PA: PA 61 TRUCK (Sunbury)

[Markkos1992]

The truck routes here are two different one-way routes per direction.  The one for the SB direction (via Chestnut St and Wolverton St) is the only one in the HB.

Should I add the NB direction (via 5th St and Arch St) as a separate file, leave as-is, or even consider removing the route as the two directions on their own would be centered onto PA 61 proper?

[yakra]

Ugh. I don't envy you, having to deal with this. 
FWIW, PA147 already has a PA61Trk_N point.

[Markkos1992]

Ugh. I don't envy you, having to deal with this. 
FWIW, PA147 already has a PA61Trk_N point.

Personally, I prefer the two file approach.  Would PA61TrkSun_S (SB direction) and PA61TrkSun_N (NB direction) be usable for .list names though?

[yakra]

I prefer PA61TrkSSu & PA61TrkNSu, for "(South) Sunbury" & "(North) Sunbury".

[Markkos1992]

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2350

I did end PA61TrkNSu at PA 147 instead of sending it back down to PA 61 based on these shields in GSV.

Thankfully extending it down to the PA 61/PA 147 intersection is easily doable.

I am not yet marking this as solved in case there are objections.

EDIT:  Marking as solved as this is now in the HB.

[Markkos1992]

This is unrelated to the main topic of this thread, but I did not feel worthy of this being posted elsewhere.

Just noting that I just redid the labels on PA 147 for PA 61 in this area though it won't matter once the northern section of the CSVT is complete.

Also I fixed PA 61 through Mount Carmel.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2450

(Also Merry Christmas everyone in the mean time!!)

[vdeane]

Just noting that I just redid the labels on PA 147 for PA 61 in this area though it won't matter once the northern section of the CSVT is complete.

Just curious, how does this work, since the redone label seems to be the same as the alt labels?  Or is that multiplex detection at work?

[Markkos1992]

Just noting that I just redid the labels on PA 147 for PA 61 in this area though it won't matter once the northern section of the CSVT is complete.

Just curious, how does this work, since the redone label seems to be the same as the alt labels?  Or is that multiplex detection at work?

All I did was switch the PA61_S and PA61_N labels.  The PA 61/PA 147 wrong-way concurrency in Sunbury has PA 61 NB following PA 147 SB and vice versa.

I think you were at the CSVT meet in April, but I do not know if you traveled through Sunbury or not.

When the northern section of the CSVT is complete, PA 147 will be rerouted across the bridge to follow the current US 15 to the new freeway until the southern section is complete.  The PA 61/PA 147 wrong-way concurrency will be eliminated then, but there will still be a concurrency of the two routes on the bridge. (This map is for the final route designations when the entire project is complete, but it should be easy to notice the temporary routings after the northern section is open.)

[vdeane]

I did go through Sunbury on my drive home after the meet.  I'm guessing that my map still looks normal is because of concurrency detection on PA 61.

[Markkos1992]

I did go through Sunbury on my drive home after the meet.  I'm guessing that my map still looks normal is because of concurrency detection on PA 61.

After looking through at your list file, you would be correct.  Your line "PA PA61 PA147_N US11/15" covers that part of PA 147 despite your line "PA PA147 PA61_S I-80/180" only counting now for PA 147 north of the PA 61 concurrency.