Author Topic: TX US82  (Read 7009 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:13:17 pm
TX US82
« on: December 02, 2016, 09:20:16 pm »
Incorrect waypoint name US62/385 - should this be US62/380? (Waypoint 11)
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AK: I; AZ: I; AR: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; HI: I; IL: I; IN: I*; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I; NE: I; NJ, I; ND: I; OH: I; OK: I; PA: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI;

*Previously completed

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: TX US82
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2016, 12:58:03 am »
This label appears to be correct. US82 is already concurrent with US380 as it enters the intersection from the west. US62 & US385 join up here, and then US380 leaves alone at the next waypoint, US380_E. US385 leaves alone at the next point (US385_N), and US62 stays concurrent for a long ways thereafter.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline SSOWorld

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 245
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:13:17 pm
Re: TX US82
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2016, 06:22:16 am »
I see.  Thanks.
Completed:
* Systems: DC, WI
* by US State: AK: I; AZ: I; AR: I; DE: I; DC: I, US, DC; HI: I; IL: I; IN: I*; IA: I, KS: I; MD: I, MA: I, MI: I; MN: I; MO: I; NE: I; NJ, I; ND: I; OH: I; OK: I; PA: I; RI: I; SD: I; WA: I; WV: I; WI: I,US,WI;

*Previously completed