MI: I-96/I-696/M-5 Interchange and I-696/US 24/M-10 Interchange

[Markkos1992]

May I ask what the reasoning is for I-96 and I-696 not having a graph connection with M-5 at the 164 point on I-96?  I am in agreement at not showing I-96 and M-5 concurrent southeast of there even with the graph connection with M-5 at 165 with the north end of I-275 (which I believe is correct as-is).

I also think that I-696 should have graph connections with M-10 at 18C(10) and 17(10) with hidden shaping points to break the concurrency in between.  I am personally also not a fan of using M-10 exit number labels on I-696, but I am more in a fine with a no-build mood on that one.

[mapcat]

I'll look at it. My best recollection is that I had made some changes here shortly after assuming responsibility for Michigan and someone said "don't do it that way" so I followed their advice and redid it. Looks like making the graph connection and putting a hidden point on the segment of M-5 between the two exits would be a reasonable solution.