Recent Posts

11

Updates to Highway Data / Re: CA: CA-24 exit number issues

« Last post by cl94 on Yesterday at 07:13:05 pm »

Checking Caltrans records, Oscar's comment for CA 237 applies here. As CA 24 is mostly old signs that predate exit numbers, I wouldn't be shocked if new signs include the numbers, and the numbers are official.

12

Updates to Highway Data / Re: CA CA139

« Last post by cl94 on Yesterday at 07:11:04 pm »

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8528

13

Updates to Highway Data / Re: CA: I-580 exit number issues

« Last post by cl94 on Yesterday at 07:10:56 pm »

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8528

Sorry about the delay here, unusually hectic few weeks.

14

Updates to Highway Data / Re: CA: CA-56 western ending in wrong place?

« Last post by cl94 on Yesterday at 07:00:38 pm »

So, the official west end of CA 56 as mileposted is where the NB ramp to the CA 56 freeway departs from the C/D road. This would imply that the end is 33A, and in a world where 33A/B are split, that's where the point should go.

The question now is if we keep it as two separate points or merge to 1. My preference here would be 2 points, but it may be worth holding off until we decide on a "standard" fix.

15

General Web Design Discussion / Re: Clinched Routes Highway Shields

« Last post by Jim on Yesterday at 06:55:23 pm »

Installing now on tmdevel.

16

Updates to Highway Data / Re: CA: CA-17 exit number issue

« Last post by cl94 on Yesterday at 06:46:57 pm »

See my comment on CA 237 exit numbers.

Agree with that justification here as well. Number stays.

17

Updates to Highway Data / Re: CA: CA-237 issues

« Last post by cl94 on Yesterday at 06:46:23 pm »

I'm with Oscar on this. If the number is official and Caltrans is slowly posting numbers as they get around to it, we can assume it'll eventually get posted.

18

General Web Design Discussion / Re: Clinched Routes Highway Shields

« Last post by cockroachking on Yesterday at 06:05:39 pm »

Batch 7:
 - usakyp: This post from Duke87 has me convinced that the Kentucky tourism logo on the bottom of the usakyp shields shouldn’t be an issue, so in they go.
 - cansf: Added shields for ON LinAlePkwy and ON RedHillPkwy (courtesy of mapcat), as well as my “homemade” version of BC GolEarsWay (thanks to MicroStation).
 - myse and mysjp: Added shields and code. I think I finally figured out how to add the font (LLM Narrow) to GitHub. Also updated the Sources/Credits to include this font.
 - svna, svnh, srba, hrva, biha, bgra, and rksr: Added shields and code. Used Mittelschrift instead of SNV font since it was close enough without worrying about another new font.
 - index: Added shields and code. Used the usasf template and changed the font to Transport Medium to match what India uses.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/Web/pull/853

19

Other Discussion / Re: Project Statistics

« Last post by Jim on Yesterday at 02:22:29 pm »

We passed the 60,000 milestone
We do now have 60,335 routes for 1,279,365 miles in active systems.

Pretty amazing.  At least one traveler has claimed travels on at least one segment of 37,605 of the 60,335 active routes.  I thought this number might go down quite a bit by omitting unranked travelers (like freeway.list, beltways.list), but not too much: 36,583.

Expanding to active+preview, we are at 106,807 routes (!!) and travels are claimed by a regular user on some segment of 41,834 of them.

20

Other Discussion / Re: Project Statistics

« Last post by michih on Yesterday at 01:59:07 pm »

I just want to note that we are only 11 routes away from having 50,000 active routes, and 3,634 miles from 1.2 million active miles.
I think that either oscar with usaca or si404 with isrr+lsoa+gnbn+gabn activation will do the trick (hopefully soon)

We passed the 60,000 milestone
We do now have 60,335 routes for 1,279,365 miles in active systems.