Author Topic: usafl: Florida State Highways  (Read 178233 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:03 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #240 on: June 28, 2020, 12:48:21 am »
US221TrkPer has a broken overlap due to the omission of ChuSt.

Fixed.
https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/4008

Even though the route's days are numbered IMO, as it will probably be nuked when FDOT finally signs the reroute of US-221 in the area which they already have AASHTO approval to do so & show in the GIS.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:03 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #241 on: June 30, 2020, 06:00:24 am »
Quote
& I-395 "2" that I mentioned in my previous post?

For I-395, I think changing 2B to just 2 may be fine as long as the graph connections stay.

That should be easy enough till we know what they are planning on doing for the reconfiguration there.  Done in my local files.

fl.fl540: Old9FootRd -> ...probably Old9FRd

I don't think the '9' would count as a word.  Could we go with 'Old9FtRd' maybe?  We honestly should have a rule where we could have a few words that can be abbreviated in labels that aren't 'road types'.  'Foot' would be a natural candidate for something like that.

For I-95 at 12B, should there be a graph connection with US 441, FL 9, and FL 826 here?

One of the most annoying interchange setups for sure in the state.

I might be able to get one for all of the routes @ 12B.  Then add an extra shaping point on I-95 between 12B & 12C to prevent a false multiplex with US-441 & FL-9.

Ok, here's how I changed this area up:
I-95:
Code: [Select]
12A http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=25.921146&lon=-80.210752
+X001A(I95) http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=25.924531&lon=-80.209851
12B http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=25.926873&lon=-80.207282
+X001B(I95) http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=25.928593&lon=-80.205833
12C http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=25.930829&lon=-80.204937
And recentered the following labels in each file to match the '12B' coordinates listed above to enable the graph connections for all (@ 12B) without any other changes to their files:
  • FL-9: FL826
  • FL-826: I-95(12B)
  • US-441: FL826

Sound good to you before I submit those changes?

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 10:44:11 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #242 on: June 30, 2020, 11:14:33 am »
I am fine with the I-95 and I-395 changes.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:03 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #243 on: July 11, 2020, 09:46:24 am »

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:03 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #244 on: July 27, 2020, 11:33:53 pm »
Ok, I think everything is now dealt with in this thread.

Now to deal with the NMP & removing unused alt labels on the US highways.  Then I think we'll be ready for activation!

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Last Login:Today at 02:23:09 am
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #245 on: July 28, 2020, 02:17:37 am »
^ Don't forget my few comments scattered through this thread, including among others on FL 925.

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:03 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #246 on: August 12, 2020, 03:10:05 am »
-- FL 925 appears to be signed only on the northbound one-way frontage road along NB I-95 (NW 3rd Ave.). It has a regular reassurance marker, and an End sign assembly at NW 8th St. (where the HB places FL 925's north end). But there appear to be no route markers on the southbound frontage road on the other side of I-95 (NW 3rd Ct.). The waypoints in the middle of I-95 seem to assume that FL 925 includes both frontage roads, but are you sure it doesn't include only the northbound frontage road?

GIS confirms that it's on both sides of I-95.  I checked StreetView and saw no shields going SB, but I'm not going to align it just on the NB side.  So, no changes here.

-- FL 811 (Oakland Park)'s north endpoint is labeled DixHwy_N. Since that FL 811 segment is Dixie Hwy both north and south of that endpoint, the label doesn't indicate the point on Dixie Hwy where the state route ends. Also, the CHM instruction manual says it is not appropriate to use the continuing road in the label, since the road name doesn't change where the route ends. The endpoint appears to be at the northern city limit of Fort Lauderdale/southern city limit of Pompano Beach, so For/Pom or PomBeaLim would be better endpoint labels.

Changed to For/Pom in my local copy.


======


^ Don't forget my few comments scattered through this thread, including among others on FL 925.

I think I addressed the only post I missed of yours now.  If I haven't, please link any I missed.

Offline oscar

  • TM Collaborator
  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1584
  • Last Login:Today at 02:23:09 am
    • Hot Springs and Highways pages
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #247 on: August 12, 2020, 08:12:15 am »
^ Seems you've addressed all my comments. Thanks!

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:03 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #248 on: August 15, 2020, 10:37:44 am »
Just submitted most of the NMPFPs to the log, and pushed a few minor tweaks.

Will address the unused alt labels in the US routes next.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/4114

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:03 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #249 on: August 16, 2020, 05:13:47 am »
Just pushed the unused alt label removal on all active routes in FL.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/4116

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:03 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #250 on: August 17, 2020, 01:27:41 am »
Just pushed the final NMP FPs to the log.  This should be it.

Last call on anything for usafl before the final prep of getting it activated. :)  Any yes, that does include removing ''Poinciana Parkway" and making it an alt name for the FL-538 file. :)

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/4117

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:03 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #251 on: August 20, 2020, 08:45:28 pm »
Will be looking at making this an active system on Saturday.

Any last issues anybody knows about that need to be addressed before that happens that I might not be aware of?

Offline michih

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4849
  • Last Login:November 20, 2024, 11:21:09 am
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #252 on: August 21, 2020, 02:12:30 am »
Will be looking at making this an active system on Saturday.

One day before the 3rd anniversary :)

Code: [Select]
2017-08-23;(USA) Florida;usafl;Florida State Highways;preview

Offline rickmastfan67

  • TM Collaborator (A)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2064
  • Gender: Male
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:42:03 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #253 on: August 23, 2020, 02:40:38 am »

Offline Jim

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2856
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 09:42:37 pm
Re: usafl: Florida State Highways
« Reply #254 on: August 23, 2020, 08:42:37 am »
Now that's worthy of an extra morning site update - running shortly.