fraa;FRA;France Autoroutes;blue;1;active
fran;FRA;France Routes Nationales;lightsalmon;4;active
fraar;FRA;IGNORE TEST France Autoroutes with Regions;blue;1;preview
franr;FRA;IGNORE TEST France Routes Nationales with Regions;lightsalmon;4;preview
I originally wrote the code to expect stuff like this.
fragesd57;FRA;Grand-Est Routes Départementales (Moselle);yellow;5;preview
fraidfd;FRA;Île-de-France Routes Départementales;yellow;5;preview
fragesd54;FRA;Grand-Est Routes Départementales (Meurthe-et-Moselle);yellow;5;devel
Routes Départementales. Entirely new systems, to remain after the split as they are now. No counterparts in FRA.
Right?
The simplest thing for me to do is just comment these out while running the concurrency checks.
fracort;FRA;IGNORE TEST Corsica Routes Territoriales with Regions;lightsalmon;4;preview
fracort : frht :: fraar : fraa?
My code
would expect "frhtr" as the system code, but no big deal; this is in FRH, not FRA, and so doesn't affect the main split (of FRA) I'm testing.
A quick shell script to compare FRH/frht/ vs FRA-COR/fracort/
wpts='t010.wpt t011.wpt t012.wpt t020.wpt t021.wpt t022.wpt t030.wpt t040bon.wpt t040.wpt t050.wpt t101.wpt t201.wpt t202.wpt t203.wpt t204.wpt t205.wpt t301.wpt t401.wpt t402.wpt'
for wpt in $wpts; do echo $wpt; diff FRH/frht/frh.$wpt FRA-COR/fracort/fracor.$wpt; doneand they look fine.
