Author Topic: WA: WA 99 duplicate point datacheck error  (Read 5623 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • Last Login:Today at 02:33:12 pm
WA: WA 99 duplicate point datacheck error
« on: February 07, 2019, 09:32:01 pm »
The recent rerouting of WA 99 in Seattle has resulted in both a point with the visible label AurAve and one with a hidden alt label AurAve.

Offline Highway63

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 538
  • Gender: Female
  • Last Login:July 03, 2024, 01:59:15 am
Re: WA: WA 99 duplicate point datacheck error
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2019, 01:13:57 am »
Also, I think the route could use a shaping point around Yesler Way so it doesn't look like the tunnel goes under the shoreline and piers.  :)

Online Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • Last Login:Today at 02:33:12 pm
Re: WA: WA 99 duplicate point datacheck error
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2019, 10:11:27 am »
Any objections to me removing the offending alt label?

Online Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • Last Login:Today at 02:33:12 pm
Re: WA: WA 99 duplicate point datacheck error
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2019, 08:38:55 pm »
Having heard no objections, I am removing the offending alt label with tonight's update.

Offline compdude787

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 08, 2024, 12:26:51 pm
Re: WA: WA 99 duplicate point datacheck error
« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2019, 10:53:33 pm »
Also, I think the route could use a shaping point around Yesler Way so it doesn't look like the tunnel goes under the shoreline and piers.  :)

Yeah, you're probably right. I will add that shaping point in.

Offline compdude787

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 08, 2024, 12:26:51 pm
Re: WA: WA 99 duplicate point datacheck error
« Reply #5 on: February 26, 2019, 01:33:32 am »

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: WA: WA 99 duplicate point datacheck error
« Reply #6 on: December 03, 2020, 02:51:23 pm »
Necroposting here, only semi-on-topic, rather than start a new topic...
Was AlaWay intended rather than AlaWy ? It's referred to as such in the updates entry.
Right now there are 762 primary labels ending in "Way" and only 14 ending in "Wy".
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline compdude787

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 08, 2024, 12:26:51 pm
Re: WA: WA 99 duplicate point datacheck error
« Reply #7 on: December 09, 2020, 06:06:53 pm »
That must have been a mistake on my part. I've looked at Thomas Guide map atlases for so many years growing up, and they always abbreviated Way as Wy, so I guess that's why I did that there.

Offline compdude787

  • TM Collaborator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 298
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:November 08, 2024, 12:26:51 pm
Re: WA: WA 99 duplicate point datacheck error
« Reply #8 on: December 14, 2020, 12:56:00 am »
Necroposting here, only semi-on-topic, rather than start a new topic...
Was AlaWay intended rather than AlaWy ? It's referred to as such in the updates entry.
Right now there are 762 primary labels ending in "Way" and only 14 ending in "Wy".

Did a pull request to fix this waypoint label as well as another on that route that had the same issue (keeping old waypoints as alternates, of course).