NJ: I-295 and US 130 Points near Westville

[Markkos1992]

Should the points on I-295 and/or US 130 be redone to show that the US 130 concurrency ends at Exit 23? 

Also should the Exit 24 point be split into Exits 24A and 24B (seems to be separate interchanges with separate roads separated by a railroad).

EDIT:  I accidentally put this with the solved threads.

[yakra]

Looking over NJ recently; ISTR checking out this area & things looked OK, but I can give another look-see.

During the meanwhilst, I've moved the topic to "Updates to Highway Data"

[yakra]

Should the points on I-295 and/or US 130 be redone to show that the US 130 concurrency ends at Exit 23?

Looked again, and I agree: Leave I-295; change US130. Might make the graphs a wee bit uglier, but hey. Perfection cannot be achieved. "Where the centerlines cross."

Also should the Exit 24 point be split into Exits 24A and 24B (seems to be separate interchanges with separate roads separated by a railroad).

Wow, man! This is a fine example of how things can get wibbly-wobbly. A nice, annoying, test of "One Point Per Interchange" vs. "Double Half Interchanges"...
• Is it one single interchange?
• Is it two half interchanges?
• Is it two discrete, albeit partial, interchanges?
As they both serve traffic only to/from the east, and serve separate roads & areas on separate sides of the tracks (albeit close together), I'm kinda leaning toward the "two discrete (partial) interchanges" option. The "24" label is not in use, otherwise I'd be a bit more hesitant to make a change. An added bonus is a graph connection between I-295 & NJ45, and thus an "Intersecting/Concurrent Routes" listing in the HB.

[yakra]

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/1425