IN: I-69 Extension north to I-465

[Markkos1992]

Also the following needs to be clarified on opening day in August:

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2935005

1.  Signage along I-465
2.  Decommissioning of IN 37 along I-69 and I-465

[vdeane]

Also the following needs to be clarified on opening day in August:

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2935005

1.  Signage along I-465
2.  Decommissioning of IN 37 along I-69 and I-465

We got a report on the current state of signage along I-465.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?topic=4855.msg2936784#msg2936784

[Markkos1992]

Apparently it opens tomorrow:  https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2936983

[vdeane]

Apparently it opens tomorrow:  https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2936983

Well, southbound.  Northbound Friday or later.
https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2937165
https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/INDOT/bulletins/3acdf9b

[mapcat]

I found pics of most of the exits. I don't have time to wade through the entire AAroads post, so if someone can confirm that the new I-465 interchange is Exit 163 (barely visible in one of the photos there) I think I have everything I need to add the new segment. Also, what's happening with 37?

[mapcat]

Just got a call from INDOT with the needed exit number and the future of 37. https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7620

I-69 (Wheatonville) and I-69 Future (Indianapolis) are no more.

All routes with I-465 have been updated to include the new I-69 interchange.

Some .list problems will occur. Anyone who had been using the alternate waypoint labels "0" or "156" in their I-69 file will have inaccurate maps, since those labels are associated with exit numbers in the new file (inherited from I-69 (Wheatonville)).

[rickmastfan67]

A few 'errors' now show up on the datacheck page in reference to this.

Code: [Select]

in.in037 *MorSt VISIBLE_HIDDEN_COLOC in.i069@+X734056 in.in037;*MorSt;;;VISIBLE_HIDDEN_COLOC;in.i069@+X734056
in.in037 *WhiRd VISIBLE_HIDDEN_COLOC in.i069@+X589127 in.in037;*WhiRd;;;VISIBLE_HIDDEN_COLOC;in.i069@+X589127
Pretty much, those 'former' intersections are visible in IN-37's file, but not I-69's.  I honestly think they should be visible in both routes, especially due to all the other 'closed' points both north & south of that that are shown in both routes.

[mapcat]

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/7752

[yakra]

I coded up a CLOSED_OPEN_COLOC once upon a time, but stashed it without ever committing & pushing.
Should probably finish that off.

[Markkos1992]

So I guess IN 37 is unsigned along I-69 now.  (https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2946882)