What will happen to the Select Numbered State Freeways system?

[theFXexpert]

And good https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/1100

[michih]

Moving from "In-progress Highway Systems & Work" to "other discussion" board since it is not a "highway systems that is currently in progress and hasn't been activated yet."

http://travelmapping.net/hb/index.php?sys=usansf still encompasses routes in AL, AR, GA, LA, MS, PR and SC.

[oscar]

^ Only one route (MS 67) isn't in a jurisdiction with a preview system for its numbered routes.

We could remove the other routes from usansf, and leave MS 67. Or, as we did with Saskatchewan for the former counterpart Canadian system, create a new in-dev usams system to park MS 67, and kill usansf. But, IIRC, the former Canadian system wasn't an active system like usansf, so the elimination of the Canadian system didn't move any routes out of active status.

[froggie]

Alabama's NSF routes (and I presume GA, LA, and SC as well) will go away as those systems are activated.

I'm fine with creating a USAMS in-development system to park MS 67 for now.  I don't intend to really start work on Mississippi until Alabama is activated.

[michih]

I think that we've agreed on keeping the routes in an active system. A dummy devel system would not help to eliminate usansf system now.

[mapcat]

This really isn't a problem that needs solving right now. I'd prefer to leave usansf alone until its routes disappear with the activation of other systems.

[yakra]

This really isn't a problem that needs solving right now. I'd prefer to leave usansf alone until its routes disappear with the activation of other systems.

Agreed.
Let's keep MS67 in an active system.

[michih]

Only 12 routes are left: AL152, AL158, AL255, AL759, AR151, AR440, LA3132, MS67, PR30, PR53, PR53 (Guayama) and PR66.