That said, given the Atwood BS is signed as a loop, and acts like (most) of a loop, I don't see why it couldn't be treated in the browser as a loop (and one route with the Fort Morgan BL).
I could get behind combining them, with an AltRouteName.
I-76_W http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.254213&lon=-103.880796
CO52_N http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.254000&lon=-103.801575
CR24 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.253959&lon=-103.697248
CO71_N http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.255384&lon=-103.621802
CO71_S http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.259420&lon=-103.601171
US34_E http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.260632&lon=-103.595881
I-76_E +I-76 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.271668&lon=-103.584080
WestSt http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.321845&lon=-103.527431
EastSt http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.328912&lon=-103.517990
CR35.5 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.349586&lon=-103.483701
CR55 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.364171&lon=-103.439713
CRQ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.377446&lon=-103.427095
CR59 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.428819&lon=-103.381906
CR6 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.469429&lon=-103.374116
ColAve http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.482568&lon=-103.351607
CO63 +US6/63 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.544102&lon=-103.269596
6thAve http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.604960&lon=-103.219085Additionally, I-76_W & I-76_E could become AltLabels for I-76(75) & I-76(92), no longer being endpoints.
the_spui_ninja? Thoughts?
Ack I was busy last week and missed actually having to do something. I don't have a problem merging these routes into an incomplete loop (since I don't think they have a legal definition, they're just signage based). As far as the incomplete loops technically being a spur, if the signage says LOOP it's the DOT's fault not ours for being confusing.
