I mean technically S-393 is in Butte city limits because of the city-county consolidation, and it's still well signed. There's also no "C000375A" route ID anymore (e.g. in Belgrade the rerouted section of 290 has a Route ID of C000290A and a department ID of U-603A, the department ID varies but the Route ID stays the same). Moreover, while the southern end is still signed, the northern end has no signage whatsoever, and apparently might have even been in downtown Butte (which is where the route "C001807A" ends, incidentally). It's the uncertainty at the northern end that bothers me, since unlike the unsigned portions of MT 2, there's alternative routes someone could take if they weren't looking at the HB beforehand.