Author Topic: OH: International Gateway (Columbus)  (Read 4097 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline osu-lsu

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
  • Last Login:Today at 01:27:18 am
OH: International Gateway (Columbus)
« on: February 15, 2023, 11:51:34 am »
Well Dave...
If you're going to add Berea Freeway, what about International Gateway, in our backyards?
It is freeway standard from Cassidy Ave to Sawyer Rd (or whichever designation you want to use for the loopback between the rental lot & the terminal)
I think it gets just over the 1 mile threshold, if you start at Cassidy instead of I-670/US 62.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3304
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:12 pm
Re: OH: International Gateway (Columbus)
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2023, 12:13:58 pm »
The whole thought of counting Berea Freeway as clinched was debatable IMO, but I thought I got close enough on both sides of I-480 to count it.

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:05:00 pm
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: OH: International Gateway (Columbus)
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2023, 01:02:11 pm »
Well Dave...
If you're going to add Berea Freeway, what about International Gateway, in our backyards?
It is freeway standard from Cassidy Ave to Sawyer Rd (or whichever designation you want to use for the loopback between the rental lot & the terminal)
I think it gets just over the 1 mile threshold, if you start at Cassidy instead of I-670/US 62.

With this stretching just to get the length over 1 mile (which is much shorter than the typical usasf or cansf route), we seem to be getting far away from keeping U.S. Select Named Freeways a "select" system.

Offline osu-lsu

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
  • Last Login:Today at 01:27:18 am
Re: OH: International Gateway (Columbus)
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2023, 01:38:37 pm »
Well Dave...
If you're going to add Berea Freeway, what about International Gateway, in our backyards?
It is freeway standard from Cassidy Ave to Sawyer Rd (or whichever designation you want to use for the loopback between the rental lot & the terminal)
I think it gets just over the 1 mile threshold, if you start at Cassidy instead of I-670/US 62.

With this stretching just to get the length over 1 mile (which is much shorter than the typical usasf or cansf route), we seem to be getting far away from keeping U.S. Select Named Freeways a "select" system.

I expect Mapcat to shoot this down. But, I'll argue he set the precedence with adding Berea Fwy. (which I don't recall anyone asking to be added, just for the 3/4 mile between Oh 17 & I-71.  South of Oh 17, its already in the system as Oh 237)

Offline IMGoph

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 91
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 05, 2024, 11:03:41 am
Re: OH: International Gateway (Columbus)
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2023, 02:34:56 pm »
I was excited to see Berea Freeway added! It let me close a small gap in my network.

But we really should avoid adding more routes. There is only so much room on the Internet, and we must be close to running out of that room.

 8) 8) :o :o ;D ;D

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3304
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:12 pm
Re: OH: International Gateway (Columbus)
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2023, 02:35:40 pm »
Quote
I expect Mapcat to shoot this down. But, I'll argue he set the precedence with adding Berea Fwy. (which I don't recall anyone asking to be added, just for the 3/4 mile between Oh 17 & I-71.  South of Oh 17, its already in the system as Oh 237)

For the record, I do not remember asking for it or even thinking about asking for it.

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1769
  • Last Login:Today at 12:20:49 am
Re: OH: International Gateway (Columbus)
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2023, 08:29:18 am »
I added it when I reconfigured the OH 17/237 junction, which reminded me that it closed a gap in the I-71/I-480 interchange. I'm not certain that International Gateway serves a similar purpose. Granted, neither does the freeway to the Dayton airport, but it's longer.
Clinched:

Offline osu-lsu

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
  • Last Login:Today at 01:27:18 am
Re: OH: International Gateway (Columbus)
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2023, 05:28:24 pm »
I added it when I reconfigured the OH 17/237 junction, which reminded me that it closed a gap in the I-71/I-480 interchange. I'm not certain that International Gateway serves a similar purpose. Granted, neither does the freeway to the Dayton airport, but it's longer.

What purpose is it suppose to serve?
« Last Edit: February 16, 2023, 05:34:45 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1769
  • Last Login:Today at 12:20:49 am
Re: OH: International Gateway (Columbus)
« Reply #8 on: February 16, 2023, 07:16:06 pm »
https://travelmapping.net/devel/manual/sysdef.php#selectsys

There are routes with high importance to travelers which do not belong to any highway system. These are routes which are maintained by local authorities, are privately owned, or belong to systems which are extensive and not yet included to the project. Travel Mapping categorizes these routes to an own Travel Mapping highway system if possible. These systems are called Select because they cannot be considered being complete. We only include routes which the highway data manager of the region considers being relevant.
Clinched:

Offline bejacob

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 233
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:52:06 am
Re: OH: International Gateway (Columbus)
« Reply #9 on: February 16, 2023, 08:46:20 pm »
We've always given significant deference to whomever maintains a particular region as to what should be included and what should not. Mapcat decided to add the Berea Fwy and not to include International Gateway. He has given his reasons and since he maintains Ohio, that should be the end of the story.

I'm satisfied with his comments support his position