order by count(cl.segmentId) asc;The most traveled Tier 4 segment is IL IL3 I-55(1A) I-55(1B), with 154 travelers.

Code: [Select]
select count(cl.route), cl.route, r.systemName, h.tier from clinchedRoutes as cl left join routes as r on r.root = cl.route left join systems as h on h.systemName = r.systemName where tier = 4 group by cl.route order by count(cl.route) asc;The most traveled Tier 4 route is CA1, with 177 travelers.

Code: [Select]
select count(cl.route), cl.route, r.systemName, h.tier from clinchedRoutes as cl left join routes as r on r.root = cl.route left join systems as h on h.systemName = r.systemName where tier = 4 and clinched = 1 group by cl.route order by count(cl.route) asc;The most clinched is, as we know, DC295 with 116 travelers.


Other fun ideas for stats:
mean & median # of travelers/clinchers for HighwaySegments, chopped Routes, and ConnectedRoutes, including & excluding those with 0 travelers.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: dave1693 on January 22, 2022, 10:01:48 pm
Quote from: yakra on January 19, 2022, 07:15:40 pm
I'd also need to reconstruct travels from when I was a small child; I visited DC around age 2. I could probably get away with marking I-95 down to I-695. South of there, no idea if I was on 95 or 295 or what.

My first two visits to DC were in 1968 but the first of those was by train. The second, just after Christmas, was by car, which was my introduction to the Delaware Memorial Bridge, Baltimore Harbor Tunnel, and a very small chunk of the DC Beltway. I-95 didn't follow the NJ Turnpike all the way to Exit 6 as it does now, so we didn't tough it until we reached Delaware, picking it up at the modern I-95/295/495 interchange and taking it down to the north/east end of I-895 in Baltimore. I-95 in Maryland was not completed anywhere through or south of Baltimore until after the spring of 1972; we went by car to DC that spring, in part to see the pandas at the National Zoo, and the Baltimore-Washington Parkway was the only freeway connection open between 695 and 495. It was still marked with "Temporary I-95" signs then.

Pretty sure that I-95 was signed all the way from Templeton (south of Petersburg) to US 50 in DC (north end of the Capitol Hill Tunnel) by 1972, but my old maps are in storage so I can't doublecheck.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 23, 2022, 12:41:05 am
Would have been 1982-1983ish for me, before the Fort McHenry Tunnel opened.
We'd have surely stopped to visit relatives in Baltimore. Where though?
*does quick Google search*
*gets actual meaningful results*
In all likelihood, went around the north side of 695.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: dave1693 on January 23, 2022, 10:08:03 pm
Quote from: yakra on January 23, 2022, 12:41:05 am
Would have been 1982-1983ish for me, before the Fort McHenry Tunnel opened..

Yes, pre-Fort McHenry Tunnel. I-95 did exist inside 695 but don't know how close it got to the north/east end of the unbuilt tunnel then. 95 went as far as 395 on the south/west side. On occasion I would drive up 95 and 395, and around the Inner Harbor to the south end of the JFX, er, I-83. (For those that don't know, JFX is Baltimorese for the Jones Falls Expressway, which is I-83 inside 695 plus the tiny stub that connects to MD 25 just outside 695.)

South/west of 695, by 1982-83 I-95 was complete in Maryland and followed its current routing all the way to the DC line, and was complete in Virginia. The last segment in southern VA was finished in... I want to say 1979 but cannot verify off the top of my head.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on January 23, 2022, 11:00:12 pm
Quote from: dave1693 on January 23, 2022, 10:08:03 pm
Baltimorese
The language of Balmer Murland!*

Visiting said relative's parents' house in `92, I found a book entitled (iirc) Baltimorese.
There was an entry for each letter of the alphabet; the only one I remember now is
Quote
K is for Kroddy,
a far eastern art.
A kick to the jaw
is a good way to start.
*Don't know if "Merlin" is a more common spelling, but the book used Murland.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on February 11, 2022, 01:17:05 pm
Top 10 routes for most labels in use:
for line in `tail -n +2 pointsinuse.log | tr ' ' '#'`; do printf '%03i %s\n' `expr $(echo "$line" | tr '#' ' ' | wc -w) - 1` `echo "$line" | cut -f1 -d'('`; done | sort | tail
145 nc.us064
149 ny.ny005
158 ga.us041
160 tn.us070
169 ca.ca001
169 ky.us060
175 nc.us070
177 ca.i005
218 fl.us001
261 ca.us101
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on February 13, 2022, 11:21:12 am
Highest ratio of chopped to connected routes:
1.736    33    19   cantch
1.869   286   153   deua
1.883   373   198   chng
2.057   144    70   asiah
2.444   836   342   eure
2.500    45    18   afrtah
2.512   103    41   eure2
2.764    94    34   indnh
3.363   148    44   asiahp
3.613   813   225   usaus

Not ratios, just the raw differences between the counts
0090   429   339   espn
0104   148    44   asiahp
0115   737   622   itass2
0133   286   153   deua
0166   606   440   mexf
0175   373   198   chng
0198   556   358   usai
0236   965   729   deub
0494   836   342   eure
0588   813   225   usaus
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on March 08, 2022, 03:48:50 pm
We have 20 travelers in the 100,000 miles club now*. Welcome @formulanone :)

*preview+active systems
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: formulanone on March 09, 2022, 09:34:20 am
Thanks for the welcome to the 100K club!

Though Ib3kii is on an absolute tear and will overtake me soon enough...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Ib3kii on March 10, 2022, 03:51:13 pm
Quote from: formulanone on March 09, 2022, 09:34:20 am
Thanks for the welcome to the 100K club!

Though Ib3kii is on an absolute tear and will overtake me soon enough...

Ha! I wish. I did a lot of damage to my car in 2021. I went from the east coast to the west coast twice and probably doubled my total miles in one year alone. After my last trip, my car hit 200,000 miles (had only about 120,000 a year prior) and then it started making noise...

Long story short, it will be a few months before I will be traveling again. Rest assured I'll be going back to large trips every other weekend when that time comes.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on April 10, 2022, 10:49:19 am
Inspired by this (https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=4774). What's (currently) the lowest number missing on TM? Lowest overall number, lowest in EUR, lowest in NA?

