Author Topic: AZ: US 89, US 180, AZ 64, and AZ 89 Point Concerns  (Read 3023 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Today at 07:09:34 am
AZ: US 89, US 180, AZ 64, and AZ 89 Point Concerns
« on: December 03, 2021, 01:44:50 pm »
I-40 BL (Flagstaff)/US 66 Historic (Flagstaff)/US 180: 
1.  US89_N should be US89.
2.  SanFeAve should be US66His_E.  (US 180 only)
3.  4thSt_Fla should be 4thSt.  (US 66 Historic only)
4.  EntRd should be PonPkwy (Ponderosa Pkwy).

US 89:
1.  I recommend replacing FR414 with BraWay (Brandis Way).
2.  Should the FR545 points be renamed to follow the usanp route?
3.  FR418 should be BroRd (Broadmore Rd).
4.  Uncertain Label: GovTankRd

AZ 64:
1.  Maybe replace the first shaping point north of I-40 with a visible point.
2.  Uncertain Labels:  FireRd736, PipRd, WilCouRd (also affects US 180), CocRimRd, DesViewRd, FireRd682, GrayMtnTr, BIA6140
3.  I would change ERimDr to SouEntRd_N.

AZ 89:
1.  EscWay needs to be relocated to the north.
2.  AZ71, WalBlvd,  should be slightly relocated.
3.  KirRd should be KirValRd (Kirkland Valley Rd).
4.  PonParkRd should be PonRd.
5.  HidValDr should be HidValRd.
6.  3rdSt_N should be MonSt_N.
7.  A point should be added at Prescott Lakes Pkwy (PreLakPkwy) due to its connection to AZ 69.  (This might replace the shaping point to the north if Willow Lake Rd does not.)
8.  Uncertain Labels: FR9013, FR30
« Last Edit: December 03, 2021, 03:48:32 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline Duke87

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1018
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 08:57:54 pm
Re: AZ: US 89, US 180, AZ 64, and AZ 89 Point Concerns
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2021, 09:47:23 pm »
Do want to note regarding HidValRd vs. HidValDr that the street sign at the other end of the road says it's correct as is.

And as far as all these uncertain labels go, they match what OSM shows, so in the absence of any street signs visible to the contrary that's as good as we get. The names of very minor rural dirt roads are just not that tidily kept track of.

Addressed otherwise.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Today at 07:09:34 am
Re: AZ: US 89, US 180, AZ 64, and AZ 89 Point Concerns
« Reply #2 on: December 04, 2021, 02:12:46 am »
Do want to note regarding HidValRd vs. HidValDr that the street sign at the other end of the road says it's correct as is.

And as far as all these uncertain labels go, they match what OSM shows, so in the absence of any street signs visible to the contrary that's as good as we get. The names of very minor rural dirt roads are just not that tidily kept track of.

I actually saw something similar with SilSadRd in Flagstaff on US 89 so I am unsure what is going on...

Quote
And as far as all these uncertain labels go, they match what OSM shows, so in the absence of any street signs visible to the contrary that's as good as we get. The names of very minor rural dirt roads are just not that tidily kept track of.

Yeah, I am fine with a no-build on these.  I was trying to match with the AZ State Map online that I have linked to elsewhere as much as possible on this.

US 66 Historic (Flagstaff):  Somehow I did not catch US89_N.  I guess I would go US180_E or I-40BL_E, but I-40BL/180 may be acceptable too.
« Last Edit: December 04, 2021, 02:15:03 am by Markkos1992 »