usapr: Puerto Rico Territorial Highways

[Markkos1992]

PR 153:  I presume that the breaking of the graph connection with PR 1 was done purposely.  (EDIT:clarifying to note that I believed this due to the odd-setup of the area)

That is the only comment I have at this time.

[Markkos1992]

PR 355:  Does this route not extend to PR119?

For this one, the label for the extension to PR119 was accidentally put in as PR355.  (Magically making a route ends at itself, how can I learn that trick?      I hope this lightens the load instead of coming off snarky.  Happy New Year!!)

[mapcat]

Thanks.

[mapcat]

Responses to review through PR 500:

PR 123:
3.  The Ponce inset shows PR 500 extended to PR 123 even though the spreadsheet does not.  (maybe a "ToPR500" or "PR500Con" since I do not see a road name here)

GMSV shows this supposed extension as gated off (7/2021).

4.  Have there been any updates on PR 9?

None that I'm aware of.

6.  Is PR 516 at the right location?

The DTOP map shows it ending at the municipal boundary.

7.  Are you sure that there are one-way sections of PR 123 and PR 5516 at PA 521? (Maybe the point here should be relocated??)

The endpoints for 521 & 5516 are at a plaza encircled by one-way traffic.

PR 128:  Should PR 4431 mostly instead be PR 431? 

According to a note on the map, it's 4431.

PR 130:  OSM and the Here Maps show a PR 130R.  Obviously I cannot prove its existence.  No further comments.

GMSV near there shows no evidence of it being signed.

PR 132: 
1.  Is there a segment of PR 383 that should connect to this road?  (or is this PR 3384?)

3384 doesn't go that far per the DTOP map.

PR 141:
1.  Is the PR144 point at the southern end at the right location?
2.  Is LomaZar a correct label?

The junction with 144 is an oblong one-way loop. Loma de la Zarza is the name of the peak at the end of that road. I don't know of any official name for that road.

PR 148:  The route shown is fine, but the spreadsheet seems to indicate that another section exists along PR 156 somewhere.

If it did exist, it would be near the 156/781 junction, but I found no evidence of it.

PR 152:
1.  Is the south end of PR 810 at the right location?
2.  Is CamMonGon a continuous route?  I am unsure if it is a useful visible point.

Per the DTOP map, 814 crosses 152, and 810 loops around to the west. I created a point for CamManGon since a shaping point was needed there, and since another road with that name exists nearby, it's possible they may eventually connect and increase the utility of this point.

PR 171: 
1.  Should "FutPR731" be made a visible point in the area?
2.  The shaping point north of PR733 could be made into a visible point...

Until PR731 is built, there's no need for a visible point there. The other shaping point is in between points only 1.67 miles apart, so it's fine as-is.

PR 173:
2.  GSV seems to indicate there is a loop around PR 728.

This isn't clear to me. Google satellite images appear to show 2-way traffic, while ESRI's does not, but I don't know which has newer photos. The GMSV car  is driving against the supposed one-way traffic, but that doesn't necessarily mean anything.

PR 174:
1.  CllSie does not seem to be correct.
2.  PR 832 is not signed looking at GSV.  I would link it if I could prove this from PR 833.

OSM and Google both call that road Calle Los Sierra. What would you call the point? And since there's no imagery at the other end of 832, I'll leave it in until it's shown to be unsigned.

PR 178:  PR3_W should be PR3.  (On PR 3, PR178_W should be just PR178.)

It intersects PR 3 at both ends, so calling it PR3_W isn't incorrect.

PR 179:  The shaping point north of PR748 should be replaced with a nearby visible point.

There's only a little over 2 miles between the visible points there, and only OSM has names for the streets there.

PR 180:  The shaping point between PR3 and PR701 should be replaced by a visible point at Calle J(OSM)/Calle Villa Sol (HERE Maps).

Again the segment between visible points there is less than a mile long, so there's no need.