That means, what's the (current) "end of the game"?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on April 10, 2022, 12:05:42 pm
Quote from: michih on April 10, 2022, 10:49:19 am
Lowest overall number, lowest in EUR, lowest in NA?
Just going for the lowest overall number here; not going to attempt to break it down by continent.

Including only systems in the HB (whether devel systems are included or not), it's 1386.
Adding in systems commented out of systems.csv fills in 56 missing numbers, bringing us up to 1928.

Showing my work. From the HighwayData/hwy_data/_systems directory:
Code: [Select]
# Keep track of commented-out systems; these will be highlighted in red in the results
BigOlRegex=$(tail -n +2 ../../systems.csv | grep '^#' | grep -v 'Systems' | cut -f1 -d';' | tr '#\n' '^;' | sed -e 's~;~;\.\*|~g' -e 's~|$~~')

# Make a list of CSVs for all system codes in systems.csv
# Put commented-out systems at the end to ensure we only get results from these systems if there's no other option
l_csvs=$(tail -n +2 ../../systems.csv | grep -v '^#' | cut -f1 -d';' | sed 's~.*~&.csv~'; \
         tail -n +2 ../../systems.csv | grep '^#' | grep -v 'Systems' | cut -f1 -d';' | sed -r 's~#(.*)~\1.csv~')

# List only those .csv files that actually exist
e_csvs=''
for csv in $l_csvs; do
  if [ -e $csv ]; then e_csvs="$e_csvs $csv"; fi
done

# Iterate thru numbers & search, stopping when there's no result
res=SomethingWithOneOrMoreCharacters
e=`echo -en '\e'`
n=1
while [ `echo -n "$res" | wc -c` != 0 ]; do
  res=$(cat $e_csvs | grep -m 1 ".*;.*;[A-Za-z]*$n[A-Za-z]*;.*;.*;.*;.*;.*")
  echo "$res" | sed -r "s~$BigOlRegex~$e[31m&$e[0m~"
  n=`expr $n + 1`
done
Edit: Last sed expression in BigOlRegex
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on April 10, 2022, 12:22:09 pm
Thanks :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on April 10, 2022, 06:56:05 pm
a.k.a the lowest route number that doesn't exist in Kentucky or elsewhere...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on April 10, 2022, 08:56:38 pm
Indeed, lots of Kentucky in the results of that script, despite usaky being pretty late in the alphabet.
The vast majority is in KY from about route 1540 up.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on April 11, 2022, 04:55:47 am
1540 sounds like a B road. The zonal system kills a continuous number stream of 3500 routes.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: formulanone on April 15, 2022, 06:08:41 pm
Our 1-2-3 Road Sign game at AARoads nearly came to a halt until I found De Kalb County had a few 1900 routes near Rainsville, Alabama:

(https://live.staticflickr.com/7868/46106079985_4344eed718_c.jpg) (https://flic.kr/p/2dfeHgx)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on April 19, 2022, 05:11:20 pm
Code: [Select]
#cd $HOME/tm/HighwayData/hwy_data/_systems/ #or like wherever
systems=$(tail -n +2 ../../systems.csv | grep -v '^#' | cut -f1 -d';')
region_counts=$(for s in $systems; do printf "%03i;$s\n" $(tail -n +2 $s.csv | cut -f2 -d';' | sort | uniq | wc -l); done | sort)

for region_count in $(echo "$region_counts" | cut -f1 -d';' | sort | uniq); do
  system_count=$(echo "$region_counts" | grep -c "^$region_count;")
  if [ $system_count = 1 ]
    then s_plural=''
         e_plural='s'
    else s_plural='s'
         e_plural=''
  fi
  printf "%i system%s exist%s in %i region" \
    $system_count \
    "$s_plural" \
    "$e_plural" \
    $(echo $region_count | sed 's~^0*~~')
  if [ $region_count -gt 1 ]
    then echo -n s
    else echo -n ' each'
  fi
  if [ $system_count -le 5 ]
    then echo -n ": "; echo ": $region_counts" | grep "^$region_count;" | cut -f2 -d';' | tr '\n' ',' | sed -e 's~,~, ~g' -e 's~, $~\n~'
    else echo
  fi
done360 systems exist in 1 region each
75 systems exist in 2 regions
16 systems exist in 3 regions
5 systems exist in 4 regions: asiaho, ausn, ausstr, cism, fraidfd77
3 systems exist in 5 regions: afrea, ausm, cannf
3 systems exist in 7 regions: asimo, ausa, mexed
1 system exists in 8 regions: asim
1 system exists in 10 regions: cantch
3 systems exist in 12 regions: fraa, fran, index
3 systems exist in 13 regions: afrrtr, mexsf, usaif
1 system exists in 14 regions: indnh
2 systems exist in 15 regions: espa, usaush
2 systems exist in 16 regions: deua, eurtr
1 system exists in 17 regions: espn
1 system exists in 19 regions: deub
1 system exists in 23 regions: afrtah
3 systems exist in 25 regions: asiah, usaib, usasf
1 system exists in 30 regions: chng
2 systems exist in 31 regions: mexd, usanp
2 systems exist in 32 regions: eursf, mexf
1 system exists in 48 regions: usausb (MA has none)
1 system exists in 49 regions: usaus
1 system exists in 50 regions: asiahp
1 system exists in 52 regions: usai
1 system exists in 92 regions: eure

Mean: 2.778 regions per system
Median: 1
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: osu-lsu on April 20, 2022, 10:56:56 pm
Which region has 360 systems?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on April 21, 2022, 12:18:25 am
My guess would be the U.S between all the individual Interstate, U.S., state, auxiliary, and national park routes.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on April 21, 2022, 05:17:09 am
Quote from: osu-lsu on April 20, 2022, 10:56:56 pm
Which region has 360 systems?
Other way around. 360 systems are in only 1 region.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on April 21, 2022, 09:23:06 am
Earth!  ;D
Post (and script) modified.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on April 21, 2022, 01:46:53 pm
Region with the most systems would be a French oneI'm going to go with Auverge-Rhone-Alpes as the winner.

And there will be a large number of regions with only one system in them.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on April 21, 2022, 03:42:50 pm
Quote from: si404 on April 21, 2022, 01:46:53 pm
Region with the most systems would be a French one
  • fraa
  • eure
  • fran
  • several M/D systems
  • possibly eursf and/or eurtr
I'm going to go with Auverge-Rhone-Alpes as the winner.

