Author Topic: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene  (Read 8291 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #60 on: January 01, 2020, 04:52:26 pm »
DJ220:
DC158 is off
DN22 is off


DJ221:
DN22_S is off


DJ221B: Braila :)
StrBac -> StrTudVla as indicated on GM? Or have you field-checked it?


DJ222:
Exceeds limits b/n DN2A_W and +X1
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.244248&lon=28.260030
DJ229P doesn't intersect in HB here


DJ222A:
+X4 is off
DJ229C doesn't intersect in HB here


DJ222B:
DC39 is off
+X6 is off
+X5 is off


DJ222C:
StrPac -> StrPac_S
DJ222_N -> DN22
DJ222 -> DJ222_N


DJ22D:
Exceeds limits b/n +X3 and +X4


DJ222F:
Pec is off
DN22A is off


DJ222K:
DN22D is off


DJ223:
A2 is off


DJ223A:
+X162531 is off
SlaCer is off
+X3 is off
+X2 is (far) off, different routing according to OSM and GM!
DJ222E_W doesn't intersect in HB here
DJ225 doesn't intersect in HB here


DJ223B:
End -> IvrMic


DJ225:
+X6 is off
+X80 is off


DJ226:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.317373&lon=28.617073


DJ226B:
DN2A is off


DJ229:
DJ229C is not in HB

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #61 on: January 02, 2020, 10:05:52 am »
DJ238:
DC69 is off
+X2 is off

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #62 on: January 03, 2020, 05:40:14 am »
DJ241A:
Exceeds limits b/n DN2F_W and +X5
DJ241E is off
+X4 is off
DJ241B_N is off
+X3 is off


DJ241B:
+X4 is off
DJ241D might be positioned better


DJ241F:
DN24 is off
DC91 -> DC94 as indicated on OSM and GM


DJ242:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.898558&lon=27.848633
DN24D is off


DJ243A:
DN11A is off
DN24_N is off
DJ243 doesn't intersect in HB because wp is missing on DJ243 route


DJ243B:
Exceeds limits b/n +X8 and DC81


DJ243E:
Cio -> Cor


DJ244:
DN24A is off


DJ244D:
DN24 is off


DJ244F:
Exceeds limits b/n DC67 and DN28_S
DJ249 is off


DJ244G:
PoduHAg is off
PoduHAg -> PoduHag
DN28 is off


DJ244K:
+X2 is off


DJ246:
+X11 is off
D +128 -> DC128
Suh is off
+X8 is off
DJ248F is off
+X2 is off
Move DN24 between the branches


DJ247:
DN15D is off


DJ247A:
End if off


DJ248:
DC88B -> DC28B according to OSM and GM


DJ248A:
DN15D is off
DJ248B_S is off
DC28_W is DC27 according to OSM


DJ248B:
+X3 is off


DJ248D:
DN28_S is off
DJ248C is off


DJ249:
DC34 is off


DJ249A:
DC16 is off
StrSfIoan -> StrSfaIoan

DJ249C:
Is indicated on the list but missing on HB



54.69% of the routes done!

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #63 on: January 03, 2020, 01:51:29 pm »
DJ251:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ255A and DJ255C
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.445496&lon=28.010277
E584_N is off. I'd move the wp for E584 route to the center of the roundabout (BlvdMil) and move the DJ251 wp to Soseaus Smardan. That's exactly as OSM and GM have it.
DN26 -> DN2B/26


DJ251G:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.866420&lon=27.788959


DJ252:
+X4 is off


DJ252B:
DC88 is off
+X3 is off


DJ252C:
DC98 is off
+X1 is off


DJ253:
DN24_S is off


DJ254A:
All wps are off!


DJ255:
DN26 is off
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.734587&lon=27.891291


DJ255:
Exceeds limits b/n DN2B_E and +X3


DJ255ACis:
DC34A -> DC3A
DJ255C is off, check satellite view
DN25_W is off


DJ255B:
Is 2.27km long but the document indicates a length of 6.592km. I drafted a full circle back to DJ255A via the eastern route (which is indicated being DJ255B on OSM) and that's about 5.7km. Still too short. GM also uses the eastern route and ends more to the north which is also just 4.2km. GM plus western route is 7.0km in total. GSV is not available.
What do you think?

