I'm not sure what's intentional here, but it makes for a confusing map.
US 212 and MN 62 where they first join (or not) just west of US 169 might be separate on purpose, if the traffic from the two does not really come together on common roadways.
The three points where US 212 ends at US 169, where MN 62 crosses US 169, and the corresponding point on US 169 seem like they can and should be consolidated into one.