ARA (https://travelmapping.net/user/region.php?u=michih&rg=FRA-ARA) (Warning: Don't open the link) has 24 systems but I have not yet drafted 4 M route systems lacking signposting.

eure - UNECE International 'E' Roads - 1038.63 miles
eursf - Europe Select Named Freeways - 29.75 miles
eurtr - Europe Select Tourist and Scenic Routes - 207.88 miles
fraa - France Autoroutes - 1034.53 miles
fraarad01 - Ain Routes DĂ©partementales - 2565.53 miles
fraarad03 - Allier Routes DĂ©partementales - 3106.29 miles
fraarad07 - Ardèche Routes Départementales - 1826.77 miles
fraarad15 - Cantal Routes DĂ©partementales - 2146.56 miles
fraarad26 - DrĂ´me Routes DĂ©partementales - 2248.69 miles
fraarad38 - Isère Routes Départementales - 2769.04 miles
fraarad42 - Loire Routes DĂ©partementales - 2027.01 miles
fraarad43 - Haute-Loire Routes DĂ©partementales - 1841.87 miles
fraarad63 - Puy-de-DĂ´me Routes DĂ©partementales - 3858.08 miles
fraarad69 - RhĂ´ne Routes DĂ©partementales - 1475.17 miles
fraarad73 - Savoie Routes DĂ©partementales - 1542.18 miles
fraarad74 - Haute-Savoie Routes DĂ©partementales - 1508.75 miles
frabfcd58 - Nièvre Routes Départementales - 1.06 miles
frabfcd71 - SaĂ´ne-et-Loire Routes DĂ©partementales - 0.45 miles
fracvld18 - Cher Routes DĂ©partementales - 2.11 miles
fran - France Routes Nationales - 636.86 miles
fraoccd12 - Aveyron Routes DĂ©partementales - 0.82 miles
fraoccd46 - Lot Routes DĂ©partementales - 2.04 miles
fraoccd48 - Lozère Routes Départementales - 2.36 miles
frapacd05 - Hautes-Alpes Routes DĂ©partementales - 0.97 miles
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on April 30, 2022, 01:26:21 pm
As of yesterday, all .list files combined had:
403921 good lines
1871 "unknown region/highway combo" errors
635 notes about AltRouteNames replaced with canonical names. These can be from either good or bad .list lines. I expected this number to be a bit bigger.
Title: Re: Project Statistics - active+preview routes
Post by: michih on May 01, 2022, 04:07:39 pm
Quote from: michih on December 22, 2021, 02:34:41 pm
Quote from: michih on July 18, 2021, 02:49:47 am
Quote from: michih on March 25, 2021, 01:58:06 am
Quote from: michih on October 25, 2020, 05:18:18 pm
We will have more than 60,000 routes in active+preview systems after the next site update.

We have more than 70,000 routes in active + preview systems now :)

We have more than 75,000 routes in active + preview systems now (75,222 routes for 1,555,070 miles).

We will have more than 80,000 routes in active + preview systems with the next site update.

We have more than 85,000 routes now (85,704 routes for 1,637,364 miles)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on May 01, 2022, 04:17:42 pm
We have 318 active and 160 preview systems now (plus 32 in devel). That means, more than 1/3 of the "completed" systems are in preview only.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Bickendan on May 10, 2022, 02:27:42 pm
Quote from: yakra on April 30, 2022, 01:26:21 pm
As of yesterday, all .list files combined had:
403921 good lines
1871 "unknown region/highway combo" errors
635 notes about AltRouteNames replaced with canonical names. These can be from either good or bad .list lines. I expected this number to be a bit bigger.
A decent chunk of those are mine, as I'm tracking ORH in my .list
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on May 10, 2022, 03:12:13 pm
Quote from: Bickendan on May 10, 2022, 02:27:42 pm
Quote from: yakra on April 30, 2022, 01:26:21 pm
As of yesterday, all .list files combined had:
403921 good lines
1871 "unknown region/highway combo" errors
635 notes about AltRouteNames replaced with canonical names. These can be from either good or bad .list lines. I expected this number to be a bit bigger.
A decent chunk of those are mine, as I'm tracking ORH in my .list

155 errors (8%) including 12 for other US states and 10 for Europe (it's DEU, not DUE ;)).

Edit: You can simply add a # to the list file line to avoid these error reports. E.g.:
Code: [Select]
OR ORH3 US26 OR99E
-->
#OR ORH3 US26 OR99E
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: formulanone on May 18, 2022, 09:13:19 pm
Congratulations to Ib3kii in joining the 100,000 mile club!
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: mapcat on May 18, 2022, 11:19:56 pm
Quote from: formulanone on May 18, 2022, 09:13:19 pm
Congratulations to Ib3kii in joining the 100,000 mile club!

Cheers!
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on May 19, 2022, 06:34:28 am
Quote from: formulanone on May 18, 2022, 09:13:19 pm
Congratulations to Ib3kii in joining the 100,000 mile club!

Yay!!!  I'll be in the 50,000 miles club once I update my list file from my latest trip.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Ib3kii on May 21, 2022, 01:58:46 am
I appreciate that! :)

I've got my eyes on the prize. I'm already aiming to hit 200,000 unique miles sooner than later. It's back to 3,000-4,000 mile trips every other weekend, now that I got my new car.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: formulanone on May 22, 2022, 10:38:55 am
Quote from: Markkos1992 on May 19, 2022, 06:34:28 am
Quote from: formulanone on May 18, 2022, 09:13:19 pm
Congratulations to Ib3kii in joining the 100,000 mile club!

Yay!!!  I'll be in the 50,000 miles club once I update my list file from my latest trip.

[double-checks...] Why did I think you were already way above that?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on June 10, 2022, 11:34:08 pm
A little TM trivia question about something I noticed as I was looking at traveled-format graph data this evening.  By looking at the number of travelers (well, list files, not unique individuals) in the traveled format graphs, we can see how many different .list files are credited with at least one segment in the TM data covered by the graph.  Of course, the tm-master graph has the most - every user's claimed travels somewhere.  Then next up for most travelers are the NA-continent and USA-country graphs.  Not surprising. 

