I think SR 102 continues west to the airport.
GIS data shows FL-102 ending at the edge of the bridge overpass of FL-243. Can't find any shields beyond that. Plus for the longest time, the only shield that I was aware of for the route, was
this one. And I personally know that a shield had been there since at least 1996. However, a new
'JCT FL-102' shield was added on the new extension of FL-243.
Plus, that entire area seems to be currently being reconfigured, especially the I-95 NB on/off ramps. Plus it also looks like that they are installing a '
Michigan Left' here. Not too sure how it's going to work with the two service roads on either side of Airport Road. All I know is that the Airport Road/Duval Road intersection there has always been a pain to use.
Anyways, who knows, maybe some more FL-102 shields will be on the way once all the construction in that area is done. Either way, as it currently stands, the route will stay as-is.
Why is SR 109 split in two? The overlap with SR 115 is signed 'to', and I know similar overlaps are included in TM. If I'm not mistaken, there's actually been a reconfiguration so both directions of SR 109 now stay on the frontage road.
Oh boy, this one has always pissed me off. lol. To be honest, I was going to have FL-109A between Cesery Blvd because of all the '
109A' shields that were on it (and then this point would have been mute). However, it seems FDOT finally decided to put the proper '
109' shields up in the last few years.
Anyways, at the 'dogbone' part of the 'western' interchange, they did recently change the signage to add a '
SOUTH FL-109' mention (it was previously a spot they mentioned which way to go for NB FL-109). While that was making me lean to adding it, I followed the 'EB' service road and found this "
JCT FL-109" shield (formerly a 109A). And then @ the intersection, I find a brand spanking new
FL-109A shield with a 'left' (yes, a LEFT) arrow under it. Somebody doesn't want the road to die......
Also, other signage @ University & FL-115 say '
TO FL-109 South' which muddies the water some more. Also, GIS show that 109 does have a gap here. GIS says that the '
FL-109 Arl segment should end South of FL-115 @ the intersection of University/Tanglewood (however signage in field doesn't support this part).
I'm honestly thinking of leaving it as-is, as we don't always consider the 'TO' signage as implied, and can't use an 'implied multiplex' defense here IMO because FL-115 doesn't use the Service Roads at all. Sometimes there will be a gap. Just happens unfortunately.
On a side note, I'll still have to correct the location of the 'UniBlvd_N' point, as that intersection has been move to the North some since the bridge for University there has been replaced and the intersection with Cesery had been reconfigured some.
Does SR 112 actually continue west of FL953_N?
GIS says yes. Signage says yes.
1,
2, & the '
BEGIN shield', complete with a 0.0 MM in the background. So, no changes needed here.
SR 114 is signed (at least on I-95). Waypoints are FraSt (if we're counting interchange-related stubs like that), I-95, and Blvd.
1 sign with shield still present going NB on I-95
as of December '18. All other signs on I-95 say '8th Street' only. No signage at the bottom of each ramp from I-95. No signage along the road itself. Considering route as unsigned (I remember back in the day when it WAS signed, but that was back when it continued all the way to US-1/17). So, no changes here.
Why is SR 267 split in two?
'Curret' GIS agrees that there's no gap (though I thought I saw at one time the GIS data showing a gap with FL-20 only filling it). Signage doesn't agree. There is just a
single 'TO' North FL-267 shield @ the 'southern' intersection, and no FL-267 'TO' signs on FL-20 at all going WB, just FL-20 shields. Same thing happens going the other direction from the 'northern' intersection.
Single 'TO' South FL-267 shield on the route itself before the intersection (
1 on FL-20 before the intersection), and no 'TO' South FL-267 signage going EB on FL-20. Honestly makes this hard to make the 'implied multiplex' defense here without any 'TO' signage along the 'implied multiplex' itself. I still could go either way on this one. Anybody else have any opinions on this?
SR 405 is signed east from US1_S to the end at the JFK Space Center.
GIS says no (shows end @ the start/end of the ramps from US-1 on eastern side of the interchange, which would activate the '1-point per interchange' rule since it's inside of the interchange). Signage on
NB US-1 &
SB US-1 says yes.
END &
BEGIN shields found 0.3 miles from supposed end along CR-405 (per GIS).
Extending it to the 'U-Turn' connection @ the Begin/End shields, as JFKSCen.
SR 414 has new interchanges between FL434 and I-4: GatDr, MaiSumBlvd, and KelRd (Lake Destiny Road will no longer have any direct access when construction is done). HopeRd should be WymRd. There's also a new exit 4B at Marden Road.
GatDr, MaiSumBlvd, and KelRd: Added.
HopeRd: no change. Signed as
Hope Road TO Wymore Road.
Marden Rd: Already in the file ATM on the site, but as
Exit 5. So no change needed here unless you have recent photographic proof that the exit number has been changed since StreetView was last there.
I-4: recentered interchange to new bridges.
SR 419/434: GarAve should be moved west to TusRd.