PR 181: 
1.  Are the south end at PR 3 and the point at PR 757 in the right location?
4.  AveParkGar looks like it should be PR877_N making PR877 PR877_S.

I moved the endpoint to PR 3 since that's where the km-post is. 877's km-posts continue north on Av Trujillo Alto past the intersection with Av Park Gardens, so that point is not an intersection with PR 877.

PR 184:  Is PR 7184 missing or is there just a graph connection missing there?

7184 doesn't appear to be signed.

PR 186:  PR 9966 seems to be signed as PR 966 for some reason.

PR 966 exists somewhere else. PR 9966 is signed on this road at the PR 191 end.

PR 191:  What led to this route being split in two?

Did you not notice this or this?

PR 198:  PR 204 seems to be signed as PR 9939 here. Maybe this is an error.

I believe that it is.

PR 199 (San Juan):  It looks like a point is needed at PR 837.  ToPR837 should be AveSanIgn.

That's not PR 837, so I moved the ToPR837 point to that intersection.

PR 200: 
1.  Is the western end correct?

Where PR 200 ends and PR 994 begins is unclear. This certainly needs a field check.

PR 205:  Does not seem to be posted from PR 31 or PR 53 (signed as "PR 31").  I am unsure if this should be included.

Hard to say what this says. Could be 205, could be directing toward 31. Another good spot for a field check.

PR 212:  This is signed as part of PR 4494.

Yes, but it's also signed with a pentagon normally used on 2xx routes

PR 301:  Is MirSal correct and at the right location?

Mirador de las Salinas is a viewing tower located by the salt flats. I can replace this with a hidden point if you want.

PR 306:  Looks fine.  The Excel spreadsheet indicates that this goes east of PR 101 though.

The DTOP map doesn't show anything east of 101.

PR 309:  Am I missing something going on between PR 309 and PR 103?

AFAIK there's no connection between the two yet.

PR 315:  Is Cll65Inf_S correct?

Since there's no name on that part of the road, I went with what OSM called it north of there (Calle Regimiento 65 de Infanteria).

PR 329:  Seems fine.  I am not 100% sure it goes to PR 117 though based on the map and spreadsheet.

The DTOP map shows them connecting.

PR 333:  Should the section of PR 116 and PR 4116 be part of PR 4116 instead of PR 333?  What is up with FutPR334?

Google & OSM both call this 333. The DTOP map shows a proposed 334 extending to the southwest through the state forest.

PR 335:  Is PR 3335 missing?

There's no 3335 in the spreadsheet or on the DTOP map.

PR 345:  Should these two routes be combined?  (It is signed from PR 2.)

I split it because there's no way to get from one segment to the other southbound.

PR 348:  Is PR 380 missing from the HB?

PR 380 is not signed at PR 2.

PR 349:  Is there a missing graph connection with PR 105?

PR 105 doesn't go that far west.

PR 365 (Maricao) :  I am unsure how to describe this one.  I am very much unsure if it is correct.
PR 366:  See PR 365 (Maricao).

The DTOP map shows Future 365 meeting 366 there. It's not clear whether 365 and 366 are concurrent to 3366 (which is not on the map), although the DTOP manual says that this entire segment is part of 366.

PR 371:  CjonTor may not be correct.

What would you call Callejón Tortgo? If you meant that the location is slightly off, there's some discrepancy between OSM and ESRI imagery, and I went with the imagery.

PR 374 (Yauco):  Fine if PR 372 and PR 373 are fine.
PR 374 (Lares):  Fine.

It appears that the two segments connect now, so I combined the files.

PR 412:  Are we sure that this route does not extend to PR 115?

GMSV shows a broken old km-post there, but the manual puts the end one block east.

PR 416:  Signage seems to indicate that PR 416 may be concurrent with PR 417 in some form.

But there's nothing affirming that in the DTOP manual ot the Excel file.