The trivia question: Considering all other regions (as defined by TM: states, provinces, countries), which region do you think has the most different .list files credited with at least one segment?

A second trivia question: How many regions do you think have no travelers so far?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on June 11, 2022, 03:19:07 am
Quote from: Jim on June 10, 2022, 11:34:08 pm
A second trivia question: How many regions do you think have no travelers so far?
Quite a few, but surprisingly less than you would think, given the number of 'remote' regions for our usual audience of US/European road geeks.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on June 11, 2022, 09:26:21 am
Quote from: Jim on June 10, 2022, 11:34:08 pm
The trivia question: Considering all other regions (as defined by TM: states, provinces, countries), which region do you think has the most different .list files credited with at least one segment?
for file in *traveled*; do printf "%03i $file\n" `head -n 2 $file | tail -n 1 | cut -f3 -d' '`; done | sort
Quote
...
238 IL-region-traveled.tmg
243 dc20-area-traveled.tmg
248 NY-region-traveled.tmg
254 MD-region-traveled.tmg
254 VA-region-traveled.tmg
256 PA-region-traveled.tmg
314 usai-system-traveled.tmg
314 usaus-system-traveled.tmg
315 USA-country-traveled.tmg
315 USA-national-traveled.tmg
316 NA-continent-traveled.tmg
339 tm-master-traveled.tmg

Quote from: Jim on June 10, 2022, 11:34:08 pm
A second trivia question: How many regions do you think have no travelers so far?
for file in *traveled*; do printf "%03i $file\n" `head -n 2 $file | tail -n 1 | cut -f3 -d' '`; done | grep -c ^000
Hopefully "Rockport to Warren, bypassing Rockland & Thomaston" isn't a spoiler to very many people. :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on June 11, 2022, 09:48:22 am
That's cheating!  Anyway, I was surprised at Pennsylvania edging out the others on the northeast metro corridor, and by how far down New Jersey ended up.  Here are all regions with at least 200 travelers. Only the US has 200+ travelers so nothing other than USA-country would top these.  The I-95 corridor is well-represented.

Code: [Select]
| PA-region-traveled.tmg       |       256 |
| MD-region-traveled.tmg       |       254 |
| VA-region-traveled.tmg       |       254 |
| NY-region-traveled.tmg       |       248 |
| FL-region-traveled.tmg       |       238 |
| IL-region-traveled.tmg       |       238 |
| NJ-region-traveled.tmg       |       232 |
| OH-region-traveled.tmg       |       232 |
| NC-region-traveled.tmg       |       231 |
| TN-region-traveled.tmg       |       231 |
| DC-region-traveled.tmg       |       223 |
| CA-region-traveled.tmg       |       219 |
| GA-region-traveled.tmg       |       218 |
| WV-region-traveled.tmg       |       217 |
| IN-region-traveled.tmg       |       215 |
| SC-region-traveled.tmg       |       211 |
| DE-region-traveled.tmg       |       209 |
| KY-region-traveled.tmg       |       207 |
| MA-region-traveled.tmg       |       206 |
| MO-region-traveled.tmg       |       203 |
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on June 17, 2022, 08:57:04 pm
16 regions...10 of which are on I-95.  And only 1 west of the Mississippi.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on June 18, 2022, 03:15:35 pm
Quote from: Jim on June 10, 2022, 11:34:08 pm
A second trivia question: How many regions do you think have no travelers so far?

Wild guess: 20 regions?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on June 18, 2022, 03:54:08 pm
Quote from: Jim on June 11, 2022, 09:48:22 am
That's cheating!  Anyway, I was surprised at Pennsylvania edging out the others on the northeast metro corridor, and by how far down New Jersey ended up.  Here are all regions with at least 200 travelers. Only the US has 200+ travelers so nothing other than USA-country would top these.  The I-95 corridor is well-represented.

I would expect DC to be higher since all you have to do to travel in DC is drive the Woodrow Wilson Bridge on I-95/495.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: mapmikey on June 18, 2022, 04:05:26 pm
Quote from: Markkos1992 on June 18, 2022, 03:54:08 pm
Quote from: Jim on June 11, 2022, 09:48:22 am
That's cheating!  Anyway, I was surprised at Pennsylvania edging out the others on the northeast metro corridor, and by how far down New Jersey ended up.  Here are all regions with at least 200 travelers. Only the US has 200+ travelers so nothing other than USA-country would top these.  The I-95 corridor is well-represented.

I would expect DC to be higher since all you have to do to travel in DC is drive the Woodrow Wilson Bridge on I-95/495.


There’s unsubstantiated rumors everyone uses I-81 instead….  :pan:
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on June 18, 2022, 04:35:06 pm
Here's the list of regions with no travelers.  China, India, and Mexico are well-represented.

Code: [Select]
| AFG-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| AGO-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| ALA-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| AUS-TAS-region-traveled.tmg  |         0 |
| BDI-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| BTN-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| CHN-AH-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-CQ-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-FJ-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-GS-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-GX-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-GZ-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-HB-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-HI-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-HL-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-HN-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-JL-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-JX-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-LN-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-NM-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-NX-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-QH-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-SC-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-SD-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-SX-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-TJ-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-XJ-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| CHN-XZ-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| COD-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| COG-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| COM-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| CRM-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| ESH-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| ESP-CE-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| ESP-ML-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| FRA-COR-region-traveled.tmg  |         0 |
| GAB-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| GNB-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| GUF-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| IND-AP-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-AS-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-BR-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-CT-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-DL-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-GJ-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-HR-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-JH-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-KA-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-ML-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-MN-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-MP-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-NL-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-OR-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-PB-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-RJ-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-TG-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-TN-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-UP-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-UT-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IND-WB-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| IRN-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| KWT-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| LAO-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| LKA-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| MEX-AGS-region-traveled.tmg  |         0 |
| MEX-CHIS-region-traveled.tmg |         0 |
| MEX-COAH-region-traveled.tmg |         0 |
| MEX-DGO-region-traveled.tmg  |         0 |
| MEX-NL-region-traveled.tmg   |         0 |
| MEX-SIN-region-traveled.tmg  |         0 |
| MEX-SLP-region-traveled.tmg  |         0 |
| MEX-TAM-region-traveled.tmg  |         0 |
| MEX-ZAC-region-traveled.tmg  |         0 |
| MNG-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| MP-region-traveled.tmg       |         0 |
| MWI-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| MYT-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| NCL-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| PAK-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| PRK-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| REU-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| RWA-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| SEN-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| STP-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| TJK-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| TKM-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| TUN-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| TZA-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| URY-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
| WLF-region-traveled.tmg      |         0 |
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on June 18, 2022, 04:46:51 pm
Quote from: Jim on June 18, 2022, 04:35:06 pm
Here's the list of regions with no travelers.  China, India, and Mexico are well-represented.

