It seems more likely that this would happen for someone from Maryland or Connecticut.
🙋
I live in Connecticut and while I have clinched all mileage within it, there are no fewer than 8 regions in which I have more miles.
That said, I didn't have any of this prior to my last move, as New York (where I lived for a while) was and still is my #1 region in terms of raw miles clinched. The most mileage I have anywhere that I've never lived is in Pennsylvania, which is #2 overall currently... however Texas is only about 100 miles behind for active+preview... and if the FMs were live it would be #2. (It was #2 without the FMs prior to this past weekend, but I went and clinched a bunch of roads in PA, so...)
Since some people live in states with small amounts of primary mileage, a better question might be this, which surprises me whenever I think about my own answer:
What is an absurdly small amount of mileage you have in an adjoining state to you?
I mean... only three states adjoin Connecticut. Two of them I have 100% clinched, and the third is the aforementioned New York which I am at 72.92% of. I don't even have a great answer if I broaden "adjoining" to "nearby" as there is no northeastern state I am under 30% in.
But how about we flip this question around: what is an absurdly large amount of mileage you have in a region nowhere near you?
For this I submit the fact that in spite of having always lived in the north
eastern US, the two Canadian provinces in which I have the highest percentage of their systems clinched are... Yukon (45.32%) and British Columbia (29.23%). Making it even more fun is that every single inch of road I have clinched in those provinces is all from
one trip. I have been to much closer Ontario and Quebec numerous times, but am at a far lower percentage in both (9.87% and 10.36%, respectively).
That said, Quebec is ahead of Yukon for me (but not British Columbia!) in terms of raw mileage.