FL 112 and FL 953

[ntallyn]

FL 112 and FL 953 don't share any pavement, yet have separate points for FL953_N and FL953_S (on FL112), and FL112_S and FL112_N (on FL953)

I believe the FL953_S point on FL112 (and the matching FL112_S point on FL953) only covers a single movement (southbound FL 953 to westbound FL112 for airport access), and should be removed/hidden. Incidentally, FL112 is marked as E/W, so if the points are not combined, the FL112 points on FL953 should be renamed.

[Markkos1992]

Minus the renaming of the FL 112 points on FL 953, I think the points are fine as-is.

[rickmastfan67]

0.5 miles apart, lots of partial interchanges in that area as well.  I honestly see no issues to how I did this.

Minus the renaming of the FL 112 points on FL 953, I think the points are fine as-is.

Yeah, I think I could rename them to _W & _E.

Fixed in my local copy.

[rickmastfan67]

Now submitted.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/4581