Code: [Select]
41 DJ 255B Lungime: 6,592 Km Reclasat din: DC 33 (DJ 255A - Vila Gârboavele :L=2,100km) + DE (L=4,492km)
Origine: Km 0+000 DJ 255A
Destinaţie: Km 6+592 Pădurea Gâboavele

DJ260s are fine.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm

Offline panda80

  • TM Collaborator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 186
  • Last Login:August 11, 2020, 06:26:27 am
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #65 on: January 04, 2020, 05:21:18 am »


DJ255B:
Is 2.27km long but the document indicates a length of 6.592km. I drafted a full circle back to DJ255A via the eastern route (which is indicated being DJ255B on OSM) and that's about 5.7km. Still too short. GM also uses the eastern route and ends more to the north which is also just 4.2km. GM plus western route is 7.0km in total. GSV is not available.
What do you think?

Code: [Select]
41 DJ 255B Lungime: 6,592 Km Reclasat din: DC 33 (DJ 255A - Vila Gârboavele :L=2,100km) + DE (L=4,492km)
Origine: Km 0+000 DJ 255A
Destinaţie: Km 6+592 Pădurea Gâboavele

Very difficult one, could not find another source. Drafted now according to OSM and GM.

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #66 on: January 04, 2020, 08:08:52 am »
DJ281:
DJ281D_W is off
DJ282D doesn't intersect in HB, file missing in csv file
DJ282D -> DJ282D_N

DJ281A:
End -> DC46


DJ281C:
StrAvrIan_E -> StrAvrIan_W


DJ282:
DC41 -> DC141
Merge DJ292 into DN29_W wp, see satellite view


DJ282A:
DN29D is off
+X1 is off
Exceeds limits b/n DJ282 and DC32


DJ282D:
Route is missing in HB
DJ281 -> DJ281_W


DJ282H:
DN24C is off


DJ284:
DC21 is off
+X1 is off


DJ284A:
End -> ManBuj ?


DJ291:
DN29B is off
DC66 is off
DN29C_N is off
DN29C_S is off


DJ291A:
DC36 is off
DN29 is off


DJ291C:
+X1 is off
DJ291E does not intersect in HB, rename wp since it's not on the list


DJ291D:
DC83A is off
+X5 is off
+X1 is off


DJ292:
Exceeds limits b/n DC88 and +X2


DJ293:
DN24C is off
DJ298_S is off


DJ294:
DN24C is off


DJ294B:
+X1 is off
+X2 is off


DJ296A:
DN29D is off


DJ297:
+X2 is off



http://travelmapping.net/logs/unprocessedwpts.log

Code: [Select]
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj101u.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj104j.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj107usib.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj131mai.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj205i.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj229c.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj229g.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj229p.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj282d.wpt
hwy_data/ROU/roudj/rou.dj593a.wpt

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #67 on: January 04, 2020, 12:42:16 pm »
DJ301:
DJ412_E doesn't intersect here in HB (just at _W wp)
There should be a second route south of the river up to DJ411 according to the list, OSM and GM


DJ304:
DN3A_W is off


DJ306:
DN3A_W is off


DJ307A:
Check route in Vâlcele (or Vâlcelele ?). It might exceed the limits if it's the western route. If it's the eastern route, you might add a wp south of the village where the western route intersects.
DN3_S is off
+X2 is off
+X1 is off


DJ381:
A2 is off


DJ391:
DJ391_N -> DJ391_E
DJ391 -> DJ391_N
DJ391B doesn't intersect in HB and doesn't exist according to the list from the Ministry of Transport


DJ392:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.947854&lon=28.255117


DJ401:
DJ401A is off
DNCB is off
DN4 is off, I'd move it to the roundabout to the west
btw, I'd add wps to the secondary highways (yellow on OSM) for the DN routes in Bucharest


DJ401A:
DJ602_W is off


DJ401C:
DJ412 is off


DJ402:
Exceeds limits b/n Nana and +X6
Exceeds limits b/n DJ403 and StrCarI_S
OSM and GM indicate the route via Tarnadau Mare
+X23 is off


DJ411:
Add wp for missing DJ301
DJ412_S is off


DJ411A:
Split route at DN5A into 2 routes, the (unsigned) concurrency is too long compared to the short eastern segment.
Exceeds limits b/n StrCon and DN6_N


DJ412:
DJ301_N doesn't intersect in HB here


DJ412C:
DJ601 is off, I guess that only the northern branch is DJ412C as indicated on OSM and GM
DN61_S is off



63.86% of the routes done!