90 regions, thereof 52 in CHN, IND or MEX.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Bickendan on June 18, 2022, 11:41:21 pm
IND-WB's incorrect. I have mileage there.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on June 19, 2022, 08:09:32 am
Quote from: Bickendan on June 18, 2022, 11:41:21 pm
IND-WB's incorrect. I have mileage there.

I'm guessing your mileage there is in devel systems, which don't get into the stats.  If not, we'll have to investigate.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Bickendan on June 19, 2022, 02:40:06 pm
Quote from: Jim on June 19, 2022, 08:09:32 am
Quote from: Bickendan on June 18, 2022, 11:41:21 pm
IND-WB's incorrect. I have mileage there.

I'm guessing your mileage there is in devel systems, which don't get into the stats.  If not, we'll have to investigate.
I do have AH 1 mileage, but (not looking at my .list), it should be reported as the devel redraft and not the initial system in preview.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on June 19, 2022, 02:53:31 pm
Quote from: https://travelmapping.net/logs/users/bickendan.log
Ignoring line matching highway in system in development: IND-WB AH1 NH114 JesRd
Ignoring line matching highway in system in development: IND-WB NH19 NH114 NH12/16
Ignoring line matching highway in system in development: IND-WB NH12 NH16/19 JesRd
Ignoring line matching highway in system in development: IND-WB NH114 NH19 ColRd
Ignoring line matching highway in system in development: IND-WB NH116A BCRd KalRd
Ignoring line matching highway in system in development: IND-WB NH116A WB13_W KalLinkRd
Ignoring line matching highway in system in development: IND-WB WB13 ColRd NH116A_N
Ignoring line matching highway in system in development: IND-WB WB13 KalRd BCRd
Ignoring line matching highway in system in development: IND-WB WB13 NH19_W Ras-KucRd
Ignoring line matching highway in system in development: IND-WB WB13 TNMukRd NH19_S
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on June 19, 2022, 03:08:23 pm
Quote from: Bickendan on June 19, 2022, 02:40:06 pm
I do have AH 1 mileage, but (not looking at my .list), it should be reported as the devel redraft and not the initial system in preview.

Quote from: https://travelmapping.net/
These "devel" systems are not yet included in stats or plotted on user maps.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on July 21, 2022, 01:11:41 pm
I have been working with TM/METAL data and some of my programs that process it, and decided to run the "edge length distribution" on tm-master.tmg.  Lengths below in miles.  Note that is a "collapsed" graph, so these are distances between visible waypoints, taking into account any shaping points along the connection between them.

Code: [Select]
Edge length distribution (exponential):
0.0 <= len < 0.125: 19167
0.125 <= len < 0.25: 30330
0.25 <= len < 0.5: 65020
0.5 <= len < 1.0: 121695
1.0 <= len < 2.0: 166518
2.0 <= len < 4.0: 140926
4.0 <= len < 8.0: 78753
8.0 <= len < 16.0: 19516
16.0 <= len < 32.0: 3988
32.0 <= len < 64.0: 997
64.0 <= len < 128.0: 167
128.0 <= len < 256.0: 13

Here's the top 20:

Code: [Select]
G7@ToS312 to G7@S315 via G7 length 225.8419
N3/N17/N17F to N17/N17C via N17 length 215.5958
A17/AH62/E123@Syu to A17/AH62/E123@ImeKom via AH62,A17,E123 length 211.0824
NL510@MusFal to NL510/NL516 via NL510 length 169.9347
NL500/NL510 to NL500@JohnCabSt via NL500 length 167.8178
G4213@S207 to G4213/G4213Fan@HB/SN via G4213 length 162.4528
G7@ToS312 to G7@S213 via G7 length 157.4454
AH42@ChaRd to AH42@YiLoc via AH42 length 150.4283
G7@NM/GS to G7@S214 via G7 length 150.3914
AH32@BayNuur to AH32@A22_W via AH32 length 148.6031
AH42@Tan to AH42@S308 via AH42 length 142.8158
RTR30@Rito to RTR30@EN160/295 via RTR30 length 131.3696
E003@R180_W to E003@Min via E003 length 131.0283
RTR46@S439 to RTR10@N4_E&RTR46@N3 via RTR46 length 123.5412
RTR105@EN190&RTR20@EN190/260 to RTR202@EN260&RTR20@EN180/260 via RTR20 length 123.5229
C5@WolHill to C5@TwinHilVlg via C5 length 123.3106
C16/N1/SW to B1/N1/SW@RobRd via N1,SW length 122.5820
N5/N17|ESH to N14_S/N17_S via N17 length 118.9905
RN19@RR101 to RN19@End via RN19 length 117.7725
N83@NapSt to N83/QLD62 via N83 length 117.7152
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: webny99 on August 16, 2022, 03:40:45 pm
Inspired by some of the earlier discussion about what states have the most travelers, I made this map for the US and Canada:

(https://imgur.com/EJ2zblF.jpg)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on August 16, 2022, 04:12:43 pm
I believe that we can make a similar map in Mapview now for each specific segment (if your computer can handle all of the memory for each region in North America, etc.) via using Color by Traveler Count instead of Highway System Colors.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: andrepoiy on August 16, 2022, 05:02:17 pm
I'm surprised Wyoming has more travellers than Ontario... given that Wyoming's population is 500k and Ontario is 13 million
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: webny99 on August 16, 2022, 05:19:26 pm
Quote from: Markkos1992 on August 16, 2022, 04:12:43 pm
I believe that we can make a similar map in Mapview now for each specific segment (if your computer can handle all of the memory for each region in North America, etc.) via using Color by Traveler Count instead of Highway System Colors.

