If you have any trouble registering for the forum, please email travmap@teresco.org for help. Email systems often block activation emails sent by the forum.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
If we've gone thru the trouble of having two separate points for I-64 & I-95 inside of I-195's file, shouldn't we have said 'I-95' point in I-95's file (as '79A') to allow a graph connection between the two routes?