PR 418:  GSV at the northern end seems to indicate that PR 111 extends west of PR 2 to here or even PR 115.

I field-checked this area on a trip less than 5 years ago, and this is what made sense then (I did not keep the notes). 111 may be an old name for 1107.

PR 442:  Is the northern end at the right location?

According to the DTOP map, yes.

PR 451:  I am pretty sure that this should be extended to PR 111.

That's 4451 intersecting 111, not 451 (despite the sign). According to the DTOP manual, both 451 and 4451 end at "end of road". Maybe there is (or was) a plan to connect them, but I don't have any evidence that it's all one route now.

PR 459:  Seems fine with the exception of wondering whether PR 463 makes it here yet.
PR 463:  Probably fine beyond whether it makes it to PR 459 or not.

There's no road showing up in aerial imagery yet.

PR 466:  Is CllDelPena correct? (assuming this does not go to PR 113)

The DTOP manual states that the end is "Delfina Peña St" but I don't have a street map of Isabela so I don't know exactly which street this is.

PR 469:  May be fine, could this extend to PR 2 by the baseball stadium?
PR 485:  Does this make it to PR 119?  Who knows....

Not according to the DTOP manual or the Excel file.

PR 486:  Is PR4486 at the right location?

The Excel file says that there's around 7 km between the 4486 and 488 junctions, so I think this is closer to the correct location than where OSM has it. It also appears to match the location on the DTOP map.

PR 495:  Is a point missing for PR 4403?

According to the Excel file and the DTOP manual, 4403 ends at 110.

PR 497:  Is End at the right location?

The spreadsheet and manual both say the entire route is only 2.2-2.3 km long, so this is my best estimate of the end.

[mapcat]

Responses to review through PR 1000:

PR 503 (Adjuntas):  Is End at the right location?

It's not clear exactly where it ends now since the southern-most segment N of the reservoir appears to no longer be maintained. Moved to end per imagery.

PR 503 (Ponce):  Is the south end at the right location?

The manual says the end is Calle Salsa.

PR 505:  It looks like Cll1 should be CllA.

Where did you get that? Lacking other information, I went with OSM.

PR 506:  Is End at the right location?

GMSV shows it turning into a dirt road south of there. It's proposed to go to PR 1 eventually.

PR 514:  Does this actually extend north of PR 5514?

According to the manual and the DTOP map, 5514 starts south of the north end of 514.

PR 518R:  Is End at the right location?

According to the DTOP map it ends within the state forest.

PR 520:  Is LomRayo at the right location?

OSM doesn't show any road names there so I moved the point to a better spot for shaping and hid it.

PR 530:  Is End at the right location?

The rest of it hasn't been built yet according to the imagery.

PR 536:  Should PR 5536 be added?

5536 isn't signed at PR 1 so I renamed the point "OldPR536".

PR 540:  Should this be extended to PR 551?

Not according to the DTOP map.

PR 547:  Is End at the right location?

According to the DTOP map it is, and the length is close to the 1.9km length in the manual.

PR 554:  Is this route legitimately missing?

The manual called it proposed, but since something exists there in the aerials I added it.

PR 555:  Is End at the right location?

It's impossible to know for sure, but there's a bridge there at a point close to where it should end according to the manual.

PR 559:  Is End at the right location?

It matches its location on the DTOP map.

PR 561:  Is End at the right location?

Also matches the map.

PR 568:  Replace the shaping point near PR 5155 with a visible one at SalMor.

Where did you get that name for the bridge? I added the point but called it "ToPR5155".

PR 570:  PR149 should be PR149_LomN.

I changed 149 to 149_N and 149_N to 149 so that the concurrency is between _S & _N. Did likewise for PR 149.

PR 572:  Is the south end at the correct location?

According to the DTOP map it is (0.7 km in the manual).

PR 574:  Is End at the right location?

I checked the length using GMaps and it matches the length in the manual.

