Author Topic: OH: Delaware Area Point Concerns (Not Related to US 23)  (Read 3256 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Today at 09:09:31 pm
OH: Delaware Area Point Concerns (Not Related to US 23)
« on: April 20, 2021, 05:25:15 pm »
Mainly related to this thread:  https://forum.travelmapping.net/index.php?topic=2790.0

US 36:
1.    OH37Tmp should be OH37Trk_W.
2.   OH521_W should be SanSt (Sandusky St).
3.   OH37 should be OH37_W.
4.   OH521_E should just be OH521. (also affects OH 37)
5.   Maybe add Africa Rd (AfrRd) for access to Alum Creek State Park. (also affects OH 37)
6.   The shaping point east of I-71 should be replaced with a visible point at Domigan Rd (DomRd). (also affects OH 37)

OH 37:
1.    OH37Alt should be TroyRd.
2.   OH37Alt/521 should be SanSt (Sandusky St).
3.   See 4-6 under US 36.
4.   CheSt should be CheSt_E.

US 42:
1.    US36 should be US36_E.
2.   The shaping point north of OH 37 should be replaced with a visible point at Horseshoe Rd (HorRd).

OH 37 TRUCK (Delaware):
1.   OH521_W should be SanSt (Sandusky St).
2.   US36_E should be US42_N.

Offline osu-lsu

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:59:48 pm
Re: OH: Delaware Area Point Concerns (Not Related to US 23)
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2021, 08:32:49 pm »
Where are you getting these descriptions from? Mapcat and I got these settled several years ago when ODOT/Delaware last changed the truck routing for Oh 37 through Delaware.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Today at 09:09:31 pm
Re: OH: Delaware Area Point Concerns (Not Related to US 23)
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2021, 08:37:49 pm »
Where are you getting these descriptions from? Mapcat and I got these settled several years ago when ODOT/Delaware last changed the truck routing for Oh 37 through Delaware.

I had thought that too, but these other edits resulting from that change must have been missed at that time.  Hence why I linked the previous thread.