As well, I believe only about half of the system is only mapped (which is already the size of usai)
It's already 19% longer than usai, almost 60,000 miles.
Mostly missing exit numbers, there's a lot of in the middle of nowhere.
Naming all the exits G123_Que knowing there's a "final form" that would require scrubbing a route again is not fun :/
Not G123_Que but Que only. Sure, it's annoying but it might take years or decades till everything will be updated on OSM. Who knows.
We do currently only have 10 travelers. You are no. 1 with just 0.32% traveled. Thus, I see no urgency to enable travelers getting update entries in case of future changes.
However, I think that it would ease the review process to clearly see what's done.
We might have two systems:
-
chng China National Expressways-
chngi China National Expressways (incomplete)Similar to what si404 did with asiah by having an additional asiaho system for outlined routes - in devel status though. I think that si4040 also had a "review" system in the past.
Any strong feeling against that approach from anyone else?