PR 576:  Please clarify where PR 576 and PR 702 end.

Also used GMaps here to determine the point where the switch happens.

PR 586:  Is End at the right location?

Seems to be according to GMaps.

PR 592:  Seems fine.  (unsure about PR 14 here and at PR 570 here)

PR 14 is split here using one-way streets so I adjusted the 570 & 592 points to reflect this.

PR 610:  Is End at the right location?

Imagery is hard to read but the road doesn't appear to be finished yet.

PR 614:  Does this route extend west of PR 6614?

Aerials show a paved road there following the proposed route on the DTOP map.

PR 621:  Is End at the right location?

It's impossible to use GMaps to find the endpoint (the road is missing from their map) so I used my best judgment. The manual and spreadsheet differ in the length (7.5 km vs 9.5).

PR 635:  Should PR 4489 connect to this road?  Is there a PR 635R?

OSM seems to have 4489 in the wrong place, and there's no indication of a 635R in any of the DTOP sources.

PR 644:  Is End at the right location?

That's where imagery shows the road ending.

PR 646:  Does this actually extend to PR 155 on its west end?

Not according to the manual.

PR 647:  Are the PR 677 and PR 620 intersections that close to each other?

Imagery suggests that they are.

PR 648:  Is End at the right location?

I used GMaps to verify that the length matches that in the manual/spreadsheet.

PR 652:  It looks like this may extend slightly east of PR 10.

Not according to the manual and spreadsheet.

PR 655:  Is AreMue correct?

AreMue = Arecibo Muelle (harbor or dock), but I changed it to End to simplify.

PR 658:  Seems fine.  It may extend farther south now.

I used distance on GMaps again to locate the endpoint.

PR 660:  Is RmlBarObr_E correct?

The manual calls that road Ramal Barrio Obrero.

PR 661:  Is End at the right location?

GMaps didn't allow routing here, so I made my best guess for where 2.2 km should be.

PR 672:  Is end at the right location or does this extend to PR 643?

Used GMaps routing again, which places the end short of 643.

PR 677 (Vega Alta):  I am unsure of the area around PR 6677.
PR 677 (Dorado):  Is this route in correctly?

I used the routing shown on the DTOP map.

PR 680:  Is this route missing?

It does not appear to be signed.

PR 682:  Is BosCam correct?

I don't have any information on the name of the road, but it goes to the Bosque Estatal de Cambalache.

PR 693:  Should AveJoseEfr be PR6696?
PR 696:  See PR 693.

PR 6696 didn't make it into the manual or the spreadsheet, and the road appears to be unsigned.

PR 705:  Does this road circle around?

According to the manual it does.

PR 707:  Is the western end at the right location?

The manual and spreadsheet have different lengths (2.0 km / 2.4 km). I went with 2.0.

PR 725:  Looks like at least part of PR 726 is actually PR 7725.
PR 726:  See PR 725.

Both the manual and spreadsheet call this road 726 and refer to 7725 as unassigned. Since there's no other evidence of 7725 signs, for now I'll consider the sign an error.

PR 728:  Is End at the right location?

The spreadsheet and manual list it with different lengths (0.5 / 0.8 km) and this is 0.5.

PR 733:  Is End at the right location?

It measures 1.5 km long per GMaps, which is the length listed for it in the manual.

PR 742:  Is End at the right location?  May extend to PR 743. (instead of PR 7042?)

It seems that there's still a short gap at the north end of 742 per the imagery, so despite signage I'll leave 743 alone for now. If you think it would be better to change 7042 to a second 742 segment, I'm willing to do that.

PR 745:  Is End at the right location?

There are plans to extend it to 7740 but at this point there's no road there in the imagery.

PR 746:  Is End at the right location?

The manual and spreadsheet say it's supposed to end at the hydroelectric plant, and it does.

PR 750:  Is End at the right location?

GMaps says this measures 1.5 km as drafted.

PR 752:  Is End at the right location?