No, GarAve is needed for shaping reasons. However, still added a point @ TusRd.
SR 423: CurSt -> ChuSt, WyhRd -> WymRd
Fixed.
SR 426: move OakHillDr west to WinSprBlvd?
Main reason I had it at that point was because that road was dead center inside of that curve, and made a logical point to gain the most mileage. However, I've now moved it to the point you suggested.
SR 436: the south end is north of CargoRd at the canal bridges.
GIS agrees. However, no ground signage between those bridges & FL-528.
1 BGS-style sign that looks more like 'advance signage' for a route you're going to JCT with. No Begin/End State Maintenance signs on either road @ the bridges.
Result: shortening it to it's interchange with FL-528.
SR 482: as with other similar routes that end at interchanges with nearby roads (e.g. SR 421), the route extends west of I-4 to TurLakeRd.
GIS doesn't agree, shows end at the intersection with the WB I-4 off-ramp.
"Begin State Maint" sign is also there (END is also there going other way). Since it's within the interchange footprint, no changes here.
SR 524 continues east to SR 528.
GIS agrees. Signage doesn't agree.
END shield at intersection with FL-501.
Signage on FL-528 going WB agrees w/ END shield and has a "TO" above the FL-524 shield.
EB Signage doesn't have a "TO" shield, but there's also no signage at the end of the ramp. There's also a '
JCT shield for FL-524 on what's supposed to be itself.
So, as far as I can tell, FDOT doesn't want to sign it up to FL-528 (due to the END shield I mentioned above), thus, no changes will happen here as that part can be considered 'unsigned'.
SR 526: BurAve -> BumAve
Fixed.
SR 527 (Winter Park): OraAve -> LakeviewSt or GarAve or something that isn't actually SR 527
OraAve -> GarAve
SR 536: signs continue west of I-4 to the WDW property line (marked on OSM)
GIS shows 'western' end at the end of the ramps from I-4. No standalone signage between the I-4 ramps & the WDW signage welcoming you.
Signage on WB I-4 shows no FL-536 'West' shield, only 'East'. Since the western 'end' is within the interchange footprint per GIS, and no other signage proving otherwise (
this BGS doesn't count since it still is technically the road and inside of the interchange), no changes here.
SR 551: GolRdExt -> OldGolRd
Fixed.
SR 586, SR 590, SR 686, SR 688: add CR501?
Sure, why not. Added to all 4 routes.
SR 594 extends west to the eastbound end of I-175.
No changes here, as we have I-175 ending 4th Street (the location of it's 'start' going WB). I know, it's complicated because of FL-594 only being signed EB due to Dali Blvd being one-way between 4th & 3rd Street. It was the best solution that could be arranged and keep 'graph connections' with FL-687 too. Otherwise, we couldn't have FL-594 on the site. Honestly wish this was one route FDOT didn't want to sign.
US 17/92: add CR580 in Haines City, CR54 -> RonReaPkwy, CR535 -> HamBroRd, CR531 -> PleHillRd (neither CR 535 nor CR 531 is signed or recognized by the county), US17/92Trk_S -> FL423, FL414/17Trk -> FL414 (these are much better signed than the truck routes), DirDr -> CR4162, SaxBlvd -> CR4146
CR580: Added.
RonReaPkwy: Changed & recentered.
HamBroRd/PleHillRd: Done.
FL423/FL414: Done & see below in "US 17/92 Truck (Orlando)" section.
CR4162/CR4146: Done.
US 17/92/441: CR527A -> LanRd
Done.
US 17: move KatSt one block north to CR4053
Done.
US 27: add CR17_HaiCity, RonReaPwky -> RonReaPkwy, add CROld50 in Minneola
CR17_HaiCity: Added as 'CR17_Hai'.
RonReaPkwy: Fixed, old label depreciated as in-use.
CROld50: Added.
US 192: AvaRd -> CR545_N, CR545 -> CR545_S, KisParkRd -> OCanCRd (to match US 441)
All fixed.
US 192/441: CR523_N -> CR523
No change here, as there's a corresponding 'CR523_S' in US-441's file that's the southern part of this same road.
US 441: add CR437_N and CR437_S just south of SR 429, CR452 -> LakeEusDr, CR44_E -> CR44LegA, CR44_W -> CR44
All changed except 'CR44_W' do to conflict with FL-44 file, which has a 'CR44' point (but might come back to this at a later time).
"CR44_E -> CR44LegA" also fixed in FL-44's file. However, a separate post about FL-44 will be coming at a later time.
US 17/92 Truck (Orlando): WyhRd -> WymRd_S, HopeRd -> WymRd_N
Shields seem to have been removed at the Northern end.
Apr '15 ->
July '15. Similar story at the 'Southern' end,
May '15 ->
July '15. Signage even @ I-4 & FL-423 is now gone (
Apr '11 ->
Dec '18).
Considering both routes now as 'dead' even though 'problem bridge' remains, and will remove them both from site on next update.