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #68 on: January 05, 2020, 01:18:35 pm »
DJ503A:
Exceeds limits b/n DC24 and +X1


DJ504B:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ703 and DJ612_N


DJ505:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ504A_W and DN5C, see GM


DJ506:
Exceeds limits b/n Mag and DN6
DC2 doesn't intersect here but to the west according to OSM and GM
DC131 is off


DJ543:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ642_S and DJ546
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.779894&lon=24.525446


DJ546:
Sae should be replaced by the name of any street around
DX12 is likely off and there is no junction right now. Remove it by a shaping wp or just rename it to +DX12
BlvdAleIoanCuza_E -> BlvdAEC_E or BlvdAleCuza_E or BlvdIoanCuza_E
Move DJ703D to the traffic island or west of it on the DJ546 main route


DJ546A:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ653_N and DJ546B
Exceeds limits b/n DJ653_W and DJ546_S


DJ552:
DJ561A doesn't intersect in HB here (NMP)


DJ553:
DN56_N is off
DN55A_W is off
DN55A_E is off


DJ561A:
DJ606A_W is off


DJ561C:
DJ542 -> DJ542/604


DJ561D:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ561A_N and DC61
DN55A_E is off
DN55A_W is off
DJ561G doesn't intersect in HB here, no wpt file, not on list -> rename wp!


DJ562A:
DJ606 is off


DJ563:
Pun is off


DJ563A:
DJ606B is off


DJ565:
DN56C is off

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #69 on: January 05, 2020, 03:14:49 pm »
DJ571:
DN57_N is off
DJ571C is off
+X4 is off


DJ571B:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.828566&lon=21.805300
DJ571G_E is off
DJ571G_W is off
DC135 is off
+X1 is off


DJ571C:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.902050&lon=21.566216 and new route for branch to DN57/57C
Move DN57_N between the branches
StrRac -> StrRac_E
Soc is off
DJ571K is off
Nai is off


DJ571E:
DN57B is off


DJ571F:
DN57B is off


DJ572:
Check DJ682 routing in Lipova. OSM + GM indicate a different route. Minimum at wp for Strada Mihai Viteazul
DJ592D is off


DJ572B:
DN57B is off


DJ573C:
DN57B_W is off


DJ581A:
+X1 is off


DJ582:
Move DN6 between the branches
DJ582C is off


DJ582C:
+X7 is off
+X6 is off


DJ583:
DN58B is off


DJ583:
+X1 is off
DJ608B is off


DJ585:
DN58B_W is off


DJ586:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ586A and +X3


DJ587:
Exceeds limits b/n Rugi and DN58_N
Apa is off
DN58_E is off


DJ588:
DN57 is off


DJ588A:
DJ173 is off


DJ592:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.755620&lon=21.254304
StrSteMare -> StrSteMare_N


DJ592D:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.687322&lon=21.897506


DJ593:
DJ593A is off
DJ593A doesn't intersect in HB here (unprocessed wpt file)


DJ594B:
DN6 is off


DJ595:
New wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.741334&lon=21.238654


DJ595D:
Does not exist according to the list from the Ministry of Transport
If it exists, it should extend to DJ595 as indicated on OSM and GM


What's about the unprocessed wpt files I reported earlier? Should all be added to csv files or are some wrong and should be deleted? You can add them at the end of the first round of my review (2nd round will be quick) but it would be nice to know. Thanks.



71.18% of the routes checked!

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #70 on: January 05, 2020, 04:05:26 pm »
DJ561D:
DJ561G doesn't intersect in HB here, no wpt file, not on list -> rename wp!

Why have you added DJ561G?
« Last Edit: January 06, 2020, 05:45:06 am by michih »

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #71 on: January 06, 2020, 05:44:43 am »
DNCB:
It has totally wrong coordinates for DJ401 wp!


DN7:
DJ100A does not exist in HB. I guess it's DNCB now? However, it's indicated on OSM where our wp is. I'd rename the wp which is not a point in use, and add the corresponding wp to DN1A route.


DN6 / DN58 / E70:
Check routing at Caransebes but according to OSM and GSV from 2012 and 2018:
- DN6 and E70 are signed via the bypass
- DN58 extends to the rounabout north of the town.
I'm not sure about the official dedication of the DN routes but E70 must definitely be changed in HB as there is no dedication but just raw description of city names!
GM still indicates all routes through the town which is obviously not 100% correct (minimum for E70).


