Author Topic: LA 1174 endpoints  (Read 3479 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
LA 1174 endpoints
« on: February 27, 2021, 09:28:10 pm »
LA 1174 has no signed cardinal directions that I can see in GMSV. Add in how it's operationally a branch route off a wrong-way multiplex, and maybe that's where the LA29/95_A and LA29/95_B labels came from. But this doesn't meet the more than two points for the same non-exit-numbered cross road threshold. Shouldn't we treat it as a de facto E-W route, and label the endpoints accordingly?
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1767
  • Last Login:Today at 12:05:27 pm
Re: LA 1174 endpoints
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2021, 02:36:42 pm »
Clinched: