PA: PA 94, PA 116, and PA 194 in Hanover

[Markkos1992]

Well this situation makes Lancaster look easy.

From what I am seeing, I see PA 116 only following PA 194 NB in Hanover. 

PA 116 WB at PA 194 NB:  https://www.google.com/maps/@39.80068,-76.9812726,3a,75y,321.69h,65.59t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s-ArsHMtJnTtFblZOUZr-fQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
PA 116 WB at PA 94:  https://www.google.com/maps/@39.8003733,-76.9833732,3a,75y,224.62h,72.76t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sqGDpBmeeDATwTkq3h8VsUQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656  (this seems to be an erroneous 'TO" in my opinion, there is no indication that PA 116 WB traffic should turn onto PA 94 NB)
PA 116 WB leaving PA 194 NB (south end):  https://www.google.com/maps/@39.7992349,-76.9851628,3a,75y,249.97h,65.69t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sidRSTXZTL4qV5Vs_pqNnwg!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
There is even a PA 194 SB shield here, which I believe is just directly traffic to stay on Frederick St at this point.  PA 194 SB itself stays on Chestnut St until turning left at Forney Ave to reconnect with PA 194 NB. 

The only signs indicating PA 116 WB following PA 194 SB is on PA 94 NB and PA 194 SB at PA 94.

Therefore, below is what I am proposing.  This would break the PA 116/PA 194 concurrency but keep them lined up at the west end of the PA 116/PA 194 NB concurrency.  PA 194 is centered through the one-way section with no other points lined up with PA 116.  Otherwise PA 116 follows PA 194 NB (Frederick St) only.  This results also in a new PA 116 point for PA 94.

PA 194:
ForAve http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.796700&lon=-76.989768
PA116_W http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.799663&lon=-76.986075
PA94 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.801025&lon=-76.983902
PA116_E http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.801553&lon=-76.983119

PA 116:
PA194_S http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.799663&lon=-76.986075
PA94 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.800469&lon=-76.983277
PA194_N http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.800976&lon=-76.982459

PA 94:
PA116 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.800469&lon=-76.983277
PA194 +PA116/194 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.801025&lon=-76.983902

[yakra]

The only thing I'd do differently:
ForAve http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=39.795930&lon=-76.988601

[Markkos1992]

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/2490