NC I-42

[si404]

Also, on US-70's file, the labels along this 'segment' of I-42 should be the '4(42)' style, due to US-70 having it's own numbers there too.

Surely (mostly) moot as the change that needs to happen on US70 is moving it off of 42 rather than relabelling exits that aren't on the road.

[mapmikey]

US 70 rerouted back to old routing in TM.

[Markkos1992]

Is there a reason why we have not deleted US70BypGol yet?

So we do have a huge problem.  Looking through the update on Github, US70BusGol was inadvertently deleted instead of US70BypGol.

Secondarily in big issues in VA, VA 375 has its own VA375 label that should be VA3.

[Jim]

So we do have a huge problem.  Looking through the update on Github, US70BusGol was inadvertently deleted instead of US70BypGol.

Not a huge problem.  I noticed and fixed it last night (I believe).

[Markkos1992]

So we do have a huge problem.  Looking through the update on Github, US70BusGol was inadvertently deleted instead of US70BypGol.

Not a huge problem.  I noticed and fixed it last night (I believe).

Yeah you had fixed it.

[Markkos1992]

So, the 'main' file of I-42 already needs exit number fixes sadly.

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2973062

2 -> 4
5 -> 7

This means, that what we currently have as '8' probably is really '10', but no pictures of that one yet.

Also, on US-70's file, the labels along this 'segment' of I-42 should be the '4(42)' style, due to US-70 having it's own numbers there too.

You guessed correctly.  It is 10 (see 7:15).

[rickmastfan67]

So, the 'main' file of I-42 already needs exit number fixes sadly.

https://www.aaroads.com/forum/index.php?msg=2973062

2 -> 4
5 -> 7

This means, that what we currently have as '8' probably is really '10', but no pictures of that one yet.

Also, on US-70's file, the labels along this 'segment' of I-42 should be the '4(42)' style, due to US-70 having it's own numbers there too.

You guessed correctly.  It is 10 (see 7:15).

 

So, as soon as we finally get the I-42 exit numbers fixed (this includes fixing them in NC-36's file too, as well as US-70's 'I-42(8 )' label to "10(42)"), we can mark this thread as solved I think.