DEU-BY St2033
Rename DLG39 to St2033BliW and add a short branch St2033BliW
Rename Bli to St2033BliE and add a short branch St2033BliE, and move the WP to the middle of the intersection
The short branch is just the ramp of the interchange.
The wp of an interchange is always (99%) positioned to the overpass/underpass and not to the middle of the i/c
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.551899&lon=10.705919DEU-BY St2035Pot
Seems that the start point is at Augsburger Straße, and the small part between B16 and Augsburger Straße is part of B16
It's just the ramp to B16. It's usually signed "B16 AST" on mile posts (Stationszeichen). The "B16" wp is usually where "AugStr_N" is but St2035 ends here and I've closed the gap by adding the B16 AST to St2035 (0.17mi)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.715990&lon=11.178106New WP ND29?
No
DEU-BY St2035
Rename A6_W to AS6_W
Rename A6_E to AS6_E
It should be As6 on OSM. The small "s" indicated "Stadt" (town/city) and means that the district route is maintained by the town/city. It's generally not signed. I leave it A6 (route 6 of district "Augsburg").
DEU-BY St2045Lan
Rename LA19 to LAs19
Rename LA14_S to LAs14_S
Rename LA14_N to LAs14_N
See above
DEU-BY St2054
Rename A96(24) to B17
There's a one-waypoint-per-junction-rule. A96, B17 and St2054 meet at this roundabout
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.048308&lon=10.837744Rename A96(26) to A96
No, it's the 2nd A96 wp of this route. I could call them _W and _E but I prefer the motorway exit number.
Rename ToB15 to St2054AST and add St2054AST?
It's "green" on baysis map but it's a thin line. And St2054 is not indicated as usual. OSM does also not indicate St2054. Leave as-is.
DEU-BY St2055
Separate in 2 east and west of B17?
Only 6mi out of 76mi are concurrent with B17. The segments would be 47mi and 23mi. We've discussed it in the past (2016 or 2017) and if memory servers mapcat and I agreed that we wanna split the route if a remaining segment would be shorter than the (unsigned) concurrent segment. But the shortest remaining sement is 23mi, not less than 6mi.
We also split if there is no logical concurrent route or if the route number is changing (St1066 is also changing, see above, but I think it's better this way).
DEU-BY St2065
Rename St2344_E to St2344
No, it's concurrent up to A95
DEU-BY St2067
New WP at Andechser Strasse in Erling (access to the famous Kloster Andechs)
Yep, the brewery deserves a wp
Rename St2068_E and W to N and S
It usually indicates that the intersecting route leads to the east and to the west, not that the wp is more to the north or more to the south.
Only if both would lead to the east I would call them _N and _S, if you had to turn left for both routes (or vice versa)
Remove last WP (according to Baysis, B471 begins south of A96, so the part between St2070_W and A96 is not St2067 anymore, but B471.
That's tricky. There should usually only be one wp per interchange, the A96 wp. We have an exception of the one-rule-per-interchange rule because St2070 is not intersecting with A96. The segment in-between is dedicated B471 because the southern A96 i/c ramp intersects with B471 here. That's why baysis and OSM indicate B471. There are many situations like this all over Europe and I think Si and I usally handle it like this.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.083749&lon=11.151638DEU-BY St2091
New WP MU38 in Ampfing
I generally prefer having less wps. If one really needs the wp, it's always possible to request personally needed wps via the forum.
Rename St2360_E and W to N and S
See above
DEU-BY St2095
New WP at south bypass Traunstein
I would but don't have a proper name
DEU-BY St2096
Rename B304_W and E to N and S
See above
DEU-BY St2099
The endpoint is the border with Austria. You can do a St2099 Hintersee to map also the short branch to the west part of lake Hintersee. I know that it’s not allowed to drive to the border, but there is a bus service or you can go by bike. For example, St2072, between Muhle and Walchensee is also closed for private cars. There is no bus service there, I clinched it on foot...
Done.
@ALL: Any objections?
