Bulgaria First and Second Class Roads (bgri)

[si404]

This system is ready for review

[michih]

I1:
Vid wp should be moved to the interchange; concurrent E79 too
+X02 is not required; concurrent E79 too
Montana bypass i/c are numbered on OSM
Montana bypass i/c wps should be moved a little bit; concurrent E79 too


I1bla:
II62_W wp should be moved to the north b/c it's no i/c
+X54 should be replaced by a nearby wp b/c there's an i/c
i/c @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.003937&lon=23.081948; concurrent E79 too
III1007 wp should be moved to the i/c overpass; concurrent E79 too
III1082 wp should be moved a little bit
i/c @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.505404&lon=23.275824; maybe last segment to A3?


I2:
III2001 wp is in the middle of nowhere; should be moved to the north; concurrent E70 too
A2/I4 should be renamed to A2 only


I3:
II35 and II34: I would move both wps to the underpasses; especially II34 wp location looks odd; concurrent E83 too


I4:
III305 wp should be moved a little bit to the east; concurrent E772 too
III401 wp should be moved a little bit to the east; concurrent E772 too
III307 wp should be moved a little bit to the west; concurrent E772 too
III4006 wp should be moved a little bit to the east; concurrent E772 too
III408 wp should be moved a little bit to the south; concurrent E772 too
A2/I2 should be renamed to A2 only


I5:
III501 should be moved a little bit to the east b/c it's not a full i/c; concurrent E85 too
+X01 is off the track and should be moved a little bit; concurrent E85 too
II52 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.759483&lon=25.903820; concurrent E85 too --> This II52 route segment is not drafted; it's signed at this junction though
I would move +X02 a little bit to the north... E85 too
+X07 should be moved to III5101 junction; E85 too
III5522 should be moved to the i/c; E85 too
III5004 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.908734&lon=25.353999; E85 too
III552 should be moved a little bit to the south; E85 too
+X29 should be moved to the northward curve; E85 too
+X36 should be a visible wp at III5005; E85 too
I6_E wp should be moved to the i/c overpass; concurrent I6 and E85 too
III663_W should be moved a little bit to the south; concurrent E85 too
+X42 could be a visible wp at the roundabout!? E85 too
UliTinaKir should be moved to the i/c underpass


I6:
UliGenKar wp should be moved a little bit to the east; concurrent E871 too
II64 wp should be moved to the center of the roundabout; concurrent E871 too
BulOsv wp should be moved to the center of the roundabout; concurrent E871 too
UliDem wp should be moved a little bit to the east; concurrent E871 too
II56_S wp should be moved a little bit to the west; concurrent E871 too
I5_S, see I5
III609 wp should be moved a little bit to the south
II73 wp should be moved a little bit to the west
Exceeds limits b/n II73 and III208
Exceeds limits b/n III208 and III6009
Ray wp should be removed


I6per:
III605 wp should be moved to the i/c underpass


I7:
Maybe wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.805993&lon=27.155296


I8:
A1_A is a strange wp label name
III803_N must be relocated (music w/o trumpets please)
I think +X727810 is not required
II82 should be moved to the south b/c it's not an i/c
Road is interrupted b/n A4_KapW and A5_KapE


I8sli:
Maybe wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.923922&lon=22.936642; concurrent E80 too
III811 wp should be moved to the i/c overpass


I9:
Exceeds limits b/n UliNis and BorYug
I would move +X15 to the northwards to the curve; concurrent E87 too
+X16 should be renamed to Rud; concurrent E87 too
+X37 is off the track; concurrent E87 too
+X43 is off the track and should be moved to the curve; concurrent E87 too
It seems that Malko Tarnowo might have a new bypass!?


I couldn't find any evidence that I8 is concurrent with A1 just east of Sofia but it's signed on II18; OSM also indicated the northern Sofia ring road I8/II18. Maybe both I8 segments could be merged?
Southern Sofia ring road is indicated I1/I6/I18 on OSM but I could only find II18.


There are some data check errors which should be checked:

Code: [Select]

bgr.ii021 X713647 LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN bgr.ii021;X713647;;;LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN;
bgr.ii035 X562861 LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN bgr.ii035;X562861;;;LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN;
bgr.ii035 X178366 LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN bgr.ii035;X178366;;;LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN;
bgr.ii035 X245662 LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN bgr.ii035;X245662;;;LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN;
bgr.ii035 X536959 LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN bgr.ii035;X536959;;;LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN;
bgr.ii062 ToIII6204,I1_N,+X342610 SHARP_ANGLE 156.73 bgr.ii062;ToIII6204;I1_N;+X342610;SHARP_ANGLE;156.73
bgr.ii063 iii6301 DUPLICATE_LABEL bgr.ii063;iii6301;;;DUPLICATE_LABEL;
bgr.ii079 X325186 LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN bgr.ii079;X325186;;;LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN;
bgr.ii082 X867362 LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN bgr.ii082;X867362;;;LABEL_LOOKS_HIDDEN;

Generally, I've randomly checked whether 3-/4-digit roads are signed on signage or km posts. Unfortunately, I couldn't find any evidence. However, I've no trouble with it.

[michih]

II18:
i/c @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.625994&lon=23.350893; concurrent E871 too
i/c @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.726776&lon=23.241384; concurrent E79 too
I8 wp should be moved a little bit; concurrent I8Sil, E79 and E80 too
i/c @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.745105&lon=23.255739; concurrent E79 and E80 too
+X42 should be moved and renamed to UlTop http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.801454&lon=23.370270; concurrent E79 and E80 too**
+X41 should be moved and renamed to Lok http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.770219&lon=23.438473; concurrent E79 and E80 too**

**IIRC, videos and pics posted on SSC show E79 and E80 signs on SST. I think it should be moved to that route.


II11:
II1102 should be renamed to III1102


II21:
X713647 wp should be renamed


II34:
I3/35 should be renamed to I3


II35:
X562861 wp should be renamed
X178366 wp should be renamed
X245662 wp should be renamed
X536959 wp should be renamed
7x 2 shaping points per curve b/n Bal and Kur


II37:
I would move the shaping points to the curves b/n III376 and VulaRodPoc


II53:
I would move +X522610 to the curve and add a new wp at the other curve
Exceeds limits b/n +X685750 and +X926787


II55:
I would move +X904180 westwards to the curve
2 shaping points for a curve b/n Gla and II76


II57:
I5/66 should be renamed to I5 (or I5/II66?)


II58:
I would relocate the shaping points b/n Nov and Yon
+X864761 should be moved to the curve


II59:
I would relocate the shaping points b/n III5901 and III5902


II71:
I would move +X875715 eastwards to the curve


II73:
I would relocate the shaping points b/n III7304 and Pri, for instance removing the 2nd point of the curve with 2 points


II76:
Exceeds limits b/n Sak and III559_W


II79:
X325186 wp should be renamed


II81:
I would relocate shaping points to the curves b/n III813 and III812


II82:
X867362 wp should be renamed
2 shaping poits at a curve b/n Bor and Rad


II84
Exceeds limits b/n III8404 and +X380511
I would move shaping points to the curves b/n III843 and SvePet

[si404]

I believe all the above is in the browser, will be activating later in the week unless anyone objects

[michih]

Except one data check error. I think Kon wp could be added to II63.

[michih]

Concurrency issue. II18 wp of E80 should be moved