Author Topic: OR: Missing suffixes  (Read 495 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nagamasa

  • TM Collaborator
  • Jr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 60
  • Last Login:Today at 03:47:54 pm
OR: Missing suffixes
« on: April 24, 2025, 05:09:44 pm »

Offline Bickendan

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Last Login:May 05, 2025, 12:45:14 am
Re: OR: Missing suffixes
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2025, 01:08:15 am »
I'll need to verify with the ODOT GIS what's going on with 39; at some point it went from 39B to the third-leg-mainline of 39.
223 is not signed as a spur. It's a legitimate three-leg route https://maps.app.goo.gl/CqzywA4TXJWRZT4J8

There are only a handful of signed spur routes in Oregon (42S, 86S, and 104S), and as far as I can tell, only 42S is signed in the field.

Offline pderocco

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 49
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:51:38 pm
Re: OR: Missing suffixes
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2025, 02:59:09 am »
In GSV, it looks like 104S is shown on every street sign along it as Alt Hwy 101. Yet it wasn't in the original 2007 imagery. Was it actually Alt 101 in those days, but has since been demoted to a mere street name, only used by the Post Office?

Also, I just noticed that ODOT TransGIS shows the nearby end of 101B as being routed up Marlin Ave to the traffic light, instead of to the RIRO across from 104S, and GSV shows BUSINESS 101 signs at that light. So I think that's something that needs fixing in TM. (The other route seemed so illogical that I drove both last time I was there, just to be sure I had clinched it.)

Offline Bickendan

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Last Login:May 05, 2025, 12:45:14 am
Re: OR: Missing suffixes
« Reply #3 on: May 01, 2025, 09:46:34 pm »
I'm not sure why the Alt Hwy 101 street blades are there, but that's not a factor for 104S or 101B.
101B should be going up Marlin, as that's part of ORH 105 (as is the entirety of 101B). I'll deal with that in a bit.