Yes, I have seen that page and it is a TON of data when trying to view a large area.



Quote from: andrepoiy on August 16, 2022, 05:02:17 pm
I'm surprised Wyoming has more travellers than Ontario... given that Wyoming's population is 500k and Ontario is 13 million

You'd probably also be surprised by how many US travelers have never been to Canada. Unlike Canada, much of the US population doesn't live near the border, so crossing it seems like a big deal.  ;)

North Dakota is the only lower-48 state with fewer travelers than Ontario, with 112 (Ontario has 144).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on August 16, 2022, 06:44:15 pm
Quote from: webny99 on August 16, 2022, 05:19:26 pm
Quote from: andrepoiy on August 16, 2022, 05:02:17 pm
I'm surprised Wyoming has more travellers than Ontario... given that Wyoming's population is 500k and Ontario is 13 million

You'd probably also be surprised by how many US travelers have never been to Canada. Unlike Canada, much of the US population doesn't live near the border, so crossing it seems like a big deal.  ;)

North Dakota is the only lower-48 state with fewer travelers than Ontario, with 112 (Ontario has 144).

I am one of them.  I never even have seen Canada until my recent visit to Niagara Falls on the US Side.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on August 16, 2022, 07:28:48 pm
Mapview in its current implementation is definitely not meant to be zoomed out too much.  If you do, be prepared to wait for the data to be pulled from the database, for that data to be transmitted to your browser, and for your browser to decipher it and plot it on the map.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on August 16, 2022, 09:02:18 pm
I've thought about CHM-style maps for heavy-duty applications like this.
But at least with where my coding knowledge is currently at, it's a steep hill to climb.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on August 17, 2022, 03:01:34 pm
Quote from: webny99 on August 16, 2022, 03:40:45 pm
Inspired by some of the earlier discussion about what states have the most travelers, I made this map for the US and Canada:

Great :)

Quote from: Markkos1992 on August 16, 2022, 04:12:43 pm
I believe that we can make a similar map in Mapview now for each specific segment (if your computer can handle all of the memory for each region in North America, etc.) via using Color by Traveler Count instead of Highway System Colors.

Sure, but it doesn't sum up per region.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Bickendan on August 18, 2022, 04:49:33 am
Amusing that Washington holds more TM tracking than Oregon.

Be awesome if a similar map for Europe could be generated.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on August 18, 2022, 10:37:08 am
Quote from: Bickendan on August 18, 2022, 04:49:33 am
Be awesome if a similar map for Europe could be generated.
The 'banana' is surprisingly dominant. I wasn't expecting it to be quite so.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: webny99 on August 18, 2022, 10:54:28 am
Quote from: si404 on August 18, 2022, 10:37:08 am
Quote from: Bickendan on August 18, 2022, 04:49:33 am
Be awesome if a similar map for Europe could be generated.
The 'banana' is surprisingly dominant. I wasn't expecting it to be quite so.

Nice! I guess I might as well post this one too seeing as I'd already made it, but I think I like yours better, broken down by region.    :D

(https://imgur.com/uoj0JA5.jpg)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on September 20, 2022, 12:39:06 pm
I just want to note that we are only 11 routes away from having 50,000 active routes, and 3,634 miles from 1.2 million active miles.
I think that either oscar with usaca or si404 with isrr+lsoa+gnbn+gabn activation will do the trick (hopefully soon) :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: oscar on September 20, 2022, 04:42:05 pm
Quote from: michih on September 20, 2022, 12:39:06 pm
I just want to note that we are only 11 routes away from having 50,000 active routes, and 3,634 miles from 1.2 million active miles.
I think that either oscar with usaca or si404 with isrr+lsoa+gnbn+gabn activation will do the trick (hopefully soon) :)

Looks like si404 beat me to the punch on one or both thresholds. I was going to hold off until the next system update, to make sure my latest pull requests (which Si has merged) made usaca ready for activation, before submitting my activation pull requests. That would also make sure my activation requests don't conflict with Si's.

usaca is a huge system, with 268 routes and about 11,000 miles. By itself it would easily exceed the above thresholds, even if Si's new systems somehow don't. 
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: andrepoiy on October 13, 2022, 12:40:18 pm
Quote from: webny99 on August 16, 2022, 05:19:26 pm
Quote from: andrepoiy on August 16, 2022, 05:02:17 pm
I'm surprised Wyoming has more travellers than Ontario... given that Wyoming's population is 500k and Ontario is 13 million

You'd probably also be surprised by how many US travelers have never been to Canada. Unlike Canada, much of the US population doesn't live near the border, so crossing it seems like a big deal.  ;)

North Dakota is the only lower-48 state with fewer travelers than Ontario, with 112 (Ontario has 144).

Yeah, but given that the Northeast+Midwest (which has a sizable number of the US population) is closer to the Windsor-Quebec corridor in Canada (which also has a majority of Canada's population) than to Wyoming, I thought that Canada would be a more likely destination than Wyoming
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: jayhawkco on October 13, 2022, 03:20:16 pm
Quote from: andrepoiy on October 13, 2022, 12:40:18 pm
Quote from: webny99 on August 16, 2022, 05:19:26 pm
Quote from: andrepoiy on August 16, 2022, 05:02:17 pm
I'm surprised Wyoming has more travellers than Ontario... given that Wyoming's population is 500k and Ontario is 13 million

You'd probably also be surprised by how many US travelers have never been to Canada. Unlike Canada, much of the US population doesn't live near the border, so crossing it seems like a big deal.  ;)

North Dakota is the only lower-48 state with fewer travelers than Ontario, with 112 (Ontario has 144).

Yeah, but given that the Northeast+Midwest (which has a sizable number of the US population) is closer to the Windsor-Quebec corridor in Canada (which also has a majority of Canada's population) than to Wyoming, I thought that Canada would be a more likely destination than Wyoming

Yeah, but then take into account the percentage of Americans without passports.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on October 26, 2022, 02:46:07 pm
We reached two milestones yesterday:
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Markkos1992 on December 08, 2022, 01:05:21 pm
Quote from: Markkos1992 on January 19, 2022, 07:54:41 pm
The most traveled segment in PA seems to be the I-95/US 322 concurrency (PA I-95 3 4) with 155 travelers. 