The spreadsheet and manual disagree on the length (4.1 / 4.9 km) and this is 4.1.

PR 753:  Is this put in correctly with PR 7754?

This follows the only path that appears capable of eventually connecting to PR 762. The manual set the length at 8.0 km so I cut it back to that.

PR 754:  Is End at the right location?

The manual said it's 1.9 km, and GMaps says that's how long this is.

PR 755:  I do not think that this extends to PR 3.

I didn't draft it that way, so it's unclear what error you're pointing out.

PR 760: It looks like PR 901 has a concurrency with this route.  (maybe to PR 939)  Is End at the right location?

That sign says "Hacia" (To). The manual says 901 starts at 760.

PR 764:  Is End at the right location?

GMaps says it's the same length that the manual says (0.5 km).

PR 768:  I think this route should be relooked at.

It matches the description in the manual and the trace corresponds to what's shown on the DTOP map. What's your concern?

PR 778:  It looks like this and PR 7778 may need to switch.

The bridge is PR 7778 according to the manual & spreadsheet. GMSV shows two signs at the junction of 778 & 7778 but one is illegible and the other is facing away from the camera. I can delete 7778 if you're convinced it's not signed as such but I'd prefer to know what's on those signs before doing that.

PR 782:  Does this route go north of PR 156?

Not according to the manual or the spreadsheet.

PR 786:  Is End at the right location?

GMaps says it's the right length (0.8 km).

PR 788:  Is PR 766 missing?

766 is not in the manual or the spreadsheet (or GMSV).

PR 794:  Is End at the right location?

It measures correctly (4.6 km) in GMaps.

PR 798:  Consider redoing the PR1 labels.

I chose the order to follow the direction of PR 1 (and the km posts).

PR 800:  Is End at the right location?

The routing in OSM doesn't match the DTOP map or the manual. The end was determined by measuring a 4.9 km segment on GMaps.

PR 801:  Is End at the right location?

GMaps used again to establish the endpoint (2.2 km).

PR 813:  Is End at the right location?

GMaps again.

PR 814:  Is CamDonTito correct?

OSM & Google call it that. Do you have a better source showing something else?

PR 817:  Seems fine, but I do not see this route on the spreadsheet, map, or GSV.

The DTOP map and the manual show the route as proposed, but a roadway exists in the aerial imagery.

PR 818:  Should Cor/Veg be End?

The spot is at a municipio boundary, so why not use that?

PR 826 (Lago la Plata):  Is End at the right location?

(PR 826 (Lago la Plata) is vanilla PR 826 now) The segment measured 2.4 km on GMaps.

PR 833:  Is there a PR 833R?

There's no 833R on the DTOP map or in the manual or spreadsheet.

PR 834:  Fine if this route is still correct.  OSM shows it relocated onto the Expressway.

OSM currently shows it following the old route, so maybe someone had jumped the gun when you first looked at this. GMSV shows no km posts or signage on the expressway, so I'm leaving this alone.

PR 835:  Does this make it to PR 834 now?

I'm not sure but I extended it anyway seeing that there is a roadway there.

PR 839:  Does this make it to PR 167 and/or PR 855 somehow?

PR 855, yes, so extended there. At the other end, km 0 is at the marginal road, so no change.

PR 865:  Is PR 865R a thing?

If 865R is a thing, it's not a signed thing, at least at PR 2. GMSV hints that there may be a km post here, but I think that's just green paint. Regardless, there's nothing about this in any of the DTOP documents.

PR 871:  Is the northern end at the right location?

Measured 1.0 km with GMaps.

PR 873:  Is CllMar correct?

The manual states that it ends at "Marginal near Rte 1" instead of PR 1.

PR 880:  Is CllRob correct?

The manual says it ends at "Robledo Street", and the street where I ended it is closest to where 1.0 km should be.

PR 890:  Is the southern end actually at PR 8855?

