Author Topic: Austria fixes (Read 697 times)

neroute2 · « **on:** April 20, 2025, 10:41:14 pm »

B145 interchange between A1 and L1263
B317 interchange (single offramp) between 29 and L62
B2 interchange (single offramp) between B38 and B34_S
B2 cannot be followed between B34_S and B4/B34. I understand the bypass east of B34_S needs to be mapped as B2, but it should probably be either split or overlap B34 with a spur east to B4_S.
B178 interchange between L272_UnkS and L272_UnkN

michih · « **Reply #1 on:** April 21, 2025, 01:33:03 pm »

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8318

Quote from: neroute2 on April 20, 2025, 10:41:14 pm

B2 cannot be followed between B34_S and B4/B34. I understand the bypass east of B34_S needs to be mapped as B2, but it should probably be either split or overlap B34 with a spur east to B4_S.

I don't see an issue. Keep as-is.

neroute2 · « **Reply #2 on:** April 21, 2025, 05:07:18 pm »

Quote from: michih on April 21, 2025, 01:33:03 pm

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8318

Quote from: neroute2 on April 20, 2025, 10:41:14 pm
B2 cannot be followed between B34_S and B4/B34. I understand the bypass east of B34_S needs to be mapped as B2, but it should probably be either split or overlap B34 with a spur east to B4_S.

I don't see an issue. Keep as-is.

Can I get more eyes on this? I'd think that a route should be followable from end to end.

neroute2 · « **Reply #3 on:** April 21, 2025, 06:58:45 pm »

More fixes:
B139 interchange between L1390a and RanStr
L1294-4 looks to be discontinuous
B180 interchange between L19 and L65_Tos
B189 interchange between B171_Ims and L246

michih · « **Reply #4 on:** April 22, 2025, 12:56:08 pm »

Quote from: neroute2 on April 21, 2025, 05:07:18 pm

Quote from: michih on April 21, 2025, 01:33:03 pm
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/8318

Quote from: neroute2 on April 20, 2025, 10:41:14 pm
B2 cannot be followed between B34_S and B4/B34. I understand the bypass east of B34_S needs to be mapped as B2, but it should probably be either split or overlap B34 with a spur east to B4_S.

I don't see an issue. Keep as-is.

Can I get more eyes on this? I'd think that a route should be followable from end to end.

I see no advantage if it would be "followable". I think it's fine as-is. We had B2 via B34 and a B2AST* but I've changed it two years ago.

*AST is kinda branch. I suggested the AST thing almost ten years ago. I widely used it in Germany and Austria. Si agreed on that. Then, I didn't like that German thing anymore. I tried to get rid off them. Mainly using a 'city' (or town/village) name instead. Or removed them if they were just ramps.