Author Topic: NC: NC 160 (and NC 49) Point Concerns  (Read 4079 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Today at 07:25:05 pm
NC: NC 160 (and NC 49) Point Concerns
« on: August 03, 2021, 05:40:58 pm »
It looks like DixRd is not applicable on NC 160 because there seems to have been a realignment here at some point.

Also BilGraPky should be changed to BilGraPkwy on both NC 160 and NC 49.

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1227
  • Last Login:Today at 04:45:34 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: NC: NC 160 (and NC 49) Point Concerns
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2021, 07:05:35 pm »
Looks like about 2011 on the realignment...

Fixes made and in the queue

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Today at 07:25:05 pm
Re: NC: NC 160 (and NC 49) Point Concerns
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2021, 08:07:01 am »
I think an updates entry should have been made for the realignment of NC 160 between ByrDr and YorRd.

Also I did not catch these for NC 160 earlier:

I-485(4)>-I-485
I-77(9A)>-I-77

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1227
  • Last Login:Today at 04:45:34 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: NC: NC 160 (and NC 49) Point Concerns
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2021, 04:43:58 pm »
additional changes made

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Today at 07:25:05 pm
Re: NC: NC 160 (and NC 49) Point Concerns
« Reply #4 on: September 27, 2021, 11:55:17 am »
I saw the updates entry, but I did not see the updates to the NC 160 file.

Offline mapmikey

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1227
  • Last Login:Today at 04:45:34 pm
    • Co-curator Virginia Highways Project
Re: NC: NC 160 (and NC 49) Point Concerns
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2021, 04:14:33 pm »
additional changes made