I was thinking that it would be somewhere on I-81, but I-70 has segments that are much closer (153 with I-76 between 146 and 161 with the entire I-70/I-76 concurrency being between 149 and 153 travelers, and then 149 travelers on the I-70/I-79 concurrency in Washington).

In VA, I am getting VA I-95 130 133, but all of I-95 between I-295 and I-495 seems to stay consistently above 170 travelers.

For PA, we have three segments of I-95 now tied for first at 166.    (PA I-95 3 4, PA I-95 9 10, and PA I-95 12 13)  It drops to 137 north of I-676.

In VA, first has moved south on I-95 to VA I-95 98 104 at 190 though every segment between I-295 and I-495 looks to be above 184.

In NJ, it is on I-95 between NJTP Exits 9 (NJ 18) and 10 (I-287/NJ 440) at 186.

Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on December 27, 2022, 01:05:47 am
Quote from: michih on May 01, 2022, 04:07:39 pm
Quote from: michih on December 22, 2021, 02:34:41 pm
Quote from: michih on July 18, 2021, 02:49:47 am
Quote from: michih on March 25, 2021, 01:58:06 am
Quote from: michih on October 25, 2020, 05:18:18 pm
We will have more than 60,000 routes in active+preview systems after the next site update.

We have more than 70,000 routes in active + preview systems now :)

We have more than 75,000 routes in active + preview systems now (75,222 routes for 1,555,070 miles).

We will have more than 80,000 routes in active + preview systems with the next site update.

We have more than 85,000 routes now (85,704 routes for 1,637,364 miles)

We have more than 90,000 routes now (90,314 routes for 1,671,624 miles)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on January 22, 2023, 01:28:15 pm
We have 500 active+preview systems now, thereof 353 active systems.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on February 06, 2023, 01:46:26 pm
39,543 out of 92,513 routes in active + preview systems (42.7%) are in France.

We have 96,386 routes in HB when devel systems are included. The 100,000 routes milestone is close.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on February 06, 2023, 01:54:36 pm
England is no longer the largest "TM region" in Europe.

European regions with more than 25,000 TM miles in active and preview systems:

Code: [Select]
33735.24   Nouvelle-Aquitaine (FRA-NAQ)
32900.48   England (ENG)
30109.55   Romania (ROU)
29851.13   Poland (POL)
28965.30   Occitanie (FRA-OCC)
28587.30   Auvergne-Rhone-Alpes (FRA-ARA)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: si404 on February 06, 2023, 03:12:13 pm
Quote from: michih on February 06, 2023, 01:54:36 pm
England is no longer the largest "TM region" in Europe.
Aquitaine is ours anyway, we just let the French pretend its theirs as long as they keep us supplied with claret...
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on February 06, 2023, 04:31:39 pm
What's the current status of Select count(*) from clinched;?

edit: 8109923 on lab2. Not the most recent repos there, but good enough for my purposes.
At 363 travelers, that's 22342 segments clinched per traveler.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: osu-lsu on February 06, 2023, 11:50:59 pm
Quote from: michih on February 06, 2023, 01:46:26 pm
39,543 out of 92,513 routes in active + preview systems (42.7%) are in France.

We have 96,386 routes in HB when devel systems are included. The 100,000 routes milestone is close.

Hurry up with Mississippi, Adam.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on February 07, 2023, 12:12:06 pm
Quote from: michih on February 06, 2023, 01:46:26 pm
39,543 out of 92,513 routes in active + preview systems (42.7%) are in France.

I was curious. Number of routes per continent in active + preview systems:

Code: [Select]
66,062  69.13%  EUR
23,175  24.25%  NA
 3,139   3.28%  ASI
 1,909   2.00%  OCE
 1,035   1.08%  AFR
   244   0.26%  SA
---------------------
95,564          total
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on February 24, 2023, 11:53:28 am
Quote from: michih on January 12, 2022, 12:58:41 pm
Quote from: michih on January 12, 2021, 09:24:09 am
We have more than 1.5 million miles in preview + active systems now: "66,328 routes for 1,500,132 miles" :)

We have more than 1.6 million miles now: "81,604 routes for 1,600,048 miles"

We have more than 1.7 million miles now: "93,937 routes for 1,700,123 miles"
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on March 13, 2023, 11:19:01 am
Top 10 travelers who've clinched the most active systems:

004 Ib3kii.log
004 charliezeb.log
004 froggie.log
005 drebbin37.log
006 duke87.log
006 vespertine.log
007 nezinscot.log
009 mapcat.log
011 oscar.log
017 michih.log

After work I'll have a go at adding preview systems into the total.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on March 13, 2023, 01:12:44 pm
Quote from: yakra on March 13, 2023, 11:19:01 am
017 michih.log

Love it :)

I also have five systems to be re-clinched....

What about clinched regions?
I have six only. No. 7 is at 99.28% since yesterday. Still almost 101 miles to go. Two roads are closed till the end of April, two roads till Mid 2023 and one road is closed till the end of the year (closed since April 2021).
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on March 13, 2023, 10:04:13 pm
Quote from: yakra on March 13, 2023, 11:19:01 am
After work I'll have a go at adding preview systems into the total.
Active+Preview results are the same.

Only cl94 & vdeane have clinched 1 preview system each.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: yakra on March 16, 2023, 09:46:33 pm
Quote from: michih on March 13, 2023, 01:12:44 pm
I also have five systems to be re-clinched....
2023-02-03;(Germany) Lower Saxony;A26;deuni.a026;Route extended at east end from exit 6 to exit 8 :( ;)

LOL I'm working from older commits on my local machines where you still have deua clinched.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on March 17, 2023, 01:42:16 pm
Quote from: yakra on March 16, 2023, 09:46:33 pm
LOL I'm working from older commits on my local machines where you still have deua clinched.

Yep, but I've also reclinched deubwl meanwhile. OTOH, I lost luxb this week when I added B31 which was dedicated as B route back in 2021 :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on September 21, 2023, 05:43:13 am
Quote from: michih on December 27, 2022, 01:05:47 am
Quote from: michih on May 01, 2022, 04:07:39 pm
Quote from: michih on December 22, 2021, 02:34:41 pm
Quote from: michih on July 18, 2021, 02:49:47 am
Quote from: michih on March 25, 2021, 01:58:06 am
Quote from: michih on October 25, 2020, 05:18:18 pm
We will have more than 60,000 routes in active+preview systems after the next site update.