DTOP docs say it ends at PR 855, and that's where km 0 is.

PR 900:  Is End at the right location?

According to the aerial imagery, yes. There's no road where OSM or GMaps show one.

PR 901:  See PR 760.  Is PR 9901 missing?

There's no 9901 in any of the DTOP documents, so despite the sign, even if I wanted to include it, I have no idea where it goes or how long it is.

PR 905:  It looks like PR 9905 needs to be checked.  Does this extend to PR 917?

Imagery shows a gap between the end and PR 917, so I extended it to that gap.

PR 908:  I am unsure if this and PR 909 have been handled right.

I redid 908 since it seems to have been rerouted to no longer follow the route in the DTOP map near 909. The route on the DTOP map isn't the same length as the route described in the manual, so this routing is consistent with the manual.

PR 909:  See PR 908.  Is PR 9907 missing?

Besides moving the 908 point, I changed the 9907 point to CamCab since that route appears to be unsigned. The new length is also consistent with the manual's number.

PR 912:  Is End at the right location?

It measures 5.1 km according to GMaps.

PR 916:  GSV indicates that this route may extend north of PR 183.

The spreadsheet and DTOP map don't agree with the manual, so I went with 2 out of 3.

PR 927:  Is PR 9927 a thing?  PR53 should be ToPR53.

9927 exists in the manual but not the spreadsheet or DTOP map. The description in the manual doesn't match what's in OSM so I'm choosing to ignore it.

PR 928:  Does PR 9929 make it here?

9929 is not what OSM says it is.

PR 929:  Is PR 9926 missing?

9926 added.

PR 939:  Is End at the right location? See PR 760 and PR 901.

It matches up with the length in the manual.

PR 942:  Is End at the right location?

This one matches up too.

PR 945:  Is PR 8852 missing?

PR 8852 is actually a different road, so changed the point to End.

PR 947:  Is End at the right location?

Measured 2.2 km with GMaps.

PR 950:  Is this route in there correctly beyond the endpoints?

As drafted it measures 8.3 km. Since the spreadsheet lists it at 8.2 km and the manual 8.4, I'm okay with this length. Moving it to a different routing would make it much longer than 8.4 km.

PR 955:  Consider editing the PR 3 points.  Should the east end be put at the PR 3/PR 968 intersection?

The order matches the order on PR 3. Any scheme other than _A, _B, etc would be unnecessarily complicated and solve nothing. The manual says the east end intersects PR 3 at km 32.1, so this is closer than the other intersection.

PR 961:  Is the south end at the right location?

GMaps says that endpoint makes it 0.6 km long, same as the manual.

PR 963:  Is this at the right location?

There's a sign of some sort hiding here, and this is where the DTOP map places it.

PR 968:  Seems fine, should maybe be extended.

There's a gate at the end, and the length of 4.0 km checks out.

PR 970:  Is PR 9970 missing?

9970 doesn't appear on the DTOP map or in the spreadsheet, only the manual.

PR 976:  I am pretty sure this does not make it to PR 195.

The end is at Cll Igualdad, not 195. That's how I drafted it, so I'm not sure what you're seeing.

PR 985:  Is there a PR 9985?

9985 only exists in the manual (and OSM), not on the DTOP map or the spreadsheet. And the manual doesn't put it where OSM does.

PR 987:  Is CabSanJuan correct?  I think End is correct.

CabSanJuan is the name of the nature reserve with an entrance there (Cabezas de San Juan).

PR 989:  Is End at the right location?

I turned it into a loop since that's the only solution following the description in the manual (0.85 km, ending at itself) that made any sense.

PR 990 (Rio Grande):  Is there a PR 9991 here?

No, only the one intersecting the Luquillo segment.

PR 992:  PR3_W should just be PR3.

PR3_W is the western junction with PR 3, so there's nothing wrong with this point name.

[mapcat]

Responses to the rest of the review:

PR 1107:  Should AveJuanSan be added to this and PR 2?

