Of course, soemone who drove the road, and not the frontage roads, wouldn't be able to mark anything given the precedent set on (most of) the rest of the site.
Maybe so, though I wouldn't begrudge anyone for
Androscoggin River Bicycle & Pedestrian Pathing it.
Has there been a change in the policy that routes where one is a frontage road to another aren't concurrent? Between this and US 31 in Birmingham, it seems there might have been.
No policy per se, though there's often a "break the concurrency if you choose to break the concurrency approach. So, no change.
Here, it should be noted that the SRT isn't even in the system, so there's no concurrency to break.
WRT US31, I read thru that topic a while back & gave it some thought, but never weighed in out loud. Got to be too much for my attention span; closed the browser tab. If it were me, I'd do things a bit differently there, but
how exactly,
wellll...Seems from froggie's last post in that thread that he's open to further suggestions on how to handle that area.
