Thanks. I think we have three categories. Each category has it's own priority for me.
A. Data processing bugsData processing is the base for data displayed in stats. I think the highest priority is having correct data. There are still some issues, e.g.:
-
Overall rankings show "TBD"-
HB: Incorrect values in % column (traveled)- ...
B. Features for users1.
km/mile conversionAlready started
2.
Move domain name to travelmapping.netIs it still planned? I have no problem with tm.teresco.org but we should establish travelmapping.net as soon as possible if we ever wanna do it.
3. Better way to select countries and regions:
*
multi-region countries *
More accessible list or drop down box to select regions *
First step is already done
4.
Open Highway Browser for specific routes from the mapI generally don't like the way how we do it now. I usually open the map of one or more regions displaying my data to see if my latest trip contains any new segment or I plan some detours for my next trip because of untraveled gaps.
5.
Top Stats6.
List of travelers who have traveled a system/region7.
Better way to show update entry changes8.
Front page designI think this might be done in combination with moving the domain name. If that's not planned now, my priority is quite low.
I have more ideas how we could design the "highway browser" or let's say "how to eliminate the HB" to make the handling easier but I think it's a way too far right now.
C. Features for developers1.
Automated update- Minimum goal is that a contributor can check that the submitted (highway) data is correct and won't fail the next (manual) site update.
- Maximum goal is that an user sents an updated list file and the site is automatically updated
2. HDX integration
-
File selection for graphs and NMP
- I wish that it would have the same code like the site itself. Every fix must be done twice, e.g. scroll bars are again visible in HDX etc.
3.
Data check NMP- Display errors on the site like other data checks
- Integrate "nmpfps.log" to "datacheckfps.csv"
- ...
4.
Waypoint editorLow priority right now but if CHM would be down one day, this would get the highest priority! Maybe we should do a first step?
5. Instruction Manual / "Rules"
Would get a high priority if CHM would be down one day. I think we should minimum "save the text" so that we don't have to start from scratch.
Of course, there are more minor issues reported on Github which might have less effort to be fixed.