It's not that far away from an existing point. If someone needs it I'll add it.

PR 3131:  Is End at the right location?

I measured it with GMaps, and it came out to 4.4km, which is the length in the manual and spreadsheet.

PR 3330:  This route should be entirely rechecked.  Fine based on the spreadsheet though.

It's not in the spreadsheet, but the manual lists the 2017 length as 1.3 km so I cut it back slightly.

PR 3344:  Should PR 103 be signed in this area?

The sign in that image is incorrect, since 103 does not head east from that intersection, but follows the road marked 309. I deleted most of 309 and replaced it with a new PR103Hor, which is in the spreadsheet but not the manual.

PR 3345:  Is this actually part of PR 345?

No. PR 345 is drafted according to the manual.

PR 3363:  I am unsure if this one goes to PR 2 or PR 102...

According to both the manual and the spreadsheet, it ends at 2 even though there's no junction. Truncated.

PR 3366:  Is End at the right location?

It measures correctly (1.2 km) in GMaps.

PR 3384:  This route should be rechecked.

It's not in the spreadsheet, but according to the manual only 1.6 km have been built (as of 2017). The west end is described as PR 3383, but that hasn't been built yet.

PR 4119:  I am also unsure that CllAmaBra_E is correct.

Both GMaps and OSM call that road Cll Amador Brall. The manual says 4119 follows something called "Nolla Road" that I can't find on any map.

PR 4401:  Is End at the right location?

The spreadsheet says it's 0.9 km, the manual 0.8 km, so I moved the end to 0.85 km.

PR 4417:  I just noticed that there may be a PR 417R.

PR 417R doesn't appear in any DTOP documents.

PR 4435:  Is End at the right location?

I extended it to the end of the road as shown in aerial imagery.

PR 4441:  Is End at the right location?

There's a gate there and it matches the length in the spreadsheet and manual. What makes you think it might be wrong?

PR 4446:  Is End at the right location?

The measured lenght checks out.

PR 4485:  Is End at the right location?

Same.

PR 4489:  This one needs to be rechecked. Also is there a PR 489R?

It follows the path depicted on the DTOP map. There's no evidence of a 489R in any DTOP docs.

PR 5512:  Is End at the right location?

The length matches what DTOP says it should be.

PR 5519:  Is End at the right location?

Here too.

PR 5520:  Is PR 1150 a thing, and either way, is End at the right location?

DTOP doesn't list any 1150, and the length is correct.

PR 5550 (Juana Díaz):  I am not sure that this route is correct at all.  The segment [w]est of PR 149 does not seem to even intersect it.

The segment or segments in Juana Díaz is/are not signed per recent GMSV, so axing this was an easy solution.

PR 5553:  Does this extend to what may be PR 1150?

Not according to DTOP.

PR 5567:  Is End at the right location?

It's 2.2 km long according to the manual, 2.1 in the spreadsheet, so it matches one of those.

PR 6109:  Does this extend south of PR 651?

The manual says no.

PR 6603:  Is End at the right location?

The length matches up.

PR 6609:  Does this extend back to PR 10 on the north end?

Not according to GMSV, and the length as drafted matches the manual.

PR 6616:  Is End at the right location?

It agrees with the length in the manual and spreadsheet.

PR 6677:  Is End at the right location?

So does this one.

PR 7062:  Is End at the right location?

The manual says it's 0.5 km long, but the spreadsheet claims it's 0.8. Aerial imagery shows a road with a maximum length of 0.65 km so I went with that.

PR 7173:  Is End at the right location?

It matches what DTOP says it should be.

PR 7709:  Is End at the right location?

Honestly, this one is just a guess. It's not in the spreadsheet, and the entry in the manual doesn't list a length. There's only a dashed line on the DTOP map. I'm comfortable deleting if it seems spurious.

PR 7710:  Is End at the right location?

DTOP docs say it is.

PR 7715:  Does this extend to PR 1?

Recent GMSV doesn't show a sign anywhere on the route, so I deleted it.

PR 7727:  Is End at the right location?

The length agrees with what's in the manual and spreadsheet.

PR 7728:  Is End at the right location?

This one isn't in the spreadsheet, the manual lists the entire length as proposed, and it's all a dashed line on the DTOP map. Gone.

PR 7738:  Is End at the right location?

Looks like it.

PR 7748:  Is End at the right location?

The spreadsheet says it's 3.1 km long, the manual 2.6. This is 2.6, and it ends where anything resembling a highway seems to end in aerial imagery (which is not great at this location).

PR 7759:  Is End at the right location?

It matches the length shown in the manual and spreadsheet.

PR 7762:  Is End at the right location?

So does this one.

PR 7769:  Is End at the right location?

This too.

PR 7780:  Does this extend to PR 167?

The DTOP map and the manual have it ending where I dropped the "End" point. The spreadsheet says it ends at 167. Map & manual win.

PR 7783:  Is this route put in correctly?

The path I selected matches the DTOP map more closely than the one chosen by the OSM editor.

PR 7784:  GSV shows this route going in the other direction from PR 172...

That sign is wrong (as is OSM). First, there are no km posts north of 172. Second, the manual and DTOP map describe/show it following the route drafted, and the spreadsheet even refers to Calle 7 as an intermediate point.

PR 7786:  Should maybe be extended?

No, it matches the length in the official documents.

PR 7787:  Is End at the right location?

The manual says it's 2.4 km long, the spreadsheet 2.5, and this is 2.5.

PR 8825:  CllAme should be CllHacLum.

What's wrong with naming the waypoint for Calle Amelia? It's not like one of the streets is obviously more important than the other.

PR 8826:  Is End at the right location?

It matches the official length.

PR 8838:  Seems fine, but why is there a PR 8839 mentioned in the spreadsheet?

That's probably the unsigned connector to PR 21.

PR 9045:  Does this extend to PR 8852 or PR 853?

Imagery says not yet.

PR 9188:  Is this route missing?

Yes, because it's not signed.

PR 9902:  Is End at the right location?

According to official sources, yes.

PR 9923:  Is End at the right location?

The manual says it's 1.5 km long, and the spreadsheet lists it at 2.1. Extended to 2.1 since it looks like there may be plans to build more.

PR 9934:  Fine, but is there a PR 189R to account for here?

PR 189R does not appear to be signed.

PR 9959:  Probably fine.  I am not sure why OSM shows it going on another loop back to PR 3.  (Maybe the spreadsheet indicates such...)

That eastern loop is officially part of 9959 but it's not signed.

PR 9960:  Is PR 963 related to this somehow?  This may loop back to PR 186.

This road does not connect to 963. The length matches what official docs say it should be.

PR 9984:  Does this extend to PR 9988?

The manual says it's 0.9 km, the spreadsheet claims 0.8, and this is 0.8.

PR 9989:  Does this connect back to PR 9988?

No, it matches the length in the spreadsheet. The manual makes it out to be 0.1 km shorter.

PR 9991:  Does this connect to PR 990 (Rio Grande)?

No, what's there matches what's in the manual and spreadsheet.

[mapcat]

I have no further comments on what was submitted so you are fine with going through the Datacheck Errors and NMPs.

I did find a few unused alternate labels on the PR interstates that you may as well remove while you are at it.

pr.ipr001(2): 0 15
pr.ipr003(1): 33(PR53)

-Mark

I'll try get to the errors and NMPs and unused alt labels by the end this week. While I work on that I welcome comments on this set from all other users.

[mapcat]

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5624 will activate the system. Thanks to all for corrections, suggestions, and other input.

[Jim]

Though I've been to or nor do I have any immediate plans to visit PR, it's great to see this one activated.  Thanks to everyone involved.