Author Topic: MD: I-70 Minor Issues  (Read 3807 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3302
  • Last Login:Today at 04:12:48 pm
MD: I-70 Minor Issues
« on: December 17, 2019, 07:58:37 pm »
1.  I want to note that the MD 615 line does end up south of I-70/US 40.
2.  I want to note that the MD 17 line ends up north of I-70 briefly southeast of the interchange. (where MD 17 should remain south of I-70)
3.  The concurrency with US 40 is broken as US 40 has *I-70(54) while I-70 does not.  (Looking further, it seems to be the result of removing this point on I-70 so it should be removed from US 40.)

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: MD: I-70 Minor Issues
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2019, 12:44:54 pm »
MD US40 I-70(54) is in use. I had overlooked the other thread & need to catch up, but I would support instead adding the closed point back to I-70 with whatever waypoint label is appropriate.
It should be noted that on I-70 itself, 54A is in use, but still not plain 54.
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Duke87

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1018
  • Last Login:Yesterday at 11:12:21 pm
Re: MD: I-70 Minor Issues
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2019, 08:55:42 pm »
1.  I want to note that the MD 615 line does end up south of I-70/US 40.

Nothing a little shaping point won't fix!

Also, hey, the south end of MD 615 really should have a graph connection with I-70 shouldn't it? Now it shall.

Quote
2.  I want to note that the MD 17 line ends up north of I-70 briefly southeast of the interchange. (where MD 17 should remain south of I-70)

Fixed by adding a couple shaping points to I-70.

Quote
3.  The concurrency with US 40 is broken as US 40 has *I-70(54) while I-70 does not.  (Looking further, it seems to be the result of removing this point on I-70 so it should be removed from US 40.)

Well that's a whoopsie.

I agree with yakra that since *I-70(54) is in use that removing it (or making it the label for the new exit 54 location) would not be ideal. That said I like that on I-70 it was possible to put 54 in the currently correct location since it wasn't in use and am not inclined to undo that.

So, point added back to I-70, named "*Old54".