« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: FL 112 and FL 953  (Read 3365 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ntallyn

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 337
  • Last Login:October 31, 2024, 08:04:24 pm
FL 112 and FL 953
« on: February 18, 2021, 09:50:31 pm »
FL 112 and FL 953 don't share any pavement, yet have separate points for FL953_N and FL953_S (on FL112), and FL112_S and FL112_N (on FL953)

I believe the FL953_S point on FL112 (and the matching FL112_S point on FL953) only covers a single movement (southbound FL 953 to westbound FL112 for airport access), and should be removed/hidden. Incidentally, FL112 is marked as E/W, so if the points are not combined, the FL112 points on FL953 should be renamed.
Logged

Online Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Today at 03:26:22 pm
Re: FL 112 and FL 953
« Reply #1 on: February 19, 2021, 11:37:51 am »
Minus the renaming of the FL 112 points on FL 953, I think the points are fine as-is.
Logged

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 05:19:58 am
Re: FL 112 and FL 953
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2021, 09:23:41 am »
0.5 miles apart, lots of partial interchanges in that area as well.  I honestly see no issues to how I did this.

Quote from: Markkos1992 on February 19, 2021, 11:37:51 am
Minus the renaming of the FL 112 points on FL 953, I think the points are fine as-is.

Yeah, I think I could rename them to _W & _E.

Fixed in my local copy.
Logged

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Today at 05:19:58 am
Re: FL 112 and FL 953
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2021, 05:39:17 am »
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »