A small realignment, within the footprint (which has grown southwards a bit) of the interchange itself. Compare Google, Mapnik, and Satellite. IMO no
*OldI-49 points are justified here. With I-49 now having a clear centerline though, it may be worthwhile if you so choose to move the
67B point, Along with US62 & US71 (which will also require relabelings) and US71SprFay. On that note...
US71SprFay!There is nothing marking
US71SprFay as a US
Spur route. It's shown on AHTD's
city and
county maps as a business route, and inventoried as a business route in the shapefiles: SECTN = 17B.
That Section number is not unique to the Fulbright Expy. FWIW,
US71BusFay itself has SECTN = 17B from
US71Spr to the Washington/Benton county line, between
HunAve and
AR264_E.
(SECTN numbers don't necessarily mean that much; remember how AR9S in Izard County had the same SECTN number on all three legs...)Is it signed for US71
Bus? The east end only has shields TO what's at the other end. I didn't see any reassurance markers on the route itself. The west end has pretty clear 71B signage, as shown on David Backlin's photos and historic GMSV. However, one could argue that this is a case of a missing TO, signage for a glorified ramp... At the
NorBlvd interchange in the middle, "Fulbright Expy" is signed, text-only on a LGS, on all 3 approaches to the southern roundabout. On the north side, there's just a TO (49) approaching on Shiloh Dr westbound. Eastbound, there's
this. The TO above the (49) can obviously be said to apply to the {71} as well. Don't quite know what to make of the {71B} though...
Should Fulbright Expy be added to
usasf instead, with
US71SprFay as an AltRouteName?
