FL 105 south end

[neroute2]

Why do we have SR 105 along what's marked as TO 105? Neither SLDs nor GIS data show it here.

[rickmastfan67]

Simple.  For so many years, FDOT had it posted along there to US-17, instead of over to I-95.

If you change the dates on the GSV imagery you linked to to Aug '19, you can clearly see a 'NORTH' banner above the FL-105 shield.

I also see that they removed the 'SOUTH' shield here in the 2023 imagery.

However, before I made any changes, I'd love conformation that this signage has changed as well, not directing people to the left to continue on FL-105.

Also would love to see them change this 'NORTH' shield to add a 'TO' as well along US-17, since that's the only way you can access NB FL-105.

[neroute2]

However, before I made any changes, I'd love conformation that this signage has changed as well, not directing people to the left to continue on FL-105.

It does seem to be gone, and I don't remember seeing it when I drove there last month. I definitely remember it still says to 17 left.

[yakra]

However, before I made any changes, I'd love conformation that this signage has changed as well, not directing people to the left to continue on FL-105.

It does seem to be gone, and I don't remember seeing it when I drove there last month. I definitely remember it still says to 17 left.

Yep. That looks like the same assembly dead center in the image, with 1 sign post instead of 2.

Also would love to see them change this 'NORTH' shield to add a 'TO' as well along US-17,

IMO this one is less convincing. DOTs will often fail to sign something with a TO when technichally it'd be more appropriate.

since that's the only way you can access NB FL-105.

This. There's no EB ramp so that movement is made via the surface road. Reminds me of US1, I-195 & ME5.
And TO isn't typically signed at ordinary ramps.

[rickmastfan67]

Now submitted.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7196

[neroute2]

Thanks