One notable example, which caused some heartburn, was the short numbered English highway (A344?) that used to take you to a parking lot very close to Stonehenge.
A344 yes. It didn't cause
me heartburn to remove it here (even with the debate about whether the still-driveable stub was still A344 making my life harder), though the fact that after thousands of years, the fork in the road at Stonehenge ceased to exist did annoy me.
I left a starred point on the A303 for the former junction, and the other end (A360) was a four-way junction, so it just got renamed after the B road arm with an A344 alt-label.
As has been said, former sections of US routes that are signed with Historic US signs are drafted for future addition to the site, and many roads - in the US in particular - have the old road as a bannered route or a state route, or something mapped here.
I just want to know, if an alignment that I traveled on ceases to exist, and the highway gets re-routed, that the special route doesn't get added to my list. Also, since I didn't travel on the new alignment, so I don't want that to be on my list, either.
If you have travelled along a highway in 'Alanland' - lets call it A123, between the M456 in Ashville and the B789 in Canton, including through Bridgehampton, and Bridgehampton gets bypassed and the bypass is part of the A123, with the old route numbered something else then
AN A123 M456 B789
in your .list file would now show you taking the bypass as that is the route of A123 between those two points. However, on the
updates page, and entry will have been added along the lines of:
2000-01-01 Alanland A123 an.a123 Route removed from Goat Track (now A1230) and relocated onto Bridgehampton Bypass between A1230_N and A1230_S
2000-01-01 Alanland A1230 an.a1230 New Route
so, if you want your .list file to accurately map your travels, then you can see the update and change it to be:
AN A123 M456 A1230_N
AN A123 A1230_S B789
AN A1230 A123_N A123_S