« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: WA 100  (Read 9284 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bickendan

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 553
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:47:18 pm
WA 100
« on: November 07, 2016, 01:49:10 am »
Just clinched WA 100 tonight.
There are two segments, both bannered: The segment we have in the browser is signed as SR 100 Loop (no directional banners), and a short SR 100 Spur from the southern most point to Fort Canby. That point, BeaHolSP, needs to renamed to WA100Spur and the BeaHolSP tag hidden to prevent any .list breaks.
WA 100 Spur Ilwaco needs to be added to the system.
To reiterate:
WA100 -> WA100Loop Ilwaco
BeaHolSP -> WA100Spur +BeaHolSP
Create: WA100Spur Ilwaco, points at WA100Loop and FtCan
Logged

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1767
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:47:09 pm
Re: WA 100
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2016, 10:32:04 am »
Nobody is currently responsible for Washington, so go for it.
Logged
Clinched:

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: WA 100
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2016, 02:03:26 pm »
What to use in the CSV banner field for "loop"?
Logged
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:42:37 pm
Re: WA 100
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2016, 04:03:44 pm »
Quote from: yakra on November 07, 2016, 02:03:26 pm
What to use in the CSV banner field for "loop"?

Looks like this would be the first example, so I guess it's time to pick something.  I can verify that the DB field is 3 characters, so I'd say "Lp" makes the most sense.  Better than "Loo" or "Lop".
Logged

Offline dfilpus

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 153
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 01:29:11 pm
    • Filpus Roadgeek
Re: WA 100
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2016, 04:45:17 pm »
The last time I checked WA 100 Spur was not signed. It is signed now, so it should be added. WA 100 Loop is signed as vanilla WA 100 at US 101. Its reassurance signs have Loop banners. I would leave wa100.wpt as is and add wa100sprfor.wpt for WA 100 Spur Fort Canby.
Logged

Offline mapcat

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1767
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:47:09 pm
Re: WA 100
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2016, 07:05:17 pm »
Regardless of how WA 100 is signed, it would still be good to have a "Loop" banner, especially for usaga. Unless we want to do special templates for the usaga loops, since I believe most are signed with "Loop" inside the Georgia outline.
Logged
Clinched:

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: WA 100
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2016, 11:18:12 pm »
Quote from: Jim on November 07, 2016, 04:03:44 pm
Looks like this would be the first example, so I guess it's time to pick something.  I can verify that the DB field is 3 characters, so I'd say "Lp" makes the most sense.  Better than "Loo" or "Lop".
At least the second example, actually:
usaok;OK;OK56;Lp;Okm;Okmulgee;ok.ok056lpokm;
So that precedent being set, along with the same "Lp" abbreviation being used throughout Texas, I second "Lp."

Quote from: mapcat on November 07, 2016, 07:05:17 pm
Regardless of how WA 100 is signed, it would still be good to have a "Loop" banner, especially for usaga. Unless we want to do special templates for the usaga loops, since I believe most are signed with "Loop" inside the Georgia outline.
I also think having a Loop banner is a good idea; more of these could show up. CHM has a Loop banner in use for the above route: cmap.m-plex.com/hb/hwymap.php?r=ok.ok056lpokm
I'll stay officially neutral re special shield templates.
Logged
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline compdude787

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 08, 2024, 12:26:51 pm
Re: WA 100
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2016, 03:32:30 pm »
Quote from: mapcat on November 07, 2016, 10:32:04 am
Nobody is currently responsible for Washington, so go for it.

As I've mentioned previously, I'd be more than happy to take over maintenance for WA.
Logged

Offline compdude787

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 08, 2024, 12:26:51 pm
Re: WA 100
« Reply #8 on: December 17, 2016, 01:21:03 am »
Finally did a pull request for this: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/1009
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »