usatx: Texas State Highways

[yakra]

Seeking public comment & peer review.
Prior discussion on AARoads

Outstanding issues in need of attention/discussion:
TX114BusRoa W terminus: I explained my reasoning in this post. It may still be worth some discussion though.
TX356: portion within Dallas City Limits recently removed from state highway system. Need to confirm cutoff point. (Elm Fork Trinity River?) Would like a link to minute order.
TX15: Si said "point at CR7?"; I don't know what he means by this.

[si404]

TX15: Si said "point at CR7?"; I don't know what he means by this.

Would you like to add a point at CR7 (in Stratford)?

[oscar]

Something I noticed in the field today:

TX 79:  US183 => US183/283 ?  (Both US routes are signed at that intersection.)

[yakra]

TX 79:  US183 => US183/283 ?  (Both US routes are signed at that intersection.)

Added to the HB some time ago.

Would you like to add a point at CR7 (in Stratford)?

SprSt added to a pending pull request.

TX356: portion within Dallas City Limits recently removed from state highway system. Need to confirm cutoff point. (Elm Fork Trinity River?) Would like a link to minute order.

No luck finding the minute order, but the grid map and Statewide Planning Map have been updated. Grabbing coords from the SPM, I get 32.808869,-96.903701. This is a wee bit east of the city limits, at the western edge of the Regal Row / Irving Boulevard interchange footprint; ramp merge/diverges, yadda yadda. It also looks to correspond to where the Elm Fork Trinity River bridge touches down on dry land.
What do y'all think is best for point placement & labeling? ElmForkRiv http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=32.808869&lon=-96.903701 ?

[yakra]

Submitted a pull request truncating TX356. I went with EFTriRiv @ the coords in my last post.

For a highway ending at a bridge and not at an intersection, End can be the label. If the bridge's name is official and signed, the name of the bridge can be used, truncated like a highway name. If there is no official bridge name but the bridge traverses only a river with an official name, use the river name.

When "Truncat[ing] like a highway name", I'm replacing the generic road type with a generic water-body type in this case.
With that...

This system is pretty much ready to go live. I'm confident that NE2's review on AARoads was a very thorough one. That said, it's still not undergone any systematic review from a CHM/TM veteran to get "standards" stuff such as waypoint labels, placement, etc.
Does it need one? It's my work, so of course I think it's fine!
If I don't hear anything by the end of May, I'll put in a pull request to activate.

[ua747sp]

Was entering some of my own travels and noticed that for TX105 the waypoint FM174 should be FM1774. Just wanted to bring this to your attention. Thanks!

[yakra]

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/588
Thanks for the fix!

[yakra]

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/606