Lithuania Krašto Keliai (ltuk)

[michih]

System is ready for review.

http://tm.teresco.org/hb/index.php?sys=ltuk

Sources and notes: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/hwy_data/LTU/ltuk/README.md

Any feedback is welcomed.

[si404]

200s:

K202 - continues north
K219 - Pik -> R2703?

[si404]

150+

K153 - R1624 -> R1614 or R1627
K161 - continues south of A11
K164 - ZemGat -> ZemGat_W
K180 - R5007 -> R5006? (it seems the more major road)
K183 - PDovGat -> R2602?
K188 - LLekGat -> R1822
K189 - R3606 -> R3306

[si404]

100-150

A20 - what happened to this route? This commit removed it, but there was no updates.csv entry.
K101 - R5223_N and R2225_S -> drop suffixes
K119 - KjiGat -> R2813
K129 - R1193 -> R1133
K145 - R2001 needs moving; GerGat is A20
K174 - UkmSiaApl is A20

[yakra]

A20 - what happened to this route? This commit removed it, but there was no updates.csv entry.

I would write that off to the system being in preview status, thus no updates entry being required.

[michih]

A20 - what happened to this route? This commit removed it, but there was no updates.csv entry.

I would write that off to the system being in preview status, thus no updates entry being required.

I have to look into it why I've removed A20 but yakra is wrong, A20 is not part of ltuk but ltua system which is active. I guess A20 had no used waypoint and I've omit the update entry. Is it OK or do I always have to enter a notification? Sure, adding a new route must be notified. But removing an unused route?

[michih]

A20 - what happened to this route?

I wrote you a PM a year ago:

2. Do you remember why you've routed via the bypass?

When it opened, I presumed the E262 would take the bypass. At a later point I synced the A6 to the E262, forgetting this bypass.

4. It seems that no A6, A20 or E262 waypoints are in use at all. I guess it's not necessary to mention changes like this in our update list?

As it's an error, I'm going to say we can get away with it.

I've removed the route and added a note: https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/blob/master/hwy_data/LTU/ltua/README.md

[michih]

A20 is indicated on OSM but not on GM/GSV. GSV is from 2012 (all over Lithuania).
According to wegenwiki, the bypass was built by the municipality but rededicated to A20 in 2014. I'll go with OSM and add the route.

According to wegenwiki, wikipedia and OSM, there is also an A21 at the border to Russia. The construction of the bypass was started in 2014 and it's (not yet) indicated on GM/GSV. It was completed in August 2015 but not yet opened because the Russian section is not yet completed. Not adding.

K202 - continues north

The only sign I found is this one on 2012 GSV at the current end. I guess it was rededicated or just signed after 2012. wikipedia also indicated that it ends at Kirtimai and has a length of 27km. I'll extend it.

K219 - Pik -> R2703?

I couldn't find R2703 on OSM/GM/GSV. What's your source?

Edit:

K145 - R2001 needs moving

Really? All streets are one-way streets.

[si404]

Fair enough on the A20 - I did presume/half recall you removed it due to lack of signage on GMSV - it was more the lack of update entry that concerned me.

Not including the A21 makes sense. Oddly OSM shows the Russian part as open, save for the bridge at the border, and a small stretch just north of the first junction. The whole Latvian road is marked as closed. I think it's the border control area that is what needs to open for the road to.

My source for the R2703 is OSM. OSM shows the junction of the two roads further west than you have the point, but it very much is there. HERE mapping shows it at the junction you have as the end point.

K145 - that only one side of the loop is coloured on OSM threw me, the point is fine.