We have more than 70,000 routes in active + preview systems now :)

We have more than 75,000 routes in active + preview systems now (75,222 routes for 1,555,070 miles).

We will have more than 80,000 routes in active + preview systems with the next site update.

We have more than 85,000 routes now (85,704 routes for 1,637,364 miles)

We have more than 90,000 routes now (90,314 routes for 1,671,624 miles)

95,074 routes for 1,759,640 miles now :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on November 07, 2023, 09:59:17 pm
I merged in the 9997th through 10,001st PRs to the UserData repository tonight.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on November 28, 2023, 03:47:29 pm
Quote from: michih on February 24, 2023, 11:53:28 am
Quote from: michih on January 12, 2022, 12:58:41 pm
Quote from: michih on January 12, 2021, 09:24:09 am
We have more than 1.5 million miles in preview + active systems now: "66,328 routes for 1,500,132 miles" :)

We have more than 1.6 million miles now: "81,604 routes for 1,600,048 miles"

We have more than 1.7 million miles now: "93,937 routes for 1,700,123 miles"

We have more than 1.8 million miles now: "95,962 routes for 1,802,184 miles"
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: Jim on December 01, 2023, 08:16:37 am
The "simple" format graph of all TM-plotted routes recently started to exceed 1,000,000 edges.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on January 06, 2024, 01:57:27 am
We have 100,051 routes in TM's database now - including devel systems.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on January 06, 2024, 02:36:33 am
Quote from: michih on January 06, 2024, 01:57:27 am
We have 100,051 routes in TM's database now - including devel systems.

I've only traveled 8,255 routes, i.e. 8.25%. I've clinched 4,314 routes, i.e. 4.31%.
I assume that @mapcat has most routes traveled: 12,756 traveled (12.74%), 9,867 clinched (9.86%)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on May 28, 2024, 12:44:06 pm
We do have more than 200 forks of the user repository (https://github.com/TravelMapping/UserData) now: 202. I don't know if anyone has more than one fork. I don't know how many users do actually submit their list files via Github. But 202 forks compared to 417 (actual or virtual) users (https://travelmapping.net/stat.php) is quite impressive :)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on August 05, 2024, 02:30:01 pm
Quote from: michih on September 21, 2023, 05:43:13 am
Quote from: michih on December 27, 2022, 01:05:47 am
Quote from: michih on May 01, 2022, 04:07:39 pm
Quote from: michih on December 22, 2021, 02:34:41 pm
Quote from: michih on July 18, 2021, 02:49:47 am
Quote from: michih on March 25, 2021, 01:58:06 am
Quote from: michih on October 25, 2020, 05:18:18 pm
We will have more than 60,000 routes in active+preview systems after the next site update.

We have more than 70,000 routes in active + preview systems now :)

We have more than 75,000 routes in active + preview systems now (75,222 routes for 1,555,070 miles).

We will have more than 80,000 routes in active + preview systems with the next site update.

We have more than 85,000 routes now (85,704 routes for 1,637,364 miles)

We have more than 90,000 routes now (90,314 routes for 1,671,624 miles)

95,074 routes for 1,759,640 miles now :)

More than 100,000 routes in active+preview systems now (100,025 routes for 1,892,127 miles)
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on August 26, 2024, 12:52:23 pm
Quote from: michih on November 28, 2023, 03:47:29 pm
Quote from: michih on February 24, 2023, 11:53:28 am
Quote from: michih on January 12, 2022, 12:58:41 pm
Quote from: michih on January 12, 2021, 09:24:09 am
We have more than 1.5 million miles in preview + active systems now: "66,328 routes for 1,500,132 miles" :)

We have more than 1.6 million miles now: "81,604 routes for 1,600,048 miles"

We have more than 1.7 million miles now: "93,937 routes for 1,700,123 miles"

We have more than 1.8 million miles now: "95,962 routes for 1,802,184 miles"

More than 1.9 million miles: "100,874 routes for 1,900,750 miles"

I don't expect that we might pass the 2-million-mile threashold in 2025. Maybe 2026?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on August 26, 2024, 12:56:17 pm
Quote from: yakra on March 13, 2023, 11:19:01 am
Top 10 travelers who've clinched the most active systems:

004 Ib3kii.log
004 charliezeb.log
004 froggie.log
005 drebbin37.log
006 duke87.log
006 vespertine.log
007 nezinscot.log
009 mapcat.log
011 oscar.log
017 michih.log

I have now clinched 26 active systems :)

I'd love to have Project-wide stats page (https://github.com/TravelMapping/Web/issues/452) on the site.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: froggie on August 27, 2024, 04:58:01 pm
I have 4...?
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on August 28, 2024, 01:37:43 pm
Quote from: froggie on August 27, 2024, 04:58:01 pm
I have 4...?

You have 3 but you had 4 in March 2023.
Title: Re: Project Statistics
Post by: michih on December 09, 2024, 11:19:41 am
Quote from: michih on August 05, 2024, 02:30:01 pm
Quote from: michih on September 21, 2023, 05:43:13 am
Quote from: michih on December 27, 2022, 01:05:47 am
Quote from: michih on May 01, 2022, 04:07:39 pm
Quote from: michih on December 22, 2021, 02:34:41 pm
Quote from: michih on July 18, 2021, 02:49:47 am
Quote from: michih on March 25, 2021, 01:58:06 am
Quote from: michih on October 25, 2020, 05:18:18 pm
We will have more than 60,000 routes in active+preview systems after the next site update.

We have more than 70,000 routes in active + preview systems now :)

We have more than 75,000 routes in active + preview systems now (75,222 routes for 1,555,070 miles).

We will have more than 80,000 routes in active + preview systems with the next site update.

We have more than 85,000 routes now (85,704 routes for 1,637,364 miles)

We have more than 90,000 routes now (90,314 routes for 1,671,624 miles)

95,074 routes for 1,759,640 miles now :)

More than 100,000 routes in active+preview systems now (100,025 routes for 1,892,127 miles)

105,364 routes for 1,941,631 miles in active + preview systems.