If you have any trouble registering for the forum, please email travmap@teresco.org for help.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
There are other resources you can look up, if you want to research this further.
Quote from: oscar on June 19, 2016, 08:28:05 pmThere are other resources you can look up, if you want to research this further.The Interstate Guide describes I-194 as being a 5.3 mile route.http://www.interstate-guide.com/i-194_nd.htmlThanks,
Quote from: Quidditch33 on June 19, 2016, 09:16:51 pmQuote from: oscar on June 19, 2016, 08:28:05 pmThere are other resources you can look up, if you want to research this further.The Interstate Guide describes I-194 as being a 5.3 mile route.http://www.interstate-guide.com/i-194_nd.htmlThanks,I see it shown as a 1.20 mile route on that page. The 5.3 miles is the combination of I-194 and ND 810. Unless I'm missing something in my reading of that page.
Quidditch33, word of advice, don't trust Google Maps like it's the Holy Grail. There are a lot of things that are wrong on it.
To slightly change the subject (yes, I know this is an old thread), would it make sense to add the rest of the freeway portion of the Bismarck Expressway in the Select Named Freeways system (since ND 810 is unsigned)?
Collaborators please correct me if I'm wrong but was the threshold 5 or 10 miles?.
Quote from: SSOWorld on July 04, 2016, 03:13:44 pmCollaborators please correct me if I'm wrong but was the threshold 5 or 10 miles?.I'm not sure it matters what it was. It's more a case of whether or not yakra wants to add it.