DJ601:
The list only indicates Bucharest as end point. The TM route does currently end where OSM has the end. We might extend it to the south to E81's SosVit wp. The gap is very small, just 200m. This and DJ602 are the only routes which end without intersecting with another TM route in Bucharest.


DJ601D:
StrFlo -> StrFlo_E


DJ601D:
DJ601 -> DJ503


DJ601E:
DJ601 -> DJ401A/DJ601
Ends in Ulmi according to the list and GM.
The segment from DC54 to DJ601A is DJ151E according to the list, GM and OSM. There is currently no DJ151E in HB.


DJ602:
Why does it end at Drumul Saril (length 40.6km according to GM), not at Strada Brasov (38.6km) as indicated on OSM? The list indicates the route from km 0+000 to 40+090 ending in "Bucharest", not more specific.
OSM indicates DJ602 again south of the Dambovita River at E81 wp DJ602 up to the parliament palace :) Either extend DJ602 to E81 or rename E81's wp which is not a point in use.


DJ604:
Extends limits b/n DJ604A and DJ542_N


DJ605A:
DN6B_N is off
DN6B_S is off
Rad is off
DJ676F is off


DJ606:
Add wp @ http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=44.323061&lon=23.777059
Move DN6 to the center of the roundabout


DJ606A:
DC22 is off


DJ606C:
Exceeds limits b/n DJ606B_E and +X2


DJ606D:
DJ606A -> DJ606A/561A


DJ606F:
DC115 is off


DJ607A:
+X3 is off


DJ607C:
DN6 is off


DJ608:
Cru -> DC33 ?


DJ608A:
MunMic is off


DJ607A:
DNVCS must be changed, see DN6 / DN58 / E70


DJ609:
DJ609C doesn't intersect in HB here; DJ609C end is correct when I look at its section length. Rename wp!


DJ609A:
DN6 is off


DJ609B:
DN6 wp must be at the next junction to the east according to OSM, GM and 2018 GSV
A6 -> ToA6 since it's possible to turn at the roundabout


DJ609D:
Are you sure about the routing through Timisoara? Maybe it's concurrent to DN6 instead?

Offline panda80

  • TM Collaborator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 186
  • Last Login:August 11, 2020, 06:26:27 am
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #72 on: January 06, 2020, 11:28:43 am »
DJ561D:
DJ561G doesn't intersect in HB here, no wpt file, not on list -> rename wp!

Why have you added DJ561G?

The route is definetely a DJ, the km posts are blue (looks like they were newly painted, so I can't see the road number), and it's confirmed from OSM and GM. The MT list is quite old, 2014, so some into DJ redesignated DC are not in the list.

Offline panda80

  • TM Collaborator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 186
  • Last Login:August 11, 2020, 06:26:27 am
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #73 on: January 06, 2020, 11:34:58 am »

What's about the unprocessed wpt files I reported earlier? Should all be added to csv files or are some wrong and should be deleted? You can add them at the end of the first round of my review (2nd round will be quick) but it would be nice to know. Thanks.

71.18% of the routes checked!

Sorry for forgetting to say, I plan on adding them at the end, as I would gladly ask you to perform the datacheck on it. Maybe there are some others files that have to be added, so I thought it's better to do it just once. The percentage looks good, almost 3/4 done :)

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2816
  • Last Login:October 19, 2020, 02:16:24 pm
Re: roudj: Romania Drumuri Județene
« Reply #74 on: January 06, 2020, 01:24:54 pm »

What's about the unprocessed wpt files I reported earlier? Should all be added to csv files or are some wrong and should be deleted? You can add them at the end of the first round of my review (2nd round will be quick) but it would be nice to know. Thanks.

71.18% of the routes checked!

Sorry for forgetting to say, I plan on adding them at the end, as I would gladly ask you to perform the datacheck on it. Maybe there are some others files that have to be added, so I thought it's better to do it just once. The percentage looks good, almost 3/4 done :)

I run data check every day after I merged in your pull requests ;) It was just a little bit annoying that I had to look up whether there is a wpt file or not when the wp label started with DJ.... but there was no intersecting route link in HB.
Tuesday is my first day back at work. I don't know how much time I can spend on TM from tomorrow. Maybe more than in 2019, maybe less (definitely less than in the last weeks). We will see :)