wikipedia mentions "Foothills Scenic Route". Why is it missing? Found this: http://webenz.com/foothills-scenic-route/ It's paritally concurrent to Inland Scenic Tourist Route.
Unlike the others it's not signed. And that description isn't partially concurrent with the Inland Scenic Tourist Route / RR72 - it basically is the same thing (just mentioning some places slightly off the highway, and routes that get back quicker). Therefore I won't include it - it's just an alternative name for the ISTR.
The site reports: This route is well signposted and its difficult to get lost, the suggestions are that you have a map and full tank of gas and there are fuel stops at Amberley and Geraldine.
It's
well signposted as the Inland Scenic Tourist Route, or RR72, sure. But not as the Foothills Scenic Route!
If you can submit the pull request on time, I'll check it.
Just going in now
I'll start my trip Tuesday morning but won't do much for TM on Monday. I plan to add two new regions and thousands of TM miles.....
Guessing Ukraine and Moldova? I can't imagine you'd do only two of Kosovo, Serbia and Montenegro given how close they all are. I doubt you'd do Russia, Belarus or Crimea. And the others are all islands.
Though if you are heading NW towards Man/Jersey/Faroes/Iceland, and end up in my neck of the woods, do say!
edit: post 1000! crazy!
I hope you'll add some to the beln thread by late October
I do too. Quebec first though!