DEU-BY St2309
Rename St2441_E and W to N and S
DEU-BY St2441
Rename St2309_E and W to S and N
It's NE and SW. Leave as-is because all other intersecting routes of St2309 are also _W _E
DEU-BY St2315
Rename HaagGas to St2435_LaM and add St2435_LaM to HB (Neue Mainbrücke)
DEU-BY St2435
Another route, start point St2315, then over Neue Mainbrücke, and join actual route (rename WP NeueMainBru to St2437)
DEU-BY St2437
Rename St2435 to St2437WurStr and add St2437WurStr
I remember a 2017 news article in local media indicating that the ownership of the old and new River Main bridges might be changed soon. The "new" bridge was built in the 1970s...
It seems that the change is finally done. OSM is outdated, no need for St2435_LaM and St2437WurStr (which had be called St2435Loh and St2437Loh).
DEU-BY St2359
According to Baysis Start Point is B304, the short part between B15 and B304 seems to be part of the national road system.
I had this tiny piece of road (0.16mi) as B304AST in HB but that's just stupid. According to our rules, I should just had B15 and B304 wps with different coords and don't draft the AST.
When drafting deubyst, I've removed the AST shit and enlarged St2359 by these 0.16mi. I think it's a pragmatic solution for this issue. I'd like to leave as-is if there's no general objection.
B15 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.063289&lon=12.196944
B304 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.063443&lon=12.200253DEU-BY St2360
Rename St2092_E and W to S and N
The problem is that we have three St2092 wps and I already have St2092_N. Leave as-is. btw: WPT editor has a "root ct." column indicating the number of identical label names used (only different suffix)
DEU-BY St2395
Rename St2395_E and W to N and S
I guess you mean I should rename the St2181 label? It would really be logical but I have three St2181 waypoints.
I've renamed St2181_N --> St2181_W, St2181_E --> St2181_N and St2181_W to St2181_S
DEU-BY St2407
Rename B2_E and W to N and S
Both are NS routes... Leave as-is
DEU-BY St2412
Seems like it is interrupted in Petersaurach
The 2nd section of the bypass will be
built in 2019. That means, I need to reroute the Staatsstraße in late 2019 and the 1km gap will be closed anyway. Leave as-is now.
DEU-BY St2420
Rename B286_N to IndStr
BAYSIS was finally updated after the opening of Rüdenhausen bypass in October. St2420 and St2421 are concurrent to B286 bypass now.
DEU-BY St2563
Move WP St2070 to the roundabout intersection
due to the recent opening of Starnberg bypass, it's St2069 now
DEU-BY St2584
In baysis is not mapped inside Flughafen München
DEU-BY St2584AST
In baysis is not mapped inside Flughafen München
It was St2584 but it seems that it was downgraded. It's a private route owned by the Airport now. And the Airport is rebuilding it (2x2 widening and new alignment to the east:
project info and
dedication map from the plan approval documents which usually come into force with the opening of the road in Bavaria but there might be an exception because it's a private road now?).
Nevertheless, there's still a tiny piece in the west and short section in the east left.
I've truncated St2584 to the roundabout east of the Airport which is correct according to BAYSIS. Once the realigned Airport routes are completed (late 2020), it must be truncated to the ED5 interchange. I don't add the western segment to deubyst.
The western St2584 sections (St2584 and St2584AST) were eursf routes (active system!) before I've drafted deubyst system and I've added it again but as one route now. It must be modified once the realignment is completed but it can stay one route because the "Knoten Ost" (ED5 interchange) is just one WP.
It's not signed in the field, I call it "Zubringer Flughafen München" (
ZubFluMun).
DEU-BY St2622
Reposition St2126/2127
Nope. The position is correct at the overpass of the interchange. It might look odd when the bridge is far away from the other end of the ramps but it's perfect here.
