Author Topic: TX: Point Concerns  (Read 3746 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Today at 11:27:34 am
TX: Point Concerns
« on: August 18, 2021, 05:04:37 pm »
I think a point should be added for Walsh Ranch Pkwy (Exit 1A).  I think that is beyond 1PPI for the I-20/I-30 Interchange.

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: TX: I-30 Exit 1A
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2021, 06:44:54 pm »
A fairly new exit, c. 2014 per HistoricAerials.
One snag is that 1A is an in-use AltLabel for I-20. 22 users, 16 full clinches.
I'll finish off some Prince Edward Island updates, then think about what to do with this...
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Today at 11:27:34 am
TX: Point Concerns
« Reply #2 on: October 26, 2021, 10:27:50 am »
I-30:
1.  I think we need a point at AT&T Way (Exit 28).  This should maybe be 28C.
2.  It seems to me that 43A is part of Exit 44.
3.  I recommend removing *44B as it seems to not currently be in-use and 1PPI.

US 377: 
1.  I-30(13) should be I-30(12B).
2.  I-30(14) should be I-30(13B).

I am unsure if this should be merged with the I-30 (Exit 1A) thread that I previously posted or not.

EDIT: Since these were merged, I fixed the first post to reference I-30.
« Last Edit: October 26, 2021, 02:52:27 pm by Markkos1992 »

Offline Markkos1992

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3301
  • Last Login:Today at 11:27:34 am
Re: TX: Point Concerns
« Reply #3 on: October 26, 2021, 01:39:40 pm »
I-20: 
2.  It looks like 42 (US 285) and 386 (US 281) could use some slight recentering.
2.  It looks like 194B should be 195A.

I-20 BUS (Roscoe):  1stSt_W should be CR182 based on Nolan County's CAD Web App.  You could also go BroSt_W debatably...

Offline yakra

  • TM Collaborator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4422
  • Last Login:November 11, 2024, 12:50:03 pm
  • I like C++
Re: TX: Point Concerns
« Reply #4 on: October 26, 2021, 08:06:27 pm »
I think a point should be added for Walsh Ranch Pkwy (Exit 1A).  I think that is beyond 1PPI for the I-20/I-30 Interchange.
A fairly new exit, c. 2014 per HistoricAerials.
One snag is that 1A is an in-use AltLabel for I-20. 22 users, 16 full clinches.
I'll finish off some Prince Edward Island updates, then think about what to do with this...
Fudged to a suffixless Exit 1. A bit of a reversal of the more common "Exit 0A" fudgesicle, or the recent wacky antics at MS I-269.

I-30:
1.  I think we need a point at AT&T Way (Exit 28).  This should maybe be 28C.
Vanilla 28 added.

2.  It seems to me that 43A is part of Exit 44.
44's not in use, so 43A & 44 are changed to 44 & 44A respectively on Two separate interchanges numbered 44 grounds -- a 3/4 diamond at Sylvan, and a 1/2 diamond at Beckley. LOL Texas being Texas.

3.  I recommend removing *44B as it seems to not currently be in-use and 1PPI.
The old 44B ramp gores were east of the ramp gores of present-day 45A. Meh, sure.

US 377: 
1.  I-30(13) should be I-30(12B).
2.  I-30(14) should be I-30(13B).
Changed.

I-20: 
2.  It looks like 42 (US 285) and 386 (US 281) could use some slight recentering.
Recentered, although normally I don't bother with minor recenterings unless I already have a route open in the HB for other reasons.

2.  It looks like 194B should be 195A.
Hm. Weird one. No exit sign, but there's this. Gotta wonder if it was a more "official" exit in the past, possibly numbered 194B, as that would explain the odd numbering of 194A with no vanilla 194.
That offramp's right up on the the WB onramp from 195, so this point's eliminated, with 195 moved west to compensate.

I-20 BUS (Roscoe):  1stSt_W should be CR182 based on Nolan County's CAD Web App.  You could also go BroSt_W debatably...
CR182 per txdot-roadways_tx shapefiles. I don't worry abou esoteric county-level sources in TX. Relabeled.

https://github.com/TravelMapping/HighwayData/pull/5254
Sri Syadasti Syadavaktavya Syadasti Syannasti Syadasti Cavaktavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavatavyasca Syadasti Syannasti Syadavaktavyasca