IL: three minor point errors

[yakra]

US51BusBlo: VetPky -> I-55BL ?
IL83: missing point at I-294
IL116: US34Byp -> US34 ?

[Highway63]

US 51BusBlo: I guess, but that label is in use.
IL83: ...doesn't technically intersect I-294? The exit on I-294 for IL50/83 is combined and the ramps to 127th Street are pretty far apart from each other. The only movement that doesn't pass through the intersection of 127th and Cicero is the EB I-294 fork to westbound 127th (near Engle Road).
IL116: US34Byp exists because US 34 existed before the Biggsville bypass was built and I didn't want to break anyone's list.

[froggie]

IL 83 is also a recently discussed situation.  But Jason's right.  Does not intersect I-294, nor does there really need to be a point for 294.

[yakra]

US 51BusBlo: I guess, but that label is in use.

No problems here; that's what AltLabels are for. VetPky may be in use, the I-55BL is nowhere in the file.
I-55BL +VetPky http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.459171&lon=-88.992903

IL116: US34Byp exists because US 34 existed before the Biggsville bypass was built and I didn't want to break anyone's list.

Aah yes, tougher situation here. US34 is in use as an AltLabel for IL94_N.
On the one hand, one could relabel it and make an updates entry about the new location of the US34 label.
OTOH, ISTR Tim saying something back in the day about how for some newsworthy changes if , say, US15_S is already in use and would now refer to a different location, use a US15_Foo city suffix, for example. I can't find anything in the Maintaining files for activated routes manual; maybe it was on the forum... In any case, this seems in accord with the emphasis on not breaking .lists as expressed in that manual. I can live with whatever you choose to do here.

IL83: ...doesn't technically intersect I-294? The exit on I-294 for IL50/83 is combined and the ramps to 127th Street are pretty far apart from each other. The only movement that doesn't pass through the intersection of 127th and Cicero is the EB I-294 fork to westbound 127th (near Engle Road).

I should have been more specific here; I meant at 147th:
I-57 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.624040&lon=-87.679868
I-294 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.626058&lon=-87.691511
IL50_S http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.625291&lon=-87.737331

I-294 itself:
Looks like existing +x06 was converted to a visible point in situ. I suggest moving it for an Intersecting/Concurrent Routes/graph connection.
Exits 8 & 9 are labeled as exits 7 & 8 respectively, which matches Google Maps, but StreetView shows 8 & 9, as in OSM.
"7" is in use, and must become an AltLabel, but "8" is unused and can be safely moved.
If I make these label & coord changes, and also remove unused AltLabels, I get

Code: [Select]

I-94_E +999 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.577764&lon=-87.581978
2 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.578246&lon=-87.636352
4 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.578021&lon=-87.665620
5 +I-80_W http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.582933&lon=-87.680211
6 +US6 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.600842&lon=-87.681155
8 +7 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.618437&lon=-87.687293
9 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.626058&lon=-87.691511
+X05 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.634081&lon=-87.712440
12 +IL50 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.662846&lon=-87.738662
+X04 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.682047&lon=-87.778444
17 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.718799&lon=-87.806640
IL171 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.746478&lon=-87.843835
22 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.754826&lon=-87.874446
23A http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.757708&lon=-87.882901
23B +I-55 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.760813&lon=-87.892427
23C http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.771280&lon=-87.906590
27 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.818568&lon=-87.914314
29 +I-88_W http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.842615&lon=-87.919464
29B +CerRd http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.847634&lon=-87.919164
30 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.862146&lon=-87.918305
31A +I-88_E http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.869432&lon=-87.917018
31B +I-290 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.877837&lon=-87.918906
33 +US20 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.906749&lon=-87.919850
+X03 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.931560&lon=-87.919464
+X02 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.945351&lon=-87.885389
38 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.956650&lon=-87.879939
39 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.976594&lon=-87.869250
40A +I-190 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.983803&lon=-87.869725
40B +I-90 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=41.990374&lon=-87.867494
42 +TouAve http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.010052&lon=-87.868481
44 +US14 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.039062&lon=-87.868609
45 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.053467&lon=-87.868609
48 +WilRd http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.106565&lon=-87.868009
+X01 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.127670&lon=-87.887106
I-94_W +0 http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=42.151410&lon=-87.873888I'll leave this here, and il.i294.wpt in the zip file I send will contain only the NMP fixes, otherwise untouched. It'll match the most recent GitHub commit.

[Highway63]

Adding I-55BL to US51BusBlo with VetPky as alt label.

IL 83: It's entirely possible I simply missed the point while originally making the route because those ramps are so tight in. I had the 127th/Cicero intersection in mind because I had just been changing that.

I-294: Copying that code and pasting to send file.

[neroute2]

IL 83: It's entirely possible I simply missed the point while originally making the route because those ramps are so tight in. I had the 127th/Cicero intersection in mind because I had just been changing that.

It's recent construction (built when the I-57 ramps were added).

[yakra]

That may explain why the dust hasn't cleared on the exit numbers, between osm and Google.