NJ 31:
1. The SLDs indicate that StaGraRd should be OldCliRd (Old Clinton Rd).
2. Should the I-78 point be relocated farther to the west? (also affects US 22)
3. I think that MacKenRd should just be MacRd.
4. RivRd should be MusRivRd.
1. Deleted.
2. There's wiggle room IMO. Keeping as-is, NJ31's route trace S of I-78 stays more accurate.
3. Changed. This gave me indigestion when doing the Maritimes (Bob & Doug say hi). Realized a while back that
MacRd would be the way to go for these, and then if there's more than one to disambiguate, invoke the
choose 3 different letters rule.
The Maritimes could use a look-over.4. Changed.
NJ 33:
1. Is a graph connection at I-295 worth it?
2. Should CR539/571 be relocated to this intersection?
1. Nah.
2. Oh boy. Shapefiles &
SLDs confirm CR539 on Main St, with Ward St being a regular intersection. Makes sense for the NB route. SB has to use Ward to get around the one-way section of Main. There's a precedent for handling something like this in
MB Rte42. It involves moving the route-labeled point as you suggest, and keeping the entering one-way road with a street name. Just like with VT
23/
30/
125. Done.
NJ 71: 6thAve should be BriAve (Brinley Ave).
Changed.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5067