Travel Mapping

Highway Data Discussion => Updates to Highway Data => Topic started by: yakra on September 25, 2019, 06:24:12 pm

Title: MI points & labels
Post by: yakra on September 25, 2019, 06:24:12 pm
MI26:
US41Lau -> US41_Lau
US41_A -> US41_Pho for consistency? (unless you prefer A/B/C)

MI94:
+x90 & +x91 can be converted into visible (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.187763&lon=-86.427716) points (http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.149010&lon=-86.388929) while staying within tolerance, allowing travelers (http://travelmapping.net/hb/?units=miles&u=harvey&r=mi.mi094&lat=46.143723&lon=-86.367339&zoom=12) more visible options for use in their .lists files. ;)
Title: Re: MI points & labels
Post by: mapcat on September 25, 2019, 08:22:04 pm
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3182 (https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/3182)


I took care of M-26 and found a couple other adjustments to make (repositioning and renaming a point shared with US 41 and deleting a few unnecessary shaping points). Interesting that you didn't point out the US41_S & _N labels mixed in with the others, which I'm keeping for now.


As for M-94, there are a few other deserving visible points worth adding too. But the western part needs some point-drift-related TLC that I'm unable to provide for now, so I'll put all of this off until I have time to do a full system review. Ohio's comes first so there's no